do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2019031EN.01000201.xml










25.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 31/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

24 January 2019
(2019/C 31/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1341 




JPY


Japanese yen


124,43 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4659 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87085 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2843 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1283 




ISK


Iceland króna


135,90 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,7278 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,695 




HUF


Hungarian forint


318,42 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2881 




RON


Romanian leu


4,7722 




TRY


Turkish lira


5,9895 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5967 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5160 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,8988 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6731 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5430 




KRW


South Korean won


1 281,18 




ZAR


South African rand


15,6360 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7041 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4356 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 064,53 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,6986 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,905 




RUB


Russian rouble


74,7868 




THB


Thai baht


35,985 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2869 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,6031 




INR


Indian rupee


80,6560 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-58/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by Mykola Yanovych Azarov against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-247/17, Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Ukraine, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2020077EN.01001101.xml










9.3.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 77/11






Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by Mykola Yanovych Azarov against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 13 December 2018 in Case T-247/17, Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union
(Case C-58/19 P)
(2020/C 77/14)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Mykola Yanovych Azarov (represented by: A. Egger and G. Lansky, Rechtsanwälte)

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
By order of 22 October 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) ordered as follows:






1.


The appeal is manifestly well founded.










2.


The judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 13 December 2018, Azarov v Council (T-247/17, not published, EU:T:2018:931) is set aside.










3.


Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/381 of 3 March 2017 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine und Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/374 of 3 March 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine are annulled to the extent to which they concern Mr Mykola Yanovych Azarov.










4.


The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs of the proceedings both at first instance and on appeal.
Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Eurocontrol, air traffic, air traffic control, exchange of information, trans-European network








C_2019031EN.01000401.xml










25.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 31/4






Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)


(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 31/06)









Organisation


Reference


Edition number


Title of the Community specifications


Edition date




Eurocontrol (2)



Spec-0106


4.3


Eurocontrol Specification for On-Line Data Interchange (OLDI) (3)



18.12.2017






(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

(2)  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: Rue de la Fusée 96, B-1130 Brussels, phone +32 27299011, fax +32 27299044.

(3)  http://www.eurocontrol.int/publications/eurocontrol-specification-line-data-interchange-oldi
Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Eurocontrol, air traffic, air traffic control, exchange of information, trans-European network








C_2019031EN.01000302.xml










25.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 31/3






Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)


(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 31/05)








Organisation


Reference and title of the Community specification


Reference of superseded Community specification


Date of cessation of presumption of conformity of superseded Community specification




Eurocontrol (2)



Spec-0101, Edition 1.3 Eurocontrol Specification for the Initial Flight Plan (IFPL) (3)



Spec-0101 Edition 1.2


26.2.2018






(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

(2)  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: Rue de la Fusée 96, 1130 Brussels, Belgium, tel. +32 27299011, fax +32 27295190.

(3)  https://www.eurocontrol.int/publications/eurocontrol-specification-initial-flight-plan-ifpl
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9174 — Aunde/Brose/JV) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor car, textile industry, vehicle parts








C_2019046EN.01000101.xml










5.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9174 — Aunde/Brose/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 46/01)
On 25 January 2019, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32019M9174. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-46/19: Action brought on 25 January 2019 — Hellenic Republic v Commission
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: agricultural expenditure, aid per hectare, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria, grassland, principle of proportionality, single payment scheme








C_2019093EN.01007801.xml










11.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/78






Action brought on 25 January 2019 — Hellenic Republic v Commission
(Case T-46/19)
(2019/C 93/100)
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: G. Kanellopoulos, E. Leftheriotou and A-E. Vasilopoulou, as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far as that decision imposed on the Hellenic Republic one-off and flat-rate financial corrections, amounting to a gross sum of EUR 25 092 988,84 and a net sum of EUR 24 851 438,56, following the inquiry ΑΑ/2016/013/GR with respect to area-based payments for the claim years 2015/2016 (financial years 2016 and 2017, pages 63-74 of the summary report); and order the defendant to pay the legal costs of the Hellenic Republic.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law:






1.


