do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-293/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 12 February 2019 in Case T-231/18: Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO - Lupu (Djili)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, nut, oleaginous plant, processed foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019399EN.01002001.xml










25.11.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/20






Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 12 February 2019 in Case T-231/18: Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO - Lupu (Djili)
(Case C-293/19 P)
(2019/C 399/23)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam (represented by: C-R Romițan, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 2 October 2019 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded and that Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam shall bear its own costs.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9318 — Colisée/Armonea) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, home care, merger control, social facilities








C_2019141EN.01000102.xml










17.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 141/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9318 — Colisée/Armonea)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 141/02)
On 10 April 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9318. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-51/17: Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019 — Poland v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Fruit and vegetable sector — Aid to producer groups — Expenditure effected by Poland — Weaknesses in key controls — Checks on recognition plans and on recognition criteria — Checks on applications for aid — Economic consistency — Reasonableness of expenditure — Systemic weakness — Risk to EAGF — Flat rate corrections of 25 %)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria, fruit, producer organisation, vegetable








C_2019187EN.01006501.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/65






Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019 — Poland v Commission
(Case T-51/17) (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Fruit and vegetable sector - Aid to producer groups - Expenditure effected by Poland - Weaknesses in key controls - Checks on recognition plans and on recognition criteria - Checks on applications for aid - Economic consistency - Reasonableness of expenditure - Systemic weakness - Risk to EAGF - Flat rate corrections of 25 %)
(2019/C 187/69)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, K. Straś, M. Pawlicka and B. Paziewska, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (initially represented by: K. Skelly and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, and subsequently by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2018 of 15 November 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (JO 2016, L 312, p. 26) concerning the flat rate corrections applied in respect of the Republic of Poland.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action.











2.



Orders the Republic of Poland to pay, in addition to its own costs, three quarters of the costs incurred by the European Commission.











3.



Orders the Commission to pay one quarter of its own costs.







(1)  OJ C 86, 20.3.2017.
Corrigendum to Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation (OJ L 288, 22.10.2016)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia, European Union, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Suriname, Sweden, Trinidad and Tobago, United Kingdom, Uruguay, Venezuela
Subjects: Caribbean Islands, Latin America, agreement (EU), foundation, international organisation








L_2019099EN.01004701.xml










10.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 99/47







Corrigendum to Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 288 of 22 October 2016
)


The publication of Agreement establishing the EU-LAC International Foundation is to be considered null and void.
Case C-295/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Apple Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 31 January 2019 in Case T-215/17: Pear Technologies v EUIPO - Apple (PEAR)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, consultancy, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2019406EN.01000801.xml










2.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 406/8






Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Apple Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 31 January 2019 in Case T-215/17: Pear Technologies v EUIPO - Apple (PEAR)
(Case C-295/19 P)
(2019/C 406/12)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Apple Inc. (represented by: G. Tritton and J. Muir Wood, Barristers, instructed by J. Olsen and P. Andreottola, Solicitors)

Other parties to the proceedings: Pear Technologies Ltd, European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 1 October 2019 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded and that Apple Inc. shall bear its own costs.
Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating, inter alia, in Japan: name change of one company subject to the anti-dumping duty rate for cooperating non-sampled companies
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: Japan, anti-dumping duty, business name, import (EU), originating product, plate, semi-metal








C_2019133EN.01003401.xml










10.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 133/34






Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating, inter alia, in Japan: name change of one company subject to the anti-dumping duty rate for cooperating non-sampled companies
(2019/C 133/04)
Imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating, inter alia, in Japan are subject to a minimum price regime in combination with definitive anti-dumping duties, imposed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1953 (1).
Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation, TARIC additional code C041, a company located in Japan whose exports to the Union of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel are subject to an individual anti-dumping rate of 35,9 %, informed the Commission that it has changed its name as set out below.
The company has asked the Commission to confirm that the change of name does not affect the right of the company to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to the company under its previous name.
The Commission has examined the information supplied and concluded that the change of name in no way affects the findings of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1953.
Therefore, the reference in Article 1(4) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1953 to:






Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation, Tokyo, Japan


C041 





should be read as







Nippon Steel Corporation, Tokyo, Japan


C041 




The TARIC additional code C041 previously attributed to Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation shall apply to Nippon Steel Corporation.


