do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Single Resolution Board — Publication of two vacancies for the function of Member of the Board and Director of Resolution Planning and Decisions (COM/2019/20035) (OJ C 115 A, 27.3.2019)
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: Single Resolution Board
Subjects: EU office or agency, competition (EU), economic recession, job vacancy, president of an institution, recruitment








CA2019147EN.01000201.xml










29.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 147/2






Corrigendum to Single Resolution Board — Publication of two vacancies for the function of Member of the Board and Director of Resolution Planning and Decisions (COM/2019/20035)
(

Official Journal of the European Union C 115 A of 27 March 2019

)
(2019/C 147 A/02)
On page 10, ‘Closing date’:

for:

‘The deadline for applications is 29 April 2019. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time’,


read:

‘The deadline for applications is 17 May 2019. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time’.
Case C-350/19 P: Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Souruh SA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-440/16 Souruh v Council
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, rights of the defence, trade restriction








C_2019213EN.01002301.xml










24.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/23






Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Souruh SA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-440/16 Souruh v Council
(Case C-350/19 P)
(2019/C 213/22)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Souruh SA (represented by: E. Ruchat, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant submits that the Court should:






—


Declare the appeal admissible and well founded;










—


Accordingly, set aside the judgment of 28 February 2019 (T-440/16);




And, giving judgment itself,






—


Annul Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 (1) and its subsequent implementing acts, in so far as they concern the appellant;










—


Order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The first ground of appeal alleges an error of law in that the General Court disregarded the applicant’s right, enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to be heard prior to the adoption of new restrictive measures.
The second ground of appeal alleges an error of law and distortion of the facts in that the General Court disregarded the items submitted by the applicant in support of its action for annulment to demonstrate that it did not support the Syrian regime.
The third ground of appeal alleges an error of law in so far as the General Court did not hold that Articles 27 and 28 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP, according to which membership of the Al-Assad or Makhlouf families constitutes an autonomous criterion justifying the imposition of sanctions, were illegal and in so far as it, on the same occasion, reversed the burden of proof.


(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) of 27 May 2016 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 125).
Case C-349/19 P: Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Almashreq Investment Fund against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-415/16 Almashreq Investment Find v Council
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, rights of the defence, trade restriction








C_2019213EN.01002201.xml










24.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/22






Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Almashreq Investment Fund against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-415/16 Almashreq Investment Find v Council
(Case C-349/19 P)
(2019/C 213/21)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Almashreq Investment Fund (represented by: E. Ruchat, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant submits that the Court should:






—


Declare the appeal admissible and well founded;










—


Accordingly, set aside the judgment of 28 February 2019 (T-415/16);




And, giving judgment itself,






—


Annul Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 (1) and its subsequent implementing acts, in so far as they concern the appellant;










—


Order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The first ground of appeal alleges an error of law in that the General Court disregarded the applicant’s right, enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to be heard prior to the adoption of new restrictive measures.
The second ground of appeal alleges an error of law and distortion of the facts in that the General Court disregarded the items submitted by the applicant in support of its action for annulment to demonstrate that it did not support the Syrian regime.
The third ground of appeal alleges an error of law in so far as the General Court did not hold that Articles 27 and 28 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP, according to which membership of the Al-Assad or Makhlouf families constitutes an autonomous criterion justifying the imposition of sanctions, were illegal and in so far as it, on the same occasion, reversed the burden of proof.


(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) of 27 May 2016 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 125).
Corrigendum to Single Resolution Board — Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Vice-Chair and Director operating the SRB corporate services and overseeing the Single Resolution Fund (COM/2019/20034) (OJ C 115 A, 27.3.2019)
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: Single Resolution Board
Subjects: EU office or agency, competition (EU), economic recession, job vacancy, president of an institution, recruitment, vice-president of an institution








CA2019147EN.01000101.xml










29.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 147/1






Corrigendum to Single Resolution Board — Publication of a vacancy for the function of the Vice-Chair and Director operating the SRB corporate services and overseeing the Single Resolution Fund (COM/2019/20034)
(

Official Journal of the European Union C 115 A of 27 March 2019

)
(2019/C 147 A/01)
On page 5, ‘Closing date’:

for:

‘The deadline for applications is 29 April 2019. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time’,


read:

‘The deadline for applications is 17 May 2019. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time’.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9329 — TDR Capital/NKD Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: clothing, durable goods, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, petrol, retail selling, textile product








C_2019147EN.01000801.xml










29.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 147/8






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9329 — TDR Capital/NKD Group)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 147/06)

1.   
On 16 April 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


TDR Capital LLP (TDR Capital, United Kingdom),










—


NKD Holdings GmbH (Germany), NKD Österreich Holding GmbH (Austria), and Sun Fortune Ltd. (Honk Kong) (together — NKD Group, Germany)




TDR Capital acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of NKD Group.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for TDR Capital: a private equity firm, which has investments in companies in a variety of sectors, including petrol stations and retail and convenience operations connected with those petrol stations,
—   for NKD Group: a discount value retailer selling apparel, home textiles, and hard goods (such as toys, various electronics devices and lighting products) in Germany, Austria, Italy, Slovenia, and Croatia.


