do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-51/19: Action brought on 29 January 2019 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — SBS Bilimsel Bio Çözümler Sanayi Ve Ticaret (apiheal)
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, plant health product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019103EN.01005701.xml










18.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/57






Action brought on 29 January 2019 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — SBS Bilimsel Bio Çözümler Sanayi Ve Ticaret (apiheal)
(Case T-51/19)
(2019/C 103/73)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: SBS Bilimsel Bio Çözümler Sanayi Ve Ticaret AŞ (Istanbul, Turkey)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark apiheal — Application for registration No 14 411 557

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2018 in Case R 1725/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the contested decision in so far as concerns the partial granting of the application for the following goods: ‘perfumery; cosmetics; fragrances; deodorants for personal use and animals; soaps; bath herbs, not for medical purposes; dental care preparations, dentifrices, denture polishes, tooth whitening preparations, mouth washes, not for medical use’ in Class 3 and ‘preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides’ in Class 5.










—


Refuse EU trade mark application No 14 411 557 apiheal with regard to the aforementioned ‘perfumery; cosmetics; fragrances; deodorants for personal use and animals; soaps; bath herbs, not for medical purposes; dental care preparations, dentifrices, denture polishes, tooth whitening preparations, mouth washes, not for medical use’ in Class 3 and ‘preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides’ in Class 5.










—


Order EUIPO and, if applicable, the intervener to pay the costs.





Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and the Council.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019036EN.01000401.xml










29.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/4







Euro exchange rates (1)


            28 January 2019
         
(2019/C 36/05)


1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1418 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,94 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4652 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86888 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3503 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1331 




ISK


Iceland króna


136,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,7320 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,726 




HUF


Hungarian forint


317,53 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2861 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7646 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,0534 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5913 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5115 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9586 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6687 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5455 




KRW


South Korean won


1 277,22 




ZAR


South African rand


15,5862 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,6997 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4273 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 056,62 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6938 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,956 




RUB


Russian rouble


75,3804 




THB


Thai baht


36,024 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2872 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,7271 




INR


Indian rupee


81,2320 






(1)  
            Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-624/16 TO: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — L’Huillier v Gollnisch and Parliament (Third-party proceedings — Rejection of the third-party applicant’s application to intervene — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, Secretary General of an Institution, abuse of power, admissibility, debt, parliamentary allowance








C_2019103EN.01004301.xml










18.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/43






Order of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — L’Huillier v Gollnisch and Parliament
(Case T-624/16 TO) (1)

((Third-party proceedings - Rejection of the third-party applicant’s application to intervene - Inadmissibility))
(2019/C 103/58)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Third-party applicant: Guillaume L’Huillier (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: A. Varaut, lawyer)

Applicant in the main proceedings: Bruno Gollnisch (Villiers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer)

Defendant in the main proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and L. Vétillard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Third-party application against the judgment of 7 March 2018, Gollnisch v Parliament (T-624/16, not published, under appeal, EU:T:2018:121).

Operative part of the order







1.


The third-party application is dismissed.










2.


Mr Guillaume L’Huillier shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.










3.


Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs.






(1)  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9218 — CVC Capital Partners/K3) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: air conditioning, economic concentration, electrical engineering, heating, investment company, merger control, plumbing equipment, retail selling, wholesale selling








C_2019049EN.01000102.xml










7.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 49/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9218 — CVC Capital Partners/K3)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 49/02)
On 29 January 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9218. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-59/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2019 — Wikingerhof GmbH & Co. KG v Booking.com BV
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: dominant position, injunction, jurisdiction, liability








C_2019155EN.01002201.xml










6.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/22






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 29 January 2019 — Wikingerhof GmbH & Co. KG v Booking.com BV
(Case C-59/19)
(2019/C 155/29)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant in the appeal on a point of law: Wikingerhof GmbH & Co. KG

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Booking.com BV

Question referred

Is Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) to be interpreted as meaning that jurisdiction for matters relating to tort or delict exists in respect of an action seeking an injunction against specific practices if it is possible that the conduct complained of is covered by contractual provisions, but the applicant asserts that those provisions are based on an abuse of a dominant position on the part of the defendant?


(1)  OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9266 — IIF/Kuwait Investment Authority/North Sea Midstream Partners) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy transport, gas industry, investment company, merger control, real estate business








C_2019036EN.01003901.xml










29.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/39







Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9266 — IIF/Kuwait Investment Authority/North Sea Midstream Partners)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 36/12)


1.   
On 22 January 2019, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Kuwait Investment Authority (‘KIA’, Kuwait),










—


IIF Int'l Holding L.P. (‘IIF’, Cayman Islands),










—


North Sea Midstream Partners Limited (‘NSMP’, UK).