(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1953 of 29 October 2015 imposing a definitive duty on imports of certain grain-oriented flat-rolled products of silicon-electrical steel originating in the People's Republic of China, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and the United States of America (OJ L 284, 30.10.2015, p. 109).
C-834/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro, Juízo do Trabalho de Portimão — Juiz 1– Portugal) — Rolibérica Lda v Autoridade para as Condições do Trabalho (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Road transport — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Article 4(i) — Concept of ‘week’ — Weekly rest periods — Calculation methods)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: road transport, weekly rest period








C_2019280EN.01001301.xml










19.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 280/13






Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro, Juízo do Trabalho de Portimão — Juiz 1– Portugal) — Rolibérica Lda v Autoridade para as Condições do Trabalho
(C-834/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Road transport - Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 - Article 4(i) - Concept of ‘week’ - Weekly rest periods - Calculation methods)
(2019/C 280/16)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro, Juízo do Trabalho de Portimão — Juiz 1

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Rolibérica Lda

Defendant: Autoridade para as Condições do Trabalho

Operative part of the order

Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006, on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85, must be interpreted as meaning that ‘weekly rest period’, within the meaning of Article 8 of that regulation must not necessarily end in the course of the ‘week’, as defined in Article 4(i) of that regulation.


(1)  OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2019
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: European Commission, European Research Council Executive Agency
Subjects: EU expenditure, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts




C_2019134EN.01000101.xml










10.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/1






Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2019 (1)

(2019/C 134/01)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Financial year 2019


Financial year 2018


Financial year 2017





9




EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY





9 2


EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY


51 327 500 


48 808 107 


47 144 647 ,—




9 9


MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE


p.m.


p.m.


0 ,—




 



Title 9 — Total




51 327 500 




48 808 107 




47 144 647 ,—





 



GRAND TOTAL




51 327 500 




48 808 107 




47 144 647 ,—






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2019


Appropriations 2018


Outturn 2017





1




STAFF EXPENDITURE





1 1


REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES


38 500 000 


36 075 700 


33 927 388 ,—




1 2


PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL EXPENDITURE


1 948 550 


1 974 450 


1 714 569 ,—




 



Title 1 — Total




40 448 550 




38 050 150 




35 641 957 ,—






2




INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE





2 1


BUILDING EXPENDITURE


5 808 270 


5 556 190 


4 867 555 ,—




2 2


INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT)


2 101 680 


1 922 635 


3 058 530 ,—




2 3


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURE


265 800 


409 200 


217 171 ,—




 



Title 2 — Total




8 175 750 




7 888 025 




8 143 256 ,—






3




PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE





3 1


PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE


2 703 200 


2 869 932 


3 359 434 ,—




 



Title 3 — Total




2 703 200 




2 869 932 




3 359 434 ,—





 



GRAND TOTAL




51 327 500 




48 808 107 




47 144 647 ,—






Establishment plan










Function group and grade


2019


2018




Permanent posts


Temporary posts


Permanent posts


Temporary posts






AD 16


—


—


—


—




AD 15


—


—


—


—




AD 14


—


10 


—


5 




AD 13


—


5 


—


9 




AD 12


—


3 


—


3 




AD 11


—


1 


—


1 




AD 10


—


13 


—


19 




AD 9


—


58 


—


40 




AD 8


—


9 


—


16 




AD 7


—


17 


—


11 




AD 6


—


10 


—


15 




AD 5


—


1 


—


1 




Total Function Group AD


—


127 


—


120 






AST 11


—


—


—


—




AST 10


—


—


—


—




AST 9


—


—


—


—




AST 8


—


—


—


—




AST 7


—


—


—


—




AST 6


—


—


—


—




AST 5


—


—


—


—




AST 4


—


—


—


—




AST 3


—


—


—


—




AST 2


—


—


—


—




AST 1


—


—


—


—




Total Function Group AST


—


—


—


—







Total staff




—




127 




—




120 







(1)  Detailed budget available on the ERCEA website: http://erc.europa.eu/
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: European Commission, European Research Council Executive Agency
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, financial year, general budget (EU), publication of accounts








C_2019134EN.01001001.xml










10.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/10






Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2018 — amending budget No 1 (1)

(2019/C 134/03)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2018


Amending budget No 1


New amount





9




EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY





9 2


EUROPEAN UNION SUBSIDY


48 600 000 


208 107 


48 808 107 




9 9


MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE


p.m.


 


p.m.




