do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9141 — DTC/IRCP/Diamond Transmission Partners) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-02-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical energy, energy transport, holding company, investment company, merger control, subsidiary, wind energy








C_2019058EN.01000202.xml










14.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9141 — DTC/IRCP/Diamond Transmission Partners)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 58/04)
On 4 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9141. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-64/19: Action brought on 4 February 2019 – ECSEL Joint Undertaking v Personal Health Institute International
Date: 2019-02-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU aid, contract terms, eligibility criteria, financial aid, interest, reimbursement of aid, termination of a contract








C_2019112EN.01004501.xml










25.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/45






Action brought on 4 February 2019 – ECSEL Joint Undertaking v Personal Health Institute International
(Case T-64/19)
(2019/C 112/55)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ECSEL Joint Undertaking (represented by: G. Kuyper and P. Brochier, lawyers)

Defendant: Personal Health Institute International (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


order the defendant to pay to ECSEL the amount of EU 25 513,84, together with interest at the contractual rate of 3,5 % from 15 December 2014 until full payment is received.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, based on an alleged breach of contract by the defendant, which, the applicant alleges, failed to provide any detail or information regarding its project to the relevant national funding authority and failed to fulfil its contractual obligations, thus justifying termination of the contract as far as the defendant was concerned pursuant to the relevant provisions of Article II.20.1 of Annex II to the Grant Agreement.
Case C-564/17: Order of the President of the Court of 4 February 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium,supported by: Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Estonia, Ireland, Kingdom of Spain, FrenchRepublic, Italian Republic, Republic of Latvia, Republic of Lithuania, Hungary
Date: 2019-02-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU migration policy, foreign national, infringement of EU law, migrant worker, national implementing measure, periodic penalty payment, residence permit, third country, work permit








C_2019172EN.01002302.xml










20.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 172/23






Order of the President of the Court of 4 February 2019 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium, supported by: Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Estonia, Ireland, Kingdom of Spain, French Republic, Italian Republic, Republic of Latvia, Republic of Lithuania, Hungary
(Case C-564/17) (1)

(2019/C 172/28)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 328, 13.11.2017.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9230 — Allianz/DIF/InfraRed Capital Partners/Daiwater) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-02-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial services, holding company, insurance company, investment company, merger control, parent company, wastewater, water supply








C_2019055EN.01000102.xml










12.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9230 — Allianz/DIF/InfraRed Capital Partners/Daiwater)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 55/02)
On 4 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9230. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9167 — Patron Capital/Marriott International/PEH Warsaw Bidco) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-02-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: catering industry, economic concentration, hotel industry, investment company, merger control, real estate business








C_2019043EN.01001001.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 43/10






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9167 — Patron Capital/Marriott International/PEH Warsaw Bidco)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 43/03)

1.   
On 28 January 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Patron Capital, V L.P. (the ‘Patron Fund’, Jersey), acting through its ultimate general partner, Patron Capital G.P. V Limited (Jersey),










—


Starwood Services Poland sp. z o.o. (Poland), belonging to Marriott International, Inc. (‘Marriott’, United States of America),










—


PEH Warsaw Bidco sp. z o.o. (Poland), which owns the Sheraton Warsaw Hotel.




The Patron Fund and Marriott acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the Sheraton Warsaw Hotel.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares and a pre-existing hotel management agreement.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for the Patron Fund: investment in real estate projects across Europe,
—   for Marriott: a diversified hospitality company, which acts as a manager and franchisor of hotels and timeshare properties,
—   for the Sheraton Warsaw Hotel: a 5-star hotel located in Warsaw.


3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9167 — Patron Capital/Marriott International/PEH Warsaw Bidco
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 February 2019 — Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-02-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest, money








C_2019043EN.01000101.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 43/1






Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
0,00 % on 1 February 2019
Euro exchange rates (2)

1 February 2019
(2019/C 43/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1471 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,91 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4654 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87888 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3878 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1396 




ISK


Iceland króna


137,80 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,6685 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,695 




HUF


Hungarian forint


317,63 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2739 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7557 




TRY


Turkish lira


5,9884 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5789 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5075 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,0012 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6567 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5472 




KRW


South Korean won


1 281,33 




ZAR


South African rand


15,2861 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7262 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4150 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 009,50 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6839 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,916 




RUB


Russian rouble


75,1176 




THB


Thai baht


35,893 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2110 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,9455 




INR


Indian rupee


81,7710 






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9235 — OTPP/MDP/Fleet Complete) (Text with EEA relevance) 2020/C 344/05
Date: 2019-02-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, mobile communication, pension scheme








C_2020344EN.01000501.xml










16.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 344/5






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9235 — OTPP/MDP/Fleet Complete)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2020/C 344/05)
On 4 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9235. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9223 — Stena Rederi/Hyundai Glovis/JV) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-02-04
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: distributor, economic concentration, logistics, maritime transport, merger control, provision of services, shipbuilding, subsidiary








C_2019053EN.01000101.xml










11.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 53/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9223 — Stena Rederi/Hyundai Glovis/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 53/01)
On 4 February 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9223. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.