do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-282/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 — The Green Effort Limited v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Fédération internationale de l’automobile (FIA) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Appeals procedure — Time limits — Electronic notification — Calculation of time limits)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, broadcasting, clothing, limitation of legal proceedings, registered trade mark, sporting event, trade-mark law








C_2019206EN.01001501.xml










17.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 206/15






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 — The Green Effort Limited v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Fédération internationale de l’automobile (FIA)
(Case C-282/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - EU trade mark - Appeals procedure - Time limits - Electronic notification - Calculation of time limits)
(2019/C 206/18)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: The Green Effort Limited (represented by: A. Ziehm, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent), Fédération internationale de l’automobile (FIA) (represented by: M. Hawkins, Solicitor, T. Dolde and K. Lüder, Rechtsanwälte)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders The Green Effort Limited to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Fédération internationale de l’automobile (FIA).






(1)  OJ C 285, 13.8.2018.
Case C-292/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 10 April 2019 — PORR Építési Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, financial transaction, tax relief, taxpayer








C_2019220EN.01001901.xml










1.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 220/19






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 10 April 2019 — PORR Építési Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága
(Case C-292/19)
(2019/C 220/24)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: PORR Építési Kft.

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága

Questions referred







1.


Should Article 90(1) and (2) of the VAT Directive (1) be interpreted as meaning that Member States must allow the reduction of the VAT taxable amount where it can be demonstrated definitively that the taxable person has not received all or part of the consideration in respect of the transaction entered into by that person?










2.


Should the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union be interpreted, taking into account, in particular, the judgments in Almos, (C-337/13), paragraph 23, Di Maura, (C-246/16), paragraphs 20 to 29, and, by analogy, T-2, (C-396/16), paragraphs 31 to 45, as meaning that, as regards the obligation of the Member States, laid down in Article 90(1) of the VAT Directive, to reduce a posteriori the taxable amount, a distinction must be made between total or partial non-payment of the consideration by the purchaser and the situation in which the sum due to the seller has become definitively unrecoverable, so that, in the first situation, the Member State may make use of the exception provided for in Article 90(2), whereas in the second situation use of that exception is precluded and the Member State must, in any event, permit the taxable amount to be reduced a posteriori?






(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p.1)
Case C-294/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 10 April 2019 — Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură — Centrul Județean Tulcea v SC Piscicola Tulcea SA
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: agricultural land, aid to agriculture, aquaculture, arable land, eligibility criteria, single payment scheme, utilised agricultural area








C_2019288EN.01001301.xml










26.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 288/13






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanța (Romania) lodged on 10 April 2019 — Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură — Centrul Județean Tulcea v SC Piscicola Tulcea SA
(Case C-294/19)
(2019/C 288/16)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Constanța

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant/defendant at first instance: Agenția de Plăți și Intervenție pentru Agricultură — Centrul Județean Tulcea

Respondent/applicant at first instance: SC Piscicola Tulcea SA

Question referred

Must Articles 2 and 34(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, (1) and Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 of 29 October 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of the single payment scheme provided for in Title III of Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, (2) be interpreted as precluding national legislation which, in the conditions obtaining in the main proceedings, excludes a farmer from payment of the entitlements on the ground that the aquaculture facilities used as arable land do not constitute an ‘agricultural area’ for the purposes of Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1120/2009 since they are not regarded as eligible land under Article 34(2) of Regulation (EC) No 73/2009?


(1)  OJ 2009 L 30, p. 16.

(2)  OJ 2009 L 316, p. 1.
Case T-241/19: Action brought on 10 April 2019 — Spain v Commission
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Gibraltar, State aid, control of State aid, corporation tax








C_2019187EN.01008601.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/86






Action brought on 10 April 2019 — Spain v Commission
(Case T-241/19)
(2019/C 187/93)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, Agent)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Commission Decision of 19 December 2018 on the State aid SA 34914 (2013/C) implemented by the United Kingdom as regards the Gibraltar Corporate Income Tax Regime;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea, alleging infringement of Article 107(1) TFEU on account of misapplication of the criterion of territorial selectivity






—


The applicant submits in that regard that, when it adopted the contested decision, the Commission possessed data and information that showed the existence of territorially selective State aid, which should have led it to have doubts as to the selective scope of the aid. By confining itself to the criterion of material selectivity, the Commission came to incorrect conclusions, given that there is or may be more aid than that actually identified in the contested decision.














2.


Second plea, alleging infringement of Article 296 TFEU, inasmuch as the contested decision is a measure formally lacking a statement of reasons and the appropriate assessment in terms of selectivity






—


The applicant submits in that regard that the Commission fails to state the reasons for which it does not accept the arguments which, concerning territorial selectivity, the Kingdom of Spain had been substantiating throughout the proceedings. The contested decision is a measure materially lacking a statement of reasons, as a result of its incorrect interpretation of the judgment of the General Court of 18 December 2008, Government of Gibraltar v Commission, T-211/04 and T-215/04, EU:T:2008:595. After that judgment was set aside by the Court of Justice (judgment of 15 November 2011, Commission and Spain v Government of Gibraltar and United Kingdom, C-106/09 P and C-107/09 P, EU:C:2011:732), the position set out in Commission Decision 2005/261/EC of 30 March 2004 was reinstated without any reasons being stated for that change of position.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019133EN.01000101.xml










10.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 133/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

9 April 2019
(2019/C 133/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1277 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,51 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4650 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86335 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4250 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1270 




ISK


Iceland króna


133,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,6190 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,618 




HUF


Hungarian forint


321,50 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2870 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7610 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,4056 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5781 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4984 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8440 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6718 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5255 




KRW


South Korean won


1 284,96 




ZAR


South African rand


15,8215 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,5688 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4342 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 937,78 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6220 




PHP


Philippine peso


58,682 




RUB


Russian rouble


73,0029 




THB


Thai baht


35,804 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,3471 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,3479 




INR


Indian rupee


78,1880 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.