 



Title 9 — Total




48 600 000 




208 107 




48 808 107 





 



GRAND TOTAL




48 600 000 




208 107 




48 808 107 






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2018


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1




STAFF EXPENDITURE





1 1


REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES


35 970 000 


105 700 


36 075 700 




1 2


PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL EXPENDITURE


1 898 700 


75 750 


1 974 450 




 



Title 1 — Total




37 868 700 




181 450 




38 050 150 






2




INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE





2 1


BUILDING EXPENDITURE


5 515 100 


41 090 


5 556 190 




2 2


INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICT)


1 932 100 


–9 465 


1 922 635 




2 3


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND CURRENT OPERATING EXPENDITURE


323 600 


85 600 


409 200 




 



Title 2 — Total




7 770 800 




117 225 




7 888 025 






3




PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE





3 1


PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE


2 960 500 


–90 568 


2 869 932 




 



Title 3 — Total




2 960 500 




–90 568 




2 869 932 





 



GRAND TOTAL




48 600 000 




208 107 




48 808 107 







(1)  Detailed budget available on the ERCEA website: http://erc.europa.eu/
Case C-296/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Etnia Dreams, S.L. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 February 2019 in Case T-823/17, Etnia Dreams v EUIPO — Poisson (Etnik)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, electronic commerce, market research, registered trade mark, retail trade, trade-mark law








C_2019432EN.01001401.xml










23.12.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 432/14






Appeal brought on 10 April 2019 by Etnia Dreams, S.L. against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 February 2019 in Case T-823/17, Etnia Dreams v EUIPO — Poisson (Etnik)
(Case C-296/19 P)
(2019/C 432/16)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Etnia Dreams, S.L. (represented by: P. Gago Comes, abogado)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
By order of 6 November 2019, the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Etnia Dreams, S.L. to bear its own costs.
Case T-303/18 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019 — AV v Commission (Civil service — Temporary agents — Engagement — Article 13 of the CEOS — Pre-engagement medical examination — Incomplete declarations at the medical examination — Failure of the person concerned to declare an illness — Subsequent discovery by the AECE — Retroactive application of medical cover deferment for five years — Referral to the Invalidity Committee — Reasonable time limit — Responsibility — Non-material injury)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: disability insurance, illness, medical examination, servant (EU), temporary employment, worker with disabilities








C_2019187EN.01007501.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/75






Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019 — AV v Commission
(Case T-303/18 RENV) (1)

(Civil service - Temporary agents - Engagement - Article 13 of the CEOS - Pre-engagement medical examination - Incomplete declarations at the medical examination - Failure of the person concerned to declare an illness - Subsequent discovery by the AECE - Retroactive application of medical cover deferment for five years - Referral to the Invalidity Committee - Reasonable time limit - Responsibility - Non-material injury)
(2019/C 187/80)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: AV (represented by: J.-N. Louis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Commission of 16 September 2014 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution decided to apply to the applicant the medical reservation clause provided for in Article 32 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union and not to grant him an invalidity allowance and, second, compensation for the harm he has allegedly suffered in connection with that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Rejects the claims for annulment;











2.



Orders the European Commission to pay AV an amount of EUR 3 000;










3.



Rejects the claim for damages for the remainder;











4.



Orders AV and the Commission each to pay their own costs pertaining to the initial proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union, in the action in Case F-91/15 and in the present appeal proceedings in T-303/18 RENV.







(1)  OJ C 406, 7.12.2015 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-91/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
Case C-214/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Sopocie Wydział I Cywilny — Poland) — proceedings brought by H. W. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2006/112/EC — Value added tax (VAT) — Court enforcement officer — Enforcement — Fees laid down by law — Administrative practice of the competent national authorities considering those fees to be inclusive of VAT — Principles of neutrality and proportionality)
Date: 2019-04-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, enforcement of ruling, legal profession, payment, principle of proportionality








C_2019206EN.01001301.xml










17.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 206/13






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Sopocie Wydział I Cywilny — Poland) — proceedings brought by H. W.
(Case C-214/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2006/112/EC - Value added tax (VAT) - Court enforcement officer - Enforcement - Fees laid down by law - Administrative practice of the competent national authorities considering those fees to be inclusive of VAT - Principles of neutrality and proportionality)
(2019/C 206/15)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Rejonowy w Sopocie

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: H. W.

Other parties: PSM ‘K’, Aleksandra Treder, court enforcement officer at the Sąd Rejonowy w Sopocie

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2013/43/EU of 22 July 2013, and the principles of neutrality of value added tax (VAT) and proportionality must be interpreted as not precluding an administrative practice of the competent national authorities, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which the VAT relating to supplies of services by a court enforcement officer in an enforcement procedure is regarded as included in the fees charged by that officer.


(1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.