do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-237/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Spain v Commission (EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Spain — Criterion for the recognition of a producer organization — Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 — Financial correction)
Date: 2019-03-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria








C_2019155EN.01004001.xml










6.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/40






Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Spain v Commission
(Case T-237/17) (1)

(EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Spain - Criterion for the recognition of a producer organization - Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 2200/96 - Financial correction)
(2019/C 155/47)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: initially A. Gavela Llopis, M.A. Sampol Pucurull and S. Jiménez García, then M.A. Sampol Pucurull and S. Jiménez García, Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and I. Galindo Martín, Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/264 of 14 February 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2017 L 39, p. 12), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Annuls, inasmuch as it applies a flat-rate correction of 10 %, Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/264 of 14 February 2017 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2017 L 39, p. 12), in so far as it excludes certain expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain;











2.



Dismisses the action as to the remainder;











3.



Declares that the Kingdom of Spain and the European Commission are to bear their own costs.







(1)  OJ C 202, 26.6.2017.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9254 — MUTB/CFSGAM) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-03-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, investment company, merger control








C_2019114EN.01000101.xml










26.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 114/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9254 — MUTB/CFSGAM)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 114/01)
On 20 March 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9254. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-248/19: Action brought on 20 March 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Cyprus
Date: 2019-03-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: infringement of EU law, pollution control measures, urban area, wastewater, water pollution, water protection, water treatment








C_2019213EN.01001001.xml










24.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/10






Action brought on 20 March 2019 — European Commission v Republic of Cyprus
(Case C-248/19)
(2019/C 213/10)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Τriantaphyllou and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Cyprus.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Declare that the Republic of Cyprus, by failing to:






—


provide a collecting system for 31 agglomerations (Αradippou, Ipsonas, Dali, Varoklini, Deryneia, Sotira, Xylophagou, Pervolia, Colosseo, Poli Chrysochous, Livadia, Dromolaxia, Pera Chorio-Nisou, Liopetri, Avgorou, Paliometokhos, Kiti, Frenaros, Ormidia, Kokkinotrimithia, Trachoni, Episkopi, Xylotympou, Pano Pelemidia, Pyla, Lympia, Parekklissia, Kakopetria, Achna, Meneu and Pyrgos), as required by Article 3 of and by Annex I(A) to the Directive;










—


ensure for those same agglomerations that the waste water which enters the collecting systems is subject to secondary or equivalent treatment before discharge, as required by Articles 4, 10 and 15 of and by Annexes I.B and I.D to the Directive,
failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3, 4, 10, 15 and Annex I to Directive 91/271/EEC (1) concerning urban waste-water treatment.














—


order the Republic of Cyprus to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments







1.


In the absence of a comprehensive and operational collecting system, the Republic of Cyprus failed to observe the time limit of 31.12.2012 of Directive 91/271/EEC concerning urban waste-water treatment (as extended by the Treaty of Accession of Cyprus to the European Union) for four agglomerations with populations above 10 000 inhabitants with respect to collection (Article 2) and, consequently, the secondary treatment of waste water (Article 4) and the infrastructure and monitoring of the latter (Articles 10 and 15).










2.


In the absence of a comprehensive and operational collecting system, the Republic of Cyprus failed to observe the time limit of 31.12.2012 of Directive 91/271/EEC concerning urban waste-water treatment (as extended by the Treaty of Accession of Cyprus to the European Union) for agglomerations with a population of 2 000-10 000 inhabitants with respect to collection (Article 2) and, consequently, the secondary treatment of waste water (Article 4) and the infrastructure and monitoring of the latter (Articles 10 and 15).






(1)  Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9285 — SEGRO/PSPIB/Oignies Site) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 81/03
Date: 2019-03-20
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, industrial building, investment company, light industry, logistics, merger control, real estate business, storage








C_2021081EN.01000301.xml










10.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 81/3






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9285 — SEGRO/PSPIB/Oignies Site)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 81/03)
On 20 March 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9285. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.