do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-590/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Henri Pouvin, Marie Dijoux, the spouse of Henri Pouvin v Électricité de France (EDF) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 93/13/EEC — Scope — Article 2(b) and (c) — Concepts of ‘consumer’ and of ‘seller or supplier’ — Finance for the purchase of a home — Mortgage loan granted by an employer to its employee and to his spouse, the jointly and severally liable co-borrower)
Date: 2019-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: building subsidy, consumer protection, married person, mortgage, real estate credit, sale, supply, unfair terms of contract, wage earner








C_2019187EN.01002101.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/21






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Henri Pouvin, Marie Dijoux, the spouse of Henri Pouvin v Électricité de France (EDF)
(Case C-590/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 93/13/EEC - Scope - Article 2(b) and (c) - Concepts of ‘consumer’ and of ‘seller or supplier’ - Finance for the purchase of a home - Mortgage loan granted by an employer to its employee and to his spouse, the jointly and severally liable co-borrower)
(2019/C 187/23)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Henri Pouvin, Marie Dijoux, the spouse of Henri Pouvin

Defendant: Électricité de France (EDF)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(b) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that the employee of an undertaking and his spouse, who conclude a loan contract with that undertaking, reserved, principally, to members of staff of that undertaking, with a view to financing the purchase of real estate for private purposes, must be regarded as ‘consumers’, within the meaning of that provision;
Article 2(c) of Directive 93/13 must be interpreted as meaning that that undertaking must be regarded as a ‘seller or supplier’, within the meaning of that provision, where it concludes such a loan contract in the context of its professional activity, even if granting loans does not constitute its main activity.


(1)  OJ C 437, 18.12.2017.
Case C-312/18 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 — Eco-Bat Technologies Ltd, Berzelius Metall GmbH, Société traitements chimiques des métaux v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for car battery recycling — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and imposing fines — Correcting decision adding the value of purchases of the addressees which were not included in the initial decision — Time limit for bringing an action — Point from which time starts to run — Delay — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2019-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cartel, electricity storage device, limitation of legal proceedings, sanction (EU), vehicle parts, waste recycling








C_2019187EN.01003001.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/30






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 — Eco-Bat Technologies Ltd, Berzelius Metall GmbH, Société traitements chimiques des métaux v European Commission
(Case C-312/18 P) (1)

(Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for car battery recycling - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and imposing fines - Correcting decision adding the value of purchases of the addressees which were not included in the initial decision - Time limit for bringing an action - Point from which time starts to run - Delay - Inadmissibility)
(2019/C 187/34)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: Eco-Bat Technologies Ltd, Berzelius Metall GmbH, Société traitements chimiques des métaux (represented by: M. Brealey QC, I. Vandenborre, advocaat, and S. Dionnet, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte, I. Rogalski, J. Szczodrowski and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Eco-Bat Technologies Ltd, Berzelius Metall GmbH and Société de traitements chimiques des métaux (STCM) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.
Case C-245/18: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Udine — Italy) — Tecnoservice Int. Srl, in liquidation v Poste Italiane SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Payment services in the internal market — Directive 2007/64/EC — Article 74(2) — Payment order by credit transfer — Incorrect unique identifier provided by the payer — Execution of the payment transaction on the basis of the unique identifier — Liability of the payee’s payment service provider)
Date: 2019-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: electronic money, intra-EU payment, liability, payment system, provision of services, single market








C_2019187EN.01002801.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/28






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Udine — Italy) — Tecnoservice Int. Srl, in liquidation v Poste Italiane SpA
(Case C-245/18) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Payment services in the internal market - Directive 2007/64/EC - Article 74(2) - Payment order by credit transfer - Incorrect unique identifier provided by the payer - Execution of the payment transaction on the basis of the unique identifier - Liability of the payee’s payment service provider)
(2019/C 187/32)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale Ordinario di Udine

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Tecnoservice Int. Srl, in liquidation

Defendant: Poste Italiane SpA

Operative part of the judgment

Article 74(2) of Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC must be interpreted as meaning that, when a payment order is executed in accordance with the unique identifier provided by the payment service user, which does not correspond to the payee name indicated by that user, the limitation of payment service provider liability, provided for by that article, applies to both the payer’s and the payee’s payment service provider.