KIA and IIF acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of NSMP via a special purpose vehicle, Selkie Investments Midstream Topco Limited. NSMP is currently solely controlled by KIA.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


KIA is a global investor, investing in real estate, private and public equity, fixed income and alternative investment markets across the globe,










—


IIF is a limited partnership investment fund specialised in infrastructure investments, which focuses on long-term investments in infrastructure assets in OECD countries,










—


NSMP owns natural gas transportation and processing assets in and around the UK North Sea.






3.   
On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.
Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.


4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9266 — IIF/Kuwait Investment Authority/North Sea Midstream Partners
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  
            OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

(2)  
            OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5.
Case T-336/17: Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — The GB Foods v EUIPO — Yatecomeré (YATEKOMO) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark YATEKOMO — National figurative mark yatecomeré — Admissibility of new information seeking to substantiate the accuracy of a well-known fact — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019103EN.01002801.xml










18.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/28






Judgment of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — The GB Foods v EUIPO — Yatecomeré (YATEKOMO)
(Case T-336/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark YATEKOMO - National figurative mark yatecomeré - Admissibility of new information seeking to substantiate the accuracy of a well-known fact - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2019/C 103/36)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: The GB Foods, SA (L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: C. Buganza González and E. Torner Lasalle, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Yatecomeré, SL (Ribadumia, Spain) (represented by: J.C. Erdozain López, V. Arnaiz Medina and L. Montoya Terán, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 March 2017 (Case R 1506/2016-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between Yatecomeré and The GB Foods.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders The GB Foods, SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 318, 25.9.2017.
Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/135, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/132, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Tunisia, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2019036EN.01000201.xml










29.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 36/2







Notice for the attention of the persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/135, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/132, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Tunisia
(2019/C 36/03)

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1), as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/135 (2), and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 101/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/132 (4).
The Council of the European Union, after having reviewed the list of designated persons, has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should continue to be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Regulation (EU) No 101/2011.
The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).
The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council before 30 September 2019, together with supporting documentation that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




Any observations received will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s next review, pursuant to Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP and Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) No 101/2011, of the list of designated persons.


(1)  
            OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

(2)  
            OJ L 25, 29.1.2019, p. 32.

(3)  
            OJ L 31, 5.2.2011, p. 1.

(4)  
            OJ L 25, 29.1.2019, p. 12.
Case T-54/19: Action brought on 29 January 2019 — Nosio v EUIPO (BIANCOFINO)
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019112EN.01004401.xml










25.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/44






Action brought on 29 January 2019 — Nosio v EUIPO (BIANCOFINO)
(Case T-54/19)
(2019/C 112/53)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Nosio SpA (Mezzocorona, Italy) (represented by: J. Graffer and A. Ottolini, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Application for EU word mark BIANCOFINO — Application for registration No 16 376 758

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 November 2018 in Case R 2434/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the contested decision;










—


Order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-68/19 P: Appeal brought on 29 January 2019 by Camomilla Srl against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 November 2018 in Case T-44/17 Camomilla v EUIPO — CMT (CAMOMILLA)
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, fancy leather goods and glove-making industry, footwear industry, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019363EN.01000301.xml










28.10.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 363/3






Appeal brought on 29 January 2019 by Camomilla Srl against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 13 November 2018 in Case T-44/17 Camomilla v EUIPO — CMT (CAMOMILLA)
(Case C-68/19 P)
(2019/C 363/05)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Camomilla Srl (represented by: M. Mussi, H.G. Chiappetta, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, CMT Compagnia manifatture tessili Srl
By order of 11 September 2019, the Court (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded, and ordered Camomilla Srl to bear its own costs.
Case C-61/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 29 January 2019 — Orange Romania SA v Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal
Date: 2019-01-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to information, data protection, natural person, personal data








C_2019164EN.01001301.xml










13.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/13






Request for a preliminary ruling from Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 29 January 2019 — Orange Romania SA v Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal
(Case C-61/19)
(2019/C 164/15)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul București

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Orange Romania SA

Defendant: Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal

Questions referred







1.


For the purposes of Article 2(h) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, (1) what conditions must be fulfilled in order for an indication of wishes to be regarded as specific and informed?










2.


For the purposes of Article 2(h) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, what conditions must be fulfilled in order for an indication of wishes to be regarded as freely given?






(1)  Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (OJ 1995 L 281, p. 31).