do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-108/17: Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 — ClientEarth v Commission (REACH — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) — Request for internal review of a decision on marketing authorisation rejected as unfounded — Error of law — Manifest error of assessment — Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006)
Date: 2019-04-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: chemical product, dangerous substance, health risk, market approval, plastics








C_2019187EN.01006601.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/66






Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 — ClientEarth v Commission
(Case T-108/17) (1)

(REACH - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) - Request for internal review of a decision on marketing authorisation rejected as unfounded - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006)
(2019/C 187/70)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Jones, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara, R. Lindenthal and K. Mifsud-Bonnici, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Chemicals Agency (represented by: M. Heikkilä and W. Broere, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the letter of the Commission of 7 December 2016 by which that institution rejected a request for internal review of 2 August 2016 against Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 3549 final of 16 June 2016, granting an authorisation for uses of bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders ClientEarth to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;











3.



Orders the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) to bear its own costs.







(1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.
Cases T-910/16 and T 911/16: Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 –Hesse and Wedl & Hofmann v EUIPO (TESTA ROSSA) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Proof of use — Outward use of the contested mark — Equal treatment)
Date: 2019-04-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, household article, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019187EN.01006401.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/64






Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 –Hesse and Wedl & Hofmann v EUIPO (TESTA ROSSA)
(Cases T-910/16 and T 911/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA - Partial revocation - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Proof of use - Outward use of the contested mark - Equal treatment)
(2019/C 187/67)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant in Case T-910/16: Kurt Hesse (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Krogmann, lawyer)

Applicant in Case T-911/16: Wedl & Hofmann GmbH (Mils, Austria) (represented by: T. Raubal, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, interveners before the General Court, respectively in Case T-910/16 and Case T-911/16: Wedl & Hofmann GmbH and Kurt Hesse

Re:

Actions brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2016 (Case R 68/2016-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Mr Hesse and Wedl & Hofmann.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Joins Cases T-910/16 and T-911/16 for the purposes of the judgment;











2.



Dismisses the actions;











3.



Orders Mr Kurt Hesse to pay the costs in Case T-910/16;











4.



Orders Wedl & Hofmann GmbH to pay the costs in Case T-911/16.







(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.
Case T-203/19: Action brought on 4 April 2019 — Knaus Tabbert v EUIPO — Carado (CaraTwo)
Date: 2019-04-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, camping vehicle, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, vehicle parts, vehicle rental








C_2019182EN.01003702.xml










27.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 182/37






Action brought on 4 April 2019 — Knaus Tabbert v EUIPO — Carado (CaraTwo)
(Case T-203/19)
(2019/C 182/42)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Knaus Tabbert GmbH (Jandelsbrunn, Germany) (represented by: N. Maenz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Carado GmbH (Leutkirch im Allgäu, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark CaraTwo — Application for registration No 15 170 145

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 January 2019 in Case R 851/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject Carado GmbH’s opposition of 27 July 2016 regarding EU trade mark No 4 935 334 and German trade mark No 30 611 776 (Case B 2 742 768) in its entirety;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-804/17: Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO (Representation of two facing arches) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two facing arches — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2019-04-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, education, medical device, pharmaceutical product, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, teaching materials, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2019172EN.01003301.xml










20.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 172/33






Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO (Representation of two facing arches)
(Case T-804/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing two facing arches - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2019/C 172/45)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Stada Arzneimittel AG (Bad Vilbel, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by D. Hanf and D. Walicka and subsequently by D. Hanf and E. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 September 2017 (Case R 1887/2016-1) relating to an application for registration of a figurative sign representing two facing arches as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders Stada Arzneimittel AG to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 4 April 2019 on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (COM(2019)0151 — C8-0131/2019 — 2019/0056(NLE))
Date: 2019-04-04
Institutions: Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: EU Member State, EU employment policy, education, equal treatment, job access, job creation, manpower needs, poverty, social dialogue, social integration








C_2021116EN.01002101.xml










31.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 116/21






P8_TA(2019)0337
Guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 4 April 2019 on the proposal for a Council decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (COM(2019)0151 — C8-0131/2019 — 2019/0056(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2021/C 116/10)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2019)0151),










—


having regard to Article 148(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0131/2019),










—


having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A8-0177/2019),












1.


Approves the Commission proposal;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.