do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-230/18: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol — Austria) — PI v Landespolizeidirektion Tirol (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 49 TFEU — Article 15(2) and Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services — Restriction — Decision to immediately close a commercial enterprise — No statement of reasons — Overriding reasons in the public interest — Prevention of criminal offences against persons engaged in prostitution — Protection of public health — Proportionality of the restriction on the freedom of establishment — Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Effectiveness of judicial review — Rights of defence — General principle of the right to good administration)
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cessation of trading, freedom to provide services, judicial review, prostitution, public health, right of establishment, rights of the defence








C_2019230EN.01001501.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/15






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol — Austria) — PI v Landespolizeidirektion Tirol
(Case C-230/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 49 TFEU - Article 15(2) and Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services - Restriction - Decision to immediately close a commercial enterprise - No statement of reasons - Overriding reasons in the public interest - Prevention of criminal offences against persons engaged in prostitution - Protection of public health - Proportionality of the restriction on the freedom of establishment - Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Effectiveness of judicial review - Rights of defence - General principle of the right to good administration)
(2019/C 230/17)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol

Parties to the main proceedings


Complainant: PI

Defendant authority: Landespolizeidirektion Tirol

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU, Article 15(2) and Articles 16, 47 and 52 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and the general principle of the right to good administration must be interpreted, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, as precluding national legislation providing that an administrative authority may decide to close a commercial establishment with immediate effect, on the ground that it suspects that prostitution is practised in that establishment without the authorisation required under that legislation, in so far as that legislation, first, does not require reasons, in fact and in law, to be given in writing for such a decision and to be communicated to its addressee, and second, requires that any application brought by that addressee and seeking annulment of that decision must be reasoned.


(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.
Case T-358/18: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — J. García Carrión v EUIPO — Codorníu (JAUME CODORNÍU) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark JAUME CODORNÍU — Earlier Spanish and EU word marks JAUME SERRA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Distinctive character of a first name and a surname)
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019238EN.01001701.xml










15.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 238/17






Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — J. García Carrión v EUIPO — Codorníu (JAUME CODORNÍU)
(Case T-358/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark JAUME CODORNÍU - Earlier Spanish and EU word marks JAUME SERRA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Distinctive character of a first name and a surname)
(2019/C 238/21)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: J. García Carrión, SA (Jumilla, Spain) (represented by: E. Arsuaga Santos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Codorníu, SA (Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: M. Ceballos Rodríguez and M. Hernández Gásquez, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 April 2018 (Case R 451/2017-4) relating to opposition proceedings between J. García Carrión and Codorníu.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders J. García Carrión SA to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.
Case T-434/15: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Non-contractual liability — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, damages, economic sanctions, international sanctions, nuclear non-proliferation








C_2019220EN.01003001.xml










1.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 220/30






Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and Others v Council
(Case T-434/15) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Non-contractual liability - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals)
(2019/C 220/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (Tehran, Iran) and the six other applicants whose names are set out in the Annex to the judgment (represented by: M. Taher, Solicitor, M. Malek QC, and R. Blakeley, Barrister)

Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and H. Marcos Fraile, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, pursuant to Articles 268 and 340 TFEU, for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the inclusion of their names on the lists set out in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39), in the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25), in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 81), in Annex VIII to Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1) and in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 of 23 March 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation No 961/2010 (OJ 2012 L 88, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and the other applicants whose names are set out in the Annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.







(1)  OJ C 328, 5.10.2015.
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 118/2019 of 8 May 2019 amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2016]
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, biocide, chemical product, market approval, preservative, revision of an agreement




L_2022279EN.01001601.xml










27.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 279/16








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 118/2019
of 8 May 2019
         
amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2016]


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1985 of 13 December 2018 not approving Willaertia magna c2c maky as an active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 11 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following point is inserted after point 12zzzzzu (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1305) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:






‘12zzzzzv.



32018 D 1985: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1985 of 13 December 2018 not approving Willaertia magna c2c maky as an active substance for use in biocidal products of product-type 11 (OJ L 317, 14.12.2018, p. 27).’






Article 2
The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1985 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on 1 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).


Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 8 May 2019.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Claude MAERTEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 317, 14.12.2018, p. 27.

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.
Case C-9/19: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București — Romania) — SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală and Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the question referred — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, administrative sanction, admissibility, criminal liability, debt, penalty, tax collection, tax evasion, tax inspection, taxpayer








C_2019288EN.01000902.xml










26.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/9






Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București — Romania) — SC Mitliv Exim SRL v Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală and Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili
(Case C-9/19) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Insufficient information regarding the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings and lack of grounds justifying the need for an answer to the question referred - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2019/C 288/11)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul București

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SC Mitliv Exim SRL

Defendants: Agenția Națională de Administrare Fiscală and Direcția Generală de Administrare a Marilor Contribuabili

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Regional Court, Bucharest, Romania), made by decision of 8 June 2018, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 131, 8.4.2019.
Case C-365/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2019 — FD v Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria, single payment scheme, young farmer








C_2019288EN.01002001.xml










26.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/20






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2019 — FD v Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg
(Case C-365/19)
(2019/C 288/26)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Schwerin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: FD

Defendant: Staatliches Amt für Landwirtschaft und Umwelt Mittleres Mecklenburg

Question referred

Does Article 30(6) of Regulation (EU) 1307/2013 (1) — possibly in conjunction with Article 28(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 639/2014 (2) — establish a legal right to allocation of payment entitlements for the 2016 claim year for a young farmer even when, on the basis of Article 24 of Regulation (EU) 1307/2013, he has already been allocated payment entitlements free of charge from the 2015 national ceiling corresponding to his area of land at that time?