The first plea in law is based on an infringement by the Commission of Article 4(1)(h) of Regulation No 1307/2013, (1) with respect to the interpretation and application of the term ‘permanent grassland’.










2.


The second plea in law is based on defective reasoning with respect to an infringement of Article 296 TFEU, infringement of Article 18(5) of Regulation No 640/2014, (2) of the LPIS quality assurance guidelines (Executable Test Suite (ETS) LPIS data quality measures, version 6.0), and of the principle of proportionality.










3.


The third plea in law is based on a defective statement of reasons by the defendant as to the imposition of one-off corrections in addition to the flat-rate correction.






(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 (OJ 2013, L 347, p. 608).

(2)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the integrated administration and control system and conditions for refusal or withdrawal of payments and administrative penalties applicable to direct payments, rural development support and cross compliance (OJ 2014, L 181, p. 48).
Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Eurocontrol, air traffic, air traffic control, exchange of information, trans-European network








C_2019031EN.01000301.xml










25.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 31/3






Commission communication concerning the implementation of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the interoperability of the European Air Traffic Management network (1)


(Publication of titles and references of Community specifications under the Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 31/04)









Organisation


Reference


Edition number


Title of the Community specifications


Edition date




Eurocontrol (2)



Spec-0107


3.2


Eurocontrol Specification for ATS Data Exchange Presentation (ADEXP) (3)



18.12.2017






(1)  OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 26.

(2)  European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation: Rue de la Fusée 96, 1130 Brussels, Belgium, tel. +32 27299011, fax +32 27299044.

(3)  http://www.eurocontrol.int/publications/eurocontrol-specification-ats-data-exchange-presentation-adexp
Decision No 3/JP/2018 of 25 January 2019 of the Joint Committee set up under the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Japan related to the registration of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment and Radio Equipment [2019/347]
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: European Union, Japan, Joint Committee
Subjects: EC conformity marking, Japan, agreement (EU), approval, mutual recognition principle, radio equipment, telecommunications equipment








L_2019062EN.01001601.xml










1.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 62/16








            DECISION No 3/JP/2018
of 25 January 2019
         
of the Joint Committee set up under the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Japan related to the registration of Conformity Assessment Bodies under the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment and Radio Equipment [2019/347]


THE JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on Mutual Recognition between the European Community and Japan and in particular Article 8(3)(a) and 9(1)(b) thereof;


Whereas the Joint Committee is to take a decision to list a Conformity Assessment Body or Bodies under a Sectoral Annex;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:








1.


The Conformity Assessment Body indicated below is registered under the Sectoral Annex on Telecommunications Terminal Equipment and Radio Equipment of the Agreement, for the products and conformity assessment procedures as indicated below.





Name, acronym and contact details of the Conformity Assessment Body:
Name: CETECOM GmbH
Address: Im Teelbruch 116, D-45219 Essen, GERMANY
               
Telephone number: +49 2054 9519 404
Fax number: +49 2054 9519 150
E-mail address: francis.lima@cetecom.com
URL address: http://www.cetecom.com
Contact person of the designated CAB: Francis Lima









Scope of registration in terms of products and conformity assessment procedures:
For Radio Law:
Specified Radio Equipment specified in Article 38-2-2, paragraph (1), items i), ii), iii) of the Radio Law














2.


This decision, done in duplicate, shall be signed by the Co-Chairs. The decision shall be effective from the date of the later of these signatures.









On behalf of Japan

Kyoichiro KAWAKAMI
            
Signed in Tokyo on 25 January 2019
            



On behalf of the European Union

Ignacio IRUARRIZAGA
            
Signed in Brussels on 16 January 2019
Case C-48/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 25 January 2019 — X-GmbH v Z Tax Office
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, consultancy, health care, nursing staff, professional qualifications, provision of services, service, tax exemption








C_2019148EN.01001401.xml










29.4.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 148/14






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 25 January 2019 — X-GmbH v Z Tax Office
(Case C-48/19)
(2019/C 148/14)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: X-GmbH

Defendant: Z Tax Office

Questions referred







1.


