do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Czechia, South Moravian Region, air transport, intra-EU transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2019143EN.01000201.xml










24.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 143/2






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 143/02)






Member State


Czech Republic




Concerned routes


Brno (Czech Republic) — Munich (Germany)




Period of validity of the contract


approximately
27 October 2019 - 24 March 2022




Deadline for submission of tenders


24 June 2019




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained


For further information please contact:





Jihomoravský kraj — Krajský úřad




Žerotínovo nám. 449/3




601 82 Brno




CZECH REPUBLIC




Tel. +420 541651338




Email: megova.dana@kr-jihomoravsky.cz




www.kr-jihomoravsky.cz
Case C-335/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 24 April 2019 — E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k., having its seat in S. v Minister Finansów
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, claim, debt, goods and services, liquidation, supply, tax law, tax relief, tax return, taxpayer








C_2019280EN.01002001.xml










19.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 280/20






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 24 April 2019 — E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k., having its seat in S. v Minister Finansów
(Case C-335/19)
(2019/C 280/27)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: E. Sp. z o.o. Sp. k., having its seat in S.

Defendant: Minister Finansów

Questions referred







1.


Do the provisions of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) — and in particular Article 90(2) thereof — having regard to the principles of fiscal neutrality and proportionality, permit the introduction into national law of a restriction on the ability to reduce the taxable amount in the event of partial or total non-payment by reason of the specific tax status of the debtor and the creditor?










2.


In particular, does EU law not preclude the introduction of a rule in national legislation which provides for the option of taking advantage of ‘bad debt relief’ only on condition that on the date on which the service or goods are supplied and on the day preceding the date on which the tax return adjustment is filed in order to benefit from this relief:






—


the debtor is not subject to insolvency or liquidation proceedings?










—


the creditor and debtor are both registered as active VAT taxpayers?










(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.
Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France, Poitou-Charentes, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2019143EN.01000301.xml










24.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 143/3






Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 143/04)






Member State


France




Route concerned


La Rochelle – Poitiers-Lyon




Period of validity of the contract


1 November 2019 – 31 October 2023




Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders


1 July 2019 (17.00, Paris time)




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained







Syndicat Mixte des Aéroports de la Rochelle - Ile de Ré et Rochefort – Charente-Maritime




Rue du Jura




17000 La Rochelle




FRANCE




Tel. +33 546428671




Fax +33 546000484




Email: aeroport@larochelle.aeroport.fr




Buyer profile (website):




http://www.e-marchespublics.com/
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9347 — OEP/WP Group) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, health care, mechanical engineering, merger control, technology, vehicle parts








C_2019151EN.01000102.xml










3.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 151/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9347 — OEP/WP Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 151/02)
On 24 April 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9347. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/50 of 11 January 2019 amending Annexes II, III, IV and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for chlorantraniliprole, clomazone, cyclaniliprole, fenazaquin, fenpicoxamid, fluoxastrobin, lambda-cyhalothrin, mepiquat, onion oil, thiacloprid and valifenalate in or on certain products (OJ L 10, 14.1.2019)
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: consumer protection, crop production, food inspection, food safety, foodstuff, pesticide, pesticide residue








L_2019109EN.01002802.xml










24.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 109/28







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/50 of 11 January 2019 amending Annexes II, III, IV and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for chlorantraniliprole, clomazone, cyclaniliprole, fenazaquin, fenpicoxamid, fluoxastrobin, lambda-cyhalothrin, mepiquat, onion oil, thiacloprid and valifenalate in or on certain products

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 10 of 14.1.2019
)


On page 12, in the Annex, in the amendments to the columns for clomazone, fluoxastrobin, lambda-cyhalothrin, mepiquat and thiacloprid in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, in the table, in the heading for the column for lambda-cyhalothrin:
for:


                  ‘Lambda-Cyhalothrin (F) (R)’,

read:


                  ‘Lambda-cyhalothrin (includes gamma-cyhalothrin) (sum of R,S and S,R isomers) (F)’.