(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 608).

(2)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and amending Annex X to that Regulation (OJ 2014 L 181, p. 1).
Case C-253/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Article 5(1) and (2) — Direct award — Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram — Conditions — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 12 — Directive 2014/25/EU — Article 28)
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, bus, public transport, service concession, services contract, vehicle on rails








C_2019230EN.01001601.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/16






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Stadt Euskirchen v Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG
(Case C-253/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Transport - Public passenger transport services by rail and by road - Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 - Article 5(1) and (2) - Direct award - Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and by tram - Conditions - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 12 - Directive 2014/25/EU - Article 28)
(2019/C 230/19)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Stadt Euskirchen

Defendant: Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG

Joined parties: SVE Stadtverkehr Euskirchen GmbH, RVK Regionalverkehr Köln GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 must be interpreted as meaning that it is not applicable to the direct award of contracts relating to public passenger transport services by bus which do not take the form of service concessions contracts within the meaning of Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts.


(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019157EN.01001101.xml










8.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 157/11






Euro exchange rates (1)

7 May 2019
(2019/C 157/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1185 




JPY


Japanese yen


123,73 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4657 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,85645 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,7145 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1415 




ISK


Iceland króna


136,60 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,7605 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,731 




HUF


Hungarian forint


324,30 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2862 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7580 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,8751 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5944 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5065 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7781 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6957 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5242 




KRW


South Korean won


1 309,83 




ZAR


South African rand


16,1219 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5710 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4100 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 972,18 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6401 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,108 




RUB


Russian rouble


72,7907 




THB


Thai baht


35,680 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,4383 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,2691 




INR


Indian rupee


77,6400 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-494/17: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Trento — Italy) — Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR v Fabio Rossato, Conservatorio di Musica F.A. Bonporti (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Fixed-term work — Contracts concluded with a public sector employer — Measures to penalise misuse of fixed-term employment contracts — Conversion of the employment relationship into a relationship of indefinite duration — Limitation on the retroactive effect of the conversion — No financial remedies)
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: damages, framework agreement, full-time employment, public sector, teacher, temporary employment, work contract








C_2019230EN.01000502.xml










8.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 230/5






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Trento — Italy) — Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR v Fabio Rossato, Conservatorio di Musica F.A. Bonporti
(Case C-494/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Fixed-term work - Contracts concluded with a public sector employer - Measures to penalise misuse of fixed-term employment contracts - Conversion of the employment relationship into a relationship of indefinite duration - Limitation on the retroactive effect of the conversion - No financial remedies)
(2019/C 230/06)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte d’appello di Trento

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca — MIUR

Defendants: Fabio Rossato, Conservatorio di Musica F.A. Bonporti

Operative part of the judgment

Clause 5(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work, concluded on 18 March 1999, which is annexed to Council Directive 1999/70/EC of 28 June 1999 concerning the framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP, is to be interpreted as not precluding legislation which, as applied by the national supreme courts, precludes any entitlement to financial compensation on account of the misuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts for public-sector teachers whose employment relationship has been converted from a fixed-term relationship into one of indefinite duration, with limited retroactive effect, if such conversion is neither uncertain nor unpredictable or fortuitous and the limited account taken of the period of service completed under those successive fixed-term employment contracts constitutes a measure that is proportionate for the purpose of punishing that misuse, which is a matter for the national court to determine.


(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.
Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 132/2019 of 8 May 2019 amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2029]
Date: 2019-05-08
Institutions: EEA Joint Committee
Subjects: European Economic Area, approval, environmental standard, greenhouse gas, light-duty vehicle, motor vehicle pollution, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions, revision of an agreement, technical specification, technical standard




L_2022279EN.01003801.xml










27.10.2022   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 279/38








            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 132/2019
of 8 May 2019
         
amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2022/2029]


THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2042 of 18 December 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1152 to clarify the WLTP test conditions and provide for the monitoring of type approval data (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(2)


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2043 of 18 December 2018 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153 to clarify the WLTP test conditions and provide for the monitoring of type approval data (2) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.












(3)


Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Annex XX to the EEA Agreement shall be amended as follows:






1.


The following is added in point 21aey (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1152):

                              ‘, as amended by:






—



32018 R 2042: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2042 of 18 December 2018 (OJ L 327, 21.12.2018, p. 53).’
                                 














2.


The following indent is added in point 21aez (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1153):






‘—



32018 R 2043: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2043 of 18 December 2018 (OJ L 327, 21.12.2018, p. 58).’










Article 2
The texts of Implementing Regulations (EU) 2018/2042 and (EU) 2018/2043 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on 1 June 2019, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*).


Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 8 May 2019.


For the EEA Joint Committee


The President

Claude MAERTEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 327, 21.12.2018, p. 53.

(2)  
            OJ L 327, 21.12.2018, p. 58.

(*)  No constitutional requirements indicated.