In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, in which a taxable person advises insured persons on various topics relating to healthcare and medical conditions by telephone on behalf of health insurance funds, does this constitute an activity that falls within the scope of Article 132(1)(c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax? (1)











2.


In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, is it sufficient, in relation to the services referred to in question 1 and in respect of turnover in the context of ‘patient support programmes’, for the required evidence of professional qualifications if the consultations over the telephone are conducted by ‘health coaches’ (medical assistants, nurses) and a doctor is consulted in approximately one third of the cases?






(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.
Case C-46/19 P: Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 15 November 2018 in Case T-316/14: Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) v Council
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, terrorism








C_2019103EN.01001702.xml










18.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/17






Appeal brought on 25 January 2019 by Council of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 15 November 2018 in Case T-316/14: Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) v Council
(Case C-46/19 P)
(2019/C 103/18)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, S. Van Overmeire, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), European Commission, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the contested judgment of the General Court;










—


give final judgment in the matters that are the subject of this appeal and to dismiss PKK's application; and










—


order the PKK to pay the costs of the Council arising from the present appeal and from Case T-316/14.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Council submits that the General Court erred in the contested judgment on the following points:






—


first plea: the General Court wrongly characterised the contested decisions as purely Article 1(6) decisions (1);










—


second plea: the General Court wrongly concluded that the U.S. decisions cannot serve as a basis for the initial listing;










—


third plea: the General Court wrongly found that the Council had failed to explain why it considered the U.S. decisions and the Order of the UK Home Secretary to be a decision of a competent authority within the meaning of Article 1(4) of CP931;










—


fourth plea: the General Court wrongly applied the Court of Justice's LTTE (2) judgment, point 55, to the case at hand;










—


fifth plea: the General Court wrongly applied LTTE, point 71 to the case at hand;










—


sixth plea: the General Court wrongly applied Article 1(4) of CP931 and point 55 of the LTTE judgment;










—


seventh plea: the General Court wrongly held that the Council could not respond to the PKK's letter in its own letter of 27 March 2015.






(1)  Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2001, L 344, p. 93).

(2)  Case C-599/14 P, Council v. LTTE, EU:C2017:583
Notice concerning the provisional application of the Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Japan, of the other part
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Japan, cooperation agreement (EU), cooperation policy, interim agreement (EU)








L_2019023EN.01000101.xml










25.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 23/1







Notice concerning the provisional application of the Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Japan, of the other part (1)


The European Union and Japan have notified each other of the completion of the procedures necessary for the provisional application of the Strategic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Japan, of the other part, on 21 December 2018. Consequently, Japan and the Union may provisionally apply mutually determined provisions of the Agreement in accordance with (Article 47(2)) as from 1 February 2019.
By virtue of Article 4 of Council Decision (EU) 2018/1197 of 26 June 2018 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Strategic Partnership Agreement, the following parts of the Agreement shall be applied provisionally between the Union and Japan:






(a)


Articles 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 28, 40 and 41;










(b)


Article 13, Article 15 (with the exception of point (b) of paragraph 2), Articles 17, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31 and 37, Article 38(1) and Article 39 to the extent that they cover matters for which the Union has already exercised its competence internally;










(c)


Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5(1) to the extent that they cover matters falling within the Union's competence to define and implement a common foreign and security policy;










(d)


Article 42 (with the exception of point (c) of paragraph 2), Articles 43-47, Article 48(3) and Articles 49, 50 and 51 to the extent that these provisions are limited to the purpose of ensuring the provisional application of the Agreement.






(1)  
            OJ L 216, 24.8.2018, p. 4.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.9178 — Cargill/ADM/GrainBridge/JV) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agro-industry, economic concentration, farming sector, food production, information technology industry, merger control








C_2019031EN.01000102.xml










25.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 31/1






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.9178 — Cargill/ADM/GrainBridge/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 31/02)
On 13 December 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between Cargill and ADM. On 21 January 2019, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.