do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-230/19 P: Appeal brought on 14 March 2019 by Petr Fryč against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 15 January 2019 in Case T-513/18, Fryč v Commission
Date: 2019-03-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, limitation of legal proceedings, small and medium-sized enterprises








C_2019357EN.01000401.xml










21.10.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/4






Appeal brought on 14 March 2019 by Petr Fryč against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 15 January 2019 in Case T-513/18, Fryč v Commission
(Case C-230/19 P)
(2019/C 357/05)
Language of the case: Czech

Parties


Appellant: Petr Fryč (represented by: Š. Oharková, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 5 September 2019, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that this appeal is manifestly unfounded.
Case T-163/19: Action brought on 14 March 2019 — Mersinis v ESMA
Date: 2019-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrator, competition (EU), equal treatment, executive, job vacancy, legal profession, staff regulations (EU)








C_2019164EN.01005601.xml










13.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/56






Action brought on 14 March 2019 — Mersinis v ESMA
(Case T-163/19)
(2019/C 164/59)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Michail Mersinis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: P. Pafitis, lawyer)

Defendant: European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the defendant’s decision of 23 May 2018 not to select the applicant for the post of senior legal officer in respect of the vacancy ESMA/2017/VAC19/AD7.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging unlawful composition of the selection committee.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging the exercise of bias in favour of the candidate selected for the post in question.
Case C-428/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 March 2019 — Meta Group Srl v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Sixth Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2002-2006) — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) — Amounts allegedly owed by the European Commission in relation to the performance of those agreements — Outstanding balance of the total amount of the financial contribution granted to the appellant — Contractual liability)
Date: 2019-03-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU programme, Framework Programme for Research and Development, competitiveness, contractual liability, eligibility criteria, innovation








C_2019155EN.01000502.xml










6.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/5






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 March 2019 — Meta Group Srl v European Commission
(Case C-428/17 P) (1)

(Appeal - Arbitration clause - Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Sixth Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2002-2006) - Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) - Amounts allegedly owed by the European Commission in relation to the performance of those agreements - Outstanding balance of the total amount of the financial contribution granted to the appellant - Contractual liability)
(2019/C 155/06)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Meta Group Srl (represented by: A. Formica, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


dismisses the appeal;










2.


orders Meta Group Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 293, 4.9.2017.