On page 17, in the Annex, in the amendments to the columns for clomazone, fluoxastrobin, lambda-cyhalothrin, mepiquat and thiacloprid in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, in the table, in the entry for cotton seeds:
for:












‘0401090 


Cotton seeds


 


0,01 (*)


0,2


0,5 (+)


0,15’





read:












‘0401090 


Cotton seeds


 


0,01 (*)


0,2


5 (+)


0,15’





On page 22, in the Annex, in the amendments to the columns for clomazone, fluoxastrobin, lambda-cyhalothrin, mepiquat and thiacloprid in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, in the footnotes below the table:
for:


                           ‘
                           Lambda-Cyhalothrin (F) (R)








(R)


=


The residue definition differs for the following combinations pesticide-code number:
Lambda-Cyhalothrin - code 1000000 except 1040000: Lambda-cyhalothrin, including other mixed isomeric consituents (sum of isomers)’,





read:


                        ‘
                        Lambda-cyhalothrin (includes gamma-cyhalothrin) (sum of R,S and S,R isomers) (F)
                        ’.
Case T-273/19: Action brought on 24 April 2019 — Target Ventures Group v EUIPO — Target Partners (TARGET VENTURES)
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business administration, business management, consultancy, financial services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019220EN.01004001.xml










1.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 220/40






Action brought on 24 April 2019 — Target Ventures Group v EUIPO — Target Partners (TARGET VENTURES)
(Case T-273/19)
(2019/C 220/51)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Target Ventures Group Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: T. Dolde, P. Homann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Target Partners GmbH (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark TARGET VENTURES — Application for registration No 13 685 565

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 in Case R 1684/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019143EN.01000101.xml










24.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 143/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

23 April 2019
(2019/C 143/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1245 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,82 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4659 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86450 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5070 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1470 




ISK


Iceland króna


135,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5845 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,743 




HUF


Hungarian forint


320,85 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2864 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7611 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,5390 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5814 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5057 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8211 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6889 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5259 




KRW


South Korean won


1 284,26 




ZAR


South African rand


15,9686 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5557 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4245 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 827,34 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6431 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,541 




RUB


Russian rouble


71,6763 




THB


Thai baht


35,945 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,4201 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,2357 




INR


Indian rupee


78,3125 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Corrigendum to Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 87/391/EEC) (OJ L 156, 21.6.1990)
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: accident prevention, occupational health, protective equipment, screen, video display unit work








L_2019109EN.01002901.xml










24.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 109/29







Corrigendum to Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 87/391/EEC)

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 156 of 21 June 1990
)


On page 14, title of the Directive:
for:


                        ‘Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 87/391/EEC)’,

read:


                        ‘Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)’.
Case C-334/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2019 — Eurowings GmbH v GD, HE, IF
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carrier, crew, indemnification, sick leave, strike, vehicle rental








C_2019288EN.01001701.xml










26.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/17






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Stuttgart (Germany) lodged on 24 April 2019 — Eurowings GmbH v GD, HE, IF
(Case C-334/19)
(2019/C 288/22)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Stuttgart

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Eurowings GmbH

Respondents: GD, HE, IF

Question referred

Are the provisions of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, (1) in particular Article 5(3) thereof, to be interpreted as meaning that the spontaneous absence of a significant portion of the flight crew staff — occasioned by their placing themselves on sick leave (‘a wildcat strike’) — of an air carrier that is leasing out an aircraft and crew under a ‘wet lease’ to the ‘operating air carrier’, within the meaning of Article 2(b) of that regulation, but which does not bear operational responsibility for the flights, has as an effect that the ‘operating air carrier’ is also not able to rely on ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Article 5(3) of that regulation, in accordance with the judgment of 17 April 2018, Krüsemann and Others, C-195/17, C-197/17 to C-203/17, C-226/17, C-228/17, C-254/17, C-274/17, C-275/17, C-278/17 to C-286/17 and C-290/17 to C-292/17? (2)