(1)  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018.
Case T-777/17: Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2019 –Pan v EUIPO — Entertainment One UK (TOBBIA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark TOBBIA — Earlier EU figurative mark Peppa Pig — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2019-03-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019155EN.01004201.xml










6.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/42






Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2019 –Pan v EUIPO — Entertainment One UK (TOBBIA)
(Case T-777/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark TOBBIA - Earlier EU figurative mark Peppa Pig - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2019/C 155/50)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Xianhao Pan (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Oliva, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Entertainment One UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Guise, L. Cassidy and N. Rose, Solicitors)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Astley Baker Davies Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2017 (Case R 1776/2016-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between, on the one hand, Entertainment One UK and Astley Baker Davies, and, on the other hand, Mr Xianhao.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders Mr Xianhao Pan to pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.
Joined Cases C-266/17 and C 267/17: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Rhein-Sieg-Kreis (C-266/17), Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG (C-267/17) v Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker GmbH, BVR Busverkehr Rheinland GmbH (C-266/17), Kreis Heinsberg (C-267/17) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Article 5(1) and (2) — Direct award — Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and tram — Conditions — Directive 2004/17/EC — Directive 2004/18/EC)
Date: 2019-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, public transport, rail transport, road transport, services contract








C_2019187EN.01001001.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/10






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Rhein-Sieg-Kreis (C-266/17), Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG (C-267/17) v Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker GmbH, BVR Busverkehr Rheinland GmbH (C-266/17), Kreis Heinsberg (C-267/17)
(Joined Cases C-266/17 and C 267/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Transport - Public passenger transport services by rail and by road - Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 - Article 5(1) and (2) - Direct award - Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and tram - Conditions - Directive 2004/17/EC - Directive 2004/18/EC)
(2019/C 187/12)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

(Case C-266/17)

Applicant: Rhein-Sieg-Kreis

Defendants: Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker GmbH, BVR Busverkehr Rheinland GmbH

Intervener: Regionalverkehr Köln GmbH (C-266/17)
Case (C-267/17)

Applicant: Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Kreis Heinsberg

Intervener: WestVerkehr GmbH (C-267/17)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road does not apply to the direct award of contracts for public passenger transport services by bus which do not take the form of service concessions contracts for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors and Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts


(1)  OJ C 283, 28.8.2017.

OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.
Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/467 of 21 March 2019 amending Decision 2011/173/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Date: 2019-03-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Bosnia and Herzegovina, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions








L_2019080EN.01003901.xml










22.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 80/39








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2019/467
of 21 March 2019
         
amending Decision 2011/173/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard t the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/173/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.












(2)


On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 31 March 2020.












(3)


Decision 2011/173/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The second paragraph of Article 6 of Decision 2011/173/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘This Decision shall apply until 31 March 2020.’.



Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 21 March 2019.


For the Council


The President

G. CIAMBA
            





(1)  Council Decision 2011/173/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 68).
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-03-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019107EN.01000801.xml










21.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 107/8






Euro exchange rates (1)

20 March 2019
(2019/C 107/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1354 




JPY


Japanese yen


126,63 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4624 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86280 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,4310 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1338 




ISK


Iceland króna


132,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,6915 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,646 




HUF


Hungarian forint


313,29 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2834 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7615 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,2152 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5999 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5125 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9128 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6567 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5335 




KRW


South Korean won


1 281,96 




ZAR


South African rand


16,3783 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6014 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4178 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 082,94 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6109 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,042 




RUB


Russian rouble


73,0040 




THB


Thai baht


36,032 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,3012 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,5168 




INR


Indian rupee


78,1360 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Joined Cases C-350/17 and C-351/17: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Mobit Soc. cons. arl v Regione Toscana (C-350/17), Autolinee Toscane SpA v Mobit Soc. cons. arl (C-351/17) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Article 5 — Award of public service contracts — Article 5(2) — Direct award — Concept of ‘internal operator’ — Authority exercising similar control — Article 8(2) — Transitional arrangements — Deadline for the expiry of the direct award)
Date: 2019-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: award of contract, carriage of passengers, public institution, public-private partnership, services contract, services of general interest, tendering








C_2019187EN.01001301.xml










3.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 187/13






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Mobit Soc. cons. arl v Regione Toscana (C-350/17), Autolinee Toscane SpA v Mobit Soc. cons. arl (C-351/17)
(Joined Cases C-350/17 and C-351/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 - Public passenger transport services by rail and by road - Article 5 - Award of public service contracts - Article 5(2) - Direct award - Concept of ‘internal operator’ - Authority exercising similar control - Article 8(2) - Transitional arrangements - Deadline for the expiry of the direct award)
(2019/C 187/14)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

(Case C-350/17)

Applicant: Mobit Soc. cons. arl

Defendant: Regione Toscana

Interveners: Autolinee Toscane SpA, Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP) (C-350/17)
(Case C-351/17)

Applicant: Autolinee Toscane SpA

Defendant: Mobit Soc. cons. arl

Interveners: Regione Toscana, Régie Autonome des Transports Parisiens (RATP) (C-351/17)

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5 and Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 must be interpreted as meaning that Article 5 of Regulation No 1370/2007 is not applicable to an award procedure which has been carried out before 3 December 2019, so that a competent authority which awards, by an award decision closing a competitive tendering procedure, before that date, a public service concession contract for the provision of local passenger transport by road, is not required to comply with Article 5 of that regulation.


(1)  OJ C 330, 2.10.2017.