do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-670/17 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2019 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission (Appeal — European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) — Guidance Section — Reduction of financial assistance — Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 — Operational programme — Financial corrections — Article 39 — Legal basis — Transitional provisions)
Date: 2019-02-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EAGGF, EU aid, financial aid, operational programme, rural development








C_2019139EN.01001701.xml










15.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/17






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 February 2019 — Hellenic Republic v European Commission
(Case C-670/17 P) (1)

(Appeal - European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) - Guidance Section - Reduction of financial assistance - Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 - Operational programme - Financial corrections - Article 39 - Legal basis - Transitional provisions)
(2019/C 139/15)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Appellant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: G. Kanellopoulos, A. Vasilopoulou and I. Pachi, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and J. Aquilina, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 19 September 2017, Greece v Commission (T-327/15, not published, EU:T:2017:631);










2.


Annuls Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 1936 final of 25 March 2015 on applying financial correction on the EAGGF Guidance Section of the operational programme CCI No 2000GR061PO021 (Greece — Objective 1 — Rural Reconstruction);










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Hellenic Republic both in the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.






(1)  OJ C 42, 5.2.2018.
Case T-870/16: Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 –Miserini Johansson v EIB (Civil service — Staff of the EIB — Prolonged or repeated absence on account of a non-occupational accident or disease — Remuneration reduced after 12 months of absence — Article 33 of the EIB Staff Regulations — Procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of the disease)
Date: 2019-02-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, damages, fundamental rights, health expenditure, indemnification, occupational disease, pension scheme








C_2019139EN.01005301.xml










15.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/53






Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 –Miserini Johansson v EIB
(Case T-870/16) (1)

(Civil service - Staff of the EIB - Prolonged or repeated absence on account of a non-occupational accident or disease - Remuneration reduced after 12 months of absence - Article 33 of the EIB Staff Regulations - Procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of the disease)
(2019/C 139/53)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Virna Miserini Johansson (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Senes, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, G. Faedo and K. Carr, acting as Agents, and by J. Currall and B. Wägenbaur, lawyers)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and seeking, primarily, annulment of a decision of the EIB dated 25 January 2016 and compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm associated with that decision and, in the alternative, solely compensation in respect of the material and non-material harm claimed in the main action and reimbursement of the costs incurred in connection with the health problems developed as a result of the severe stress suffered by the applicant and which are allegedly not reimbursed by the EIB’s health insurance scheme.

Operative part of the order







1.



The action is dismissed.











2.



Ms Virna Miserini Johansson shall pay the costs.







(1)  OJ C 86, 20.3.2017.
Case T-107/18: Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2019 –Aytekin v EUIPO — Dienne Salotti (Dienne) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Dienne — Earlier EU figurative mark ENNE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Date: 2019-02-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, furniture industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019139EN.01004901.xml










15.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/49






Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2019 –Aytekin v EUIPO — Dienne Salotti (Dienne)
(Case T-107/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Dienne - Earlier EU figurative mark ENNE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2019/C 139/48)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Erkan Aytekin (Ankara, Turkey) (represented by: V. Martín Santos, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and G. Sakalaite-Orlovskiene, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Dienne Salotti Srl (Altamura, Italy) (represented by: D. Russo, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 December 2017 (Case R 1444/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Aytekin and Dienne Salotti.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.



Dismisses the action;











2.



Orders Mr Erkan Aytekin to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred, in connection with the present proceedings, by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Dienne Salotti Srl.







(1)  OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.
Decision of the General Court of 27 February 2019 on judicial vacations
Date: 2019-02-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: holiday, operation of the Institutions, public holiday




C_2019103EN.01000501.xml










18.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/5






DECISION OF THE GENERAL COURT
of 27 February 2019
on judicial vacations
(2019/C 103/05)
THE GENERAL COURT
Having regard to Article 41(2) of the Rules of Procedure,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1
For the judicial year beginning on 1 September 2019, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 41(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are as follows:






—


Christmas 2019: from Monday 23 December 2019 to Sunday 12 January 2020 inclusive,










—


Easter 2020: from Monday 6 April 2020 to Sunday 19 April 2020 inclusive,










—


Summer 2020: from Thursday 16 July 2020 to Monday 31 August 2020 inclusive.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.


Luxembourg, 27 February 2019.


Registrar

E. COULON



President

M. JAEGER
Case C-190/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 27 February 2019 — MG, NH v Germanwings GmbH
Date: 2019-02-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, travel agency, traveller








C_2019213EN.01000501.xml










24.6.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 213/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 27 February 2019 — MG, NH v Germanwings GmbH
(Case C-190/19)
(2019/C 213/05)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: MG, NH

Defendant: Germanwings GmbH

Question referred

Can a right to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) also exist when a passenger does not catch a directly connecting flight due to a relatively minor delay in arrival, with the result that there is a delay in arrival at the final destination of three hours or more, but the two flights were operated by different air carriers and the booking confirmation was issued by a travel agency who combined the flights for its customer?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-02-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019074EN.01000201.xml










27.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 74/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

26 February 2019
(2019/C 74/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1361 




JPY


Japanese yen


125,93 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4616 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86055 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5858 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1371 




ISK


Iceland króna


136,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,7725 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,663 




HUF


Hungarian forint


317,06 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3282 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7626 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,0254 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5897 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5024 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9178 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6520 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5332 




KRW


South Korean won


1 270,00 




ZAR


South African rand


15,7520 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6077 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4275 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 917,90 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6157 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,144 




RUB


Russian rouble


74,6158 




THB


Thai baht


35,583 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2574 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,7145 




INR


Indian rupee


80,8530 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.