(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

(2)  EU:C:2018:258.
Case T-274/19: Action brought on 24 April 2019 — Target Ventures Group v EUIPO — Target Partners (TARGET VENTURES)
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business administration, business management, consultancy, financial services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019213EN.01006801.xml










24.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/68






Action brought on 24 April 2019 — Target Ventures Group v EUIPO — Target Partners (TARGET VENTURES)
(Case T-274/19)
(2019/C 213/66)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Target Ventures Group Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: T. Dolde, P. Homann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Target Partners GmbH (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark TARGET VENTURES — Application for registration No 13 685 565

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 in Case R 1685/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Cancellation Division and the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;










—


Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-275/19: Action brought on 24 April 2019 — PNB Banka and Others v ECB
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU banking union, bank, banking supervision, equal treatment, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, rights of the defence




C_2019213EN.01006901.xml










24.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/69






Action brought on 24 April 2019 — PNB Banka and Others v ECB
(Case T-275/19)
(2019/C 213/67)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: PNB Banka AS (Riga, Latvia),  CR (*1),  CT (*1) (represented by: O. Behrends, and M. Kirchner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


annul the ECB’s decision of 14 February 2019 to conduct an on-site inspection on the premises of PNB Banka AS and its group companies;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on ten pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that the ECB was not the competent supervisory authority with respect to PNB Banka AS at the time of the decision to conduct the on-site inspection.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision was not ‘necessary’ within the meaning of Article 12 of the SSM Regulation. (1)











3.


Third plea in law, alleging that the ECB failed to duly exercise its discretion pursuant to Article 12(1) of the SSM Regulation.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging that the ECB violated the principle of proportionality.










5.


Fifth plea in law, alleging that the ECB violated the applicants’ rights to be heard.










6.


Sixth plea in law, alleging that the ECB violated its obligation to examine and appraise carefully and impartially all the relevant aspects of the individual case.










7.


Seventh plea in law, alleging that the ECB violated the obligation to provide adequate reasoning for its decision.










8.


Eighth plea in law, alleging that the ECB violated the principles of legitimate expectations and legal certainty.










9.


Ninth plea in law, alleging that the ECB violated the principle of equal treatment and acted in a discriminatory manner with respect to the applicants.










10.


Tenth plea in law, alleging that the ECB violated Article 19 of and recital 75 to the preamble of the SSM Regulation and committed a détournement de pouvoir.






(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63).
Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Brittany, France, Ile-de-France, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2019143EN.01000202.xml










24.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 143/2






Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 143/03)






Member State


France




Route concerned


Quimper — Paris (Orly)




Period of validity of the contract


27 October 2019 – 26 October 2023




Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders


26 June 2019 (12.00, local time)




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained







BRITTANY REGION




283, avenue du Général Patton




CS 21 101




35 711 Rennes Cedex 7




FRANCE




Buyer profile (website): https://www.megalisbretagne.org
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1506 of 10 October 2018 on exceptional market support measures for the eggs and poultrymeat sectors in Italy (OJ L 255, 11.10.2018)
Date: 2019-04-24
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: Italy, aid to agriculture, avian influenza, common organisation of markets, egg, eligibility criteria, market support, poultrymeat, trade restriction, veterinary inspection








L_2019109EN.01002801.xml










24.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 109/28







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1506 of 10 October 2018 on exceptional market support measures for the eggs and poultrymeat sectors in Italy

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 255 of 11 October 2018
)


On page 4, in point (i) of Article 3(1)(d):
for:


                  ‘EUR 0,1815 per broiler falling within the CN code 0105 94 00 up to a maximum of 853 692 animals,’,

read:


                  ‘EUR 0,1815 per week per broiler falling within the CN code 0105 94 00 up to a maximum of 853 692 animals,’.

On page 4, in point (ii) of Article 3(1)(d):
for:


                  ‘EUR 1,2225 per turkey falling within the CN code 0105 99 30 up to a maximum of 48 050 animals.’
               

read:


                  ‘EUR 1,2225 per week per turkey falling within the CN code 0105 99 30 up to a maximum of 48 050 animals.’.