Case T-153/19: Action brought on 11 March 2019 — European Union Copper Task Force v Commission
Date: 2019-03-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: chemical compound, copper, dangerous substance, market approval, plant health control, plant health product, principle of proportionality








C_2019155EN.01005101.xml










6.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/51






Action brought on 11 March 2019 — European Union Copper Task Force v Commission
(Case T-153/19)
(2019/C 155/60)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Union Copper Task Force (Essex, United Kingdom) (represented by: I. Moreno-Tapia Rivas and C. Vila Gisbert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1981, (1) to the extent that it renews the approval of copper compounds as a candidate for substitution on an unlawful legal basis;










—


extend the effects of the annulment to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2015/408, (2) insofar as it implemented Article 80(7) of Regulation 1107/2009 and included copper compounds in the list of active substances as candidates for substitution;










—


declare that Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1981 has infringed the principle of proportionality;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging that Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1981 renews the approval of copper compounds as a candidate for substitution on an unlawful legal basis. In particular:






—


Articles 24 and Annex II, point 4, of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 (3) infringe EU law because:






(i)


Scientific evidence indicates that ‘PBT criteria’, in particular persistence, are not appropriate for copper.










(ii)


Application of PBT criteria to inorganic substances is not consistent with other pieces of legislation that have been implemented in the field of regulated chemical substances.










(iii)


As far as candidates for substitution are concerned, the application of PBT criteria to copper compounds goes beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives pursued by Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009. In addition, Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 misinterprets the precautionary principle.


















2.


Second plea in law, alleging the illegality of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2015/408 in relation to the qualification of copper compounds as candidates for substitution.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging, as a subsidiary plea, that Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1981 has infringed the principle of proportionality.






(1)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1981 of 13 December 2018 renewing the approval of the active substances copper compounds as candidates for substitution, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 (OJ 2018 L 317, p. 16).

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2015/408 of 11 March 2015 on implementing Article 80(7) of Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and establishing a list of candidates for substitution (OJ 2015 L 67, p. 18).

(3)  Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC (OJ 2009 L 309, p. 1).