3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9329 — TDR Capital/NKD Group
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9340 — Alliance Automotive Group/Parts Point Group) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, vehicle parts, wholesale trade








C_2019157EN.01001001.xml










8.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 157/10






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9340 — Alliance Automotive Group/Parts Point Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 157/02)
On 29 April 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9340. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-348/19 P: Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Drex Technologies SA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-414/16 Drex Technologies v Council
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, rights of the defence, trade restriction








C_2019213EN.01002101.xml










24.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/21






Appeal brought on 29 April 2019 by Drex Technologies SA against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 28 February 2019 in Case T-414/16 Drex Technologies v Council
(Case C-348/19 P)
(2019/C 213/20)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Drex Technologies SA (represented by: E. Ruchat, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant submits that the Court should:






—


Declare the appeal admissible and well founded;










—


Accordingly, set aside the judgment of 28 February 2019 (T-414/16);




And, giving judgment itself,






—


Annul Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 (1) and its subsequent implementing acts, in so far as they concern the appellant;










—


Order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Grounds of appeal and main arguments

The first ground of appeal alleges an error of law in that the General Court disregarded the applicant’s right, enshrined in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, to be heard prior to the adoption of new restrictive measures.
The second ground of appeal alleges an error of law and distortion of the facts in that the General Court disregarded the items submitted by the applicant in support of its action for annulment to demonstrate that it did not support the Syrian regime.
The third ground of appeal alleges an error of law in so far as the General Court did not hold that Articles 27 and 28 of Decision 2013/255/CFSP, according to which membership of the Al-Assad or Makhlouf families constitutes an autonomous criterion justifying the imposition of sanctions, were illegal and in so far as it, on the same occasion, reversed the burden of proof.


(1)  Council Decision (CFSP) of 27 May 2016 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 125).
Case T-495/18: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2019 — Dermatest v EUIPO (DERMATEST) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark DERMATEST — Refusal of registration — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, hairdressing and beauty care, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2019213EN.01003701.xml










24.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/37






Order of the General Court of 29 April 2019 — Dermatest v EUIPO (DERMATEST)
(Case T-495/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark DERMATEST - Refusal of registration - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 213/38)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH (Münster, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek, D. Hanf and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2018 (Case R 426/2018-4), relating to an application for registration of the word sign DERMATEST as an EU trade mark

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.











2.



Dermatest Gesellschaft für allergologische Forschung u. Vertrieb von Körperpflegemitteln mbH shall pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 352, 1.10.2018.
Case C-633/17: Order of the President of the Court of 29 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Gmalieva s.r.o., Manfred Naderhirn, in the presence of: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich, Bezirkshauptmann von Linz-Land
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, appeal, freedom to provide services, legal system, principle of proportionality, right of establishment, right to justice








C_2019288EN.01003702.xml










26.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/37






Order of the President of the Court of 29 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich — Austria) — Gmalieva s.r.o., Manfred Naderhirn, in the presence of: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich, Bezirkshauptmann von Linz-Land
(Case C-633/17) (1)

(2019/C 288/45)
Language of the case: German
The President has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.
Case T-381/18: Order of the General Court of 29 April 2019 — Engel v EUIPO — F. Engel (ENGEL) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019213EN.01003601.xml










24.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/36






Order of the General Court of 29 April 2019 — Engel v EUIPO — F. Engel (ENGEL)
(Case T-381/18) (1)

(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 213/37)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Engel GmbH (Pfullingen, Germany) (represented by: C. Pfitzer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: F. Engel K/S (Haderslev, Denmark) (represented by: L. Elmgaard Sørensen, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2018 (Case R 1423/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between F. Engel and Engel.

Operative part of the order







1.



There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.











2.



Engel GmbH and F. Engel K/S shall bear their own costs and Engel GmbH shall pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).







(1)  OJ C 276, 6.8.2018.
Case C-340/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 29 April 2019 — Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v SIA ‘Hydro Energo’
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, bar, common customs tariff, copper, specification of tariff heading








C_2019220EN.01002501.xml










1.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 220/25






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa (Senāts) (Latvia) lodged on 29 April 2019 — Valsts ieņēmumu dienests v SIA ‘Hydro Energo’
(Case C-340/19)
(2019/C 220/31)
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa (Senāts)

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: SIA ‘Hydro Energo’

Question referred

Must the Combined Nomenclature, as set out in Annex I of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (1) amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 of 27 September 2011, (2) be interpreted as meaning that heading 7407 (Copper bars, rods and profiles) includes copper or copper alloy ingots in a rectangular shape, the thickness of which exceeds one-tenth of the width and which are hot-rolled, but which have irregular pores, holes and cracks in their cross-section?


(1)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2011 L 282, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (OJ C 39, 1.2.2019)
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Corsica, France, Ile-de-France, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2019147EN.01001001.xml










29.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 147/10






Corrigendum to Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 39 of 1 February 2019
)
(2019/C 147/07)
On page 17, fourth row of the table:

for:








‘Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders


8 April 2019 (16:00, local time)’,






read:








‘New deadline for the submission of applications and tenders


6 May 2019 (12:00, local time)’.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-04-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019147EN.01000501.xml










29.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 147/5






Euro exchange rates (1)

26 April 2019
(2019/C 147/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1133 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,45 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4654 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86340 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5738 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1372 




ISK


Iceland króna


136,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,6653 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,705 




HUF


Hungarian forint


322,11 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2878 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7597 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,6242 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5824 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5020 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,7337 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6739 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5175 




KRW


South Korean won


1 292,46 




ZAR


South African rand


16,0481 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,4991 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4165 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 804,41 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6079 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,074 




RUB


Russian rouble


72,1131 




THB


Thai baht


35,614 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,4134 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,2210 




INR


Indian rupee


77,9495 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.