Case C-427/17: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 March 2019 — European Commission v Ireland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 91/271/EEC — Collection and treatment of urban waste water — Exceptional circumstances — Best technical knowledge not entailing excessive costs — Principle that the costs should be proportionate — Burden of proof — Means of proof)
Date: 2019-03-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Connacht, Leinster, Munster, Ulster-Donegal, infringement of EU law, pollution control measures, principle of proportionality, proof, wastewater, water treatment








C_2019187EN.01001401.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/14






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 March 2019 — European Commission v Ireland
(Case C-427/17) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 91/271/EEC - Collection and treatment of urban waste water - Exceptional circumstances - Best technical knowledge not entailing excessive costs - Principle that the costs should be proportionate - Burden of proof - Means of proof)
(2019/C 187/15)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: K. Mifsud-Bonnici and E. Manhaeve, Agents)

Defendant: Ireland (represented by: J. Quaney, M. Browne and A. Joyce, acting as Agents, S. Kingston, Barrister-at-Law, C. Toland, Senior Counsel, and B. Murray, Senior Counsel)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that Ireland has failed to fulfil its obligations:






—


under Article 3(1) and (2) of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1137/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008, and section A and footnote 1 of Annex I thereto by not ensuring that the waters collected in a combined urban waste water and rainwater system are retained and conducted for treatment in compliance with the requirements of that directive, as amended, so far as concerns the agglomerations of Athlone, Cork City, Enniscorthy apart from the townland of Killagoley, Fermoy, Mallow, Midleton, Ringaskiddy and Roscommon Town;










—


under Article 4(1) and/or (3) of Directive 91/271 as amended by Regulation No 1137/2008, read in conjunction with Article 10 thereof and section B of Annex I thereto, by not putting in place secondary or equivalent treatment so far as concerns the agglomerations of Arklow, Athlone, Ballybofey/Stranorlar, Cobh, Cork City, Enfield, Enniscorthy, Fermoy, Killybegs, Mallow, Midleton, Passage/Monkstown, Rathcormac, Ringaskiddy, Ringsend, Roscommon Town, Shannon Town, Tubbercurry and Youghal;










—


under Article 5(2) and (3) of Directive 91/271 as amended by Regulation No 1137/2008, read in conjunction with Article 10 thereof and section B of Annex I thereto, by not ensuring that urban waste water entering collecting systems from the agglomerations of Athlone, Cork City, Dundalk, Enniscorthy apart from the townland of Killagoley, Fermoy, Killarney, Killybegs, Longford, Mallow, Midleton, Navan, Nenagh, Portarlington, Ringsend, Roscrea and Tralee be, before discharge into sensitive areas, made subject to treatment more stringent than that described in Article 4 of that directive, as amended, and in accordance with the requirements of section B of Annex I thereto; and










—


under Article 12 of Directive 91/271, as amended by Regulation No 1137/2008, by not ensuring that the disposal of waste water from urban waste water treatment plants of the agglomerations of Arklow and Castlebridge is subject to prior regulations and/or specific authorisation;














2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders Ireland to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.