do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to First Commission Directive 79/796/EEC of 26 July 1979 Laying down Community methods of analysis for testing certain sugars intended for human consumption (OJ L 239, 22.9.1979)
Date: 2019-01-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: analytical chemistry, food inspection, human nutrition, sugar








L_2019009EN.01019801.xml










11.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 9/198







Corrigendum to First Commission Directive 79/796/EEC of 26 July 1979 Laying down Community methods of analysis for testing certain sugars intended for human consumption

(
Official Journal of the European Communities L 239 of 22 September 1979
)


On page 24 and on the cover page, the title of the Directive:
for:


                        ‘
                        FIRST COMMISSION DIRECTIVE


of 26 July 1979
                        


Laying down Community methods of analysis for testing certain sugars intended for human consumption

(79/786/EEC)’
                     

read:


                        ‘
                        FIRST COMMISSION DIRECTIVE


of 26 July 1979
                        


laying down Community methods of analysis for testing certain sugars intended for human consumption

(79/796/EEC)’
Case C-18/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 11 January 2019 — WM v City of Frankfurt am Main
Date: 2019-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: foreign national, illegal migration, imprisonment, penal institution, removal, return migration








C_2019112EN.01002702.xml










25.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/27






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 11 January 2019 — WM v City of Frankfurt am Main
(Case C-18/19)
(2019/C 112/33)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: WM

Authority involved: City of Frankfurt am Main

Question referred

Does Article 16(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (1) preclude national provisions under which custody awaiting deportation may be enforced in an ordinary custodial institution if the foreign national poses a significant threat to the life and limb of others or to significant internal security interests, in which case the detainee awaiting deportation is accommodated separately from prisoners serving criminal sentences?


(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.
Case C-313/18: Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt — Sweden) — Dacom Limited v IPM Informed Portfolio Management AB
Date: 2019-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: copyright, data-processing law, industrial property, injunction, software, staff, wage earner








C_2019112EN.01004001.xml










25.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/40






Order of the President of the Court of 11 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Svea hovrätt — Sweden) — Dacom Limited v IPM Informed Portfolio Management AB
(Case C-313/18) (1)

(2019/C 112/46)
Language of the case: Swedish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.
Case C-27/19 P: Appeal brought on 11 January 2019 by the Court of Auditors of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 8 November 2018 in Case T-874/16, RA v Court of Auditors
Date: 2019-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrator, pay scale, promotion, staff assessment, staff regulations (EU)








C_2019238EN.01000401.xml










15.7.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 238/4






Appeal brought on 11 January 2019 by the Court of Auditors of the European Union against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 8 November 2018 in Case T-874/16, RA v Court of Auditors
(Case C-27/19 P)
(2019/C 238/05)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Court of Auditors of the European Union (represented by: E. von Bardeleben, C. Lesauvage, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: RA
By order of 24 April 2019, the Court (Ninth Chamber) removed the case from the register of the Court.
Case C-19/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 11 January 2019 — État belge v Pantochim SA, in liquidation
Date: 2019-01-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, application of EU law, bankruptcy, claim, judicial cooperation, redemption








C_2019103EN.01001501.xml










18.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/15






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (Belgium) lodged on 11 January 2019 — État belge v Pantochim SA, in liquidation
(Case C-19/19)
(2019/C 103/14)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant on a point of law: État belge

Respondent in the appeal on a point of law: Pantochim SA, in liquidation

Questions referred







—


Must the provision according to which the claim in respect of which a request for recovery has been made ‘shall be treated as a claim of the Member State in which the requested authority is situated’, as provided for in [the second paragraph of] Article 6 of Council Directive 2008/55/EC on mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to certain levies, duties, taxes and other measures, (1) which replaces Article 6(2) of Council Directive 76/308/EEC of 15 March 1976 on mutual assistance for the recovery of claims relating to certain levies, duties, taxes and other measures, (2) be understood as meaning that the claim of the requesting State is to be treated as being a claim of the requested State, with the result that the claim of the requesting State acquires the status of a claim of the requested State?










—


Must the term ‘privilege’ referred to in Article 10 of Council Directive 2008/55/EC of 26 May 2008, and, before codification, in Article 10 of Council Directive 76/308/EEC of 15 March 1976, be understood as the preferential right attached to the claim which confers on it a right of priority over other claims in the event of concurrence, or as any mechanism which results, in the event of concurrence, in the preferential payment of the claim?










—


Must the option available to the tax authority to carry out, under the conditions laid down by Article 334 of the Programme-Law of 27 November 2004, a set-off in the event of concurrence be regarded as a privilege within the meaning of Article 10 of the abovementioned directives?






(1)  OJ 2008 L 150, p. 28.

(2)  OJ 1976 L 73, p. 18. Directive 2008/55/EC indicates (footnote 3) that the original title of Directive 76/308/EEC was amended by Directive 79/1071/EEC (OJ L 331, p. 10), Directive 92/12/EEC (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1) and Directive 2001/44/EC (OJ 2001 L 175, p. 17).
Corrigendum to Passenger Name Records (PNR) — List of Member States who have decided the application of the PNR Directive to intra-EU flights as referred to in Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime (If a Member State decides to apply this Directive to intra-EU flights, it shall notify the Commission in writing. A Member State may give or revoke such a notification at any time. The Commission shall publish that notification and any revocation of it in the Official Journal of the European Union) (OJ C 196, 8.6.2018)
Date: 2019-01-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, air safety, air transport, data collection, data protection, data transmission, personal data, protection of privacy, terrorism, traveller








C_2019011EN.01000901.xml










11.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 11/9






Corrigendum to Passenger Name Records (PNR)
List of Member States who have decided the application of the PNR Directive to intra-EU flights as referred to in Article 2 of Directive (EU) 2016/681 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of passenger name record (PNR) data for the prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime
(If a Member State decides to apply this Directive to intra-EU flights, it shall notify the Commission in writing. A Member State may give or revoke such a notification at any time. The Commission shall publish that notification and any revocation of it in the Official Journal of the European Union)
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 196 of 8 June 2018
)
(2019/C 11/06)
On page 29:
The following Member States that have notified the Commission of the application of the PNR Directive in intra-EU flights are added:






—


Greece










—


Cyprus










—


Romania.
Case T-24/19: Action brought on 11 January 2019 — INC and Consorzio Stabile Sis v Commission
Date: 2019-01-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, State aid, control of State aid, motorway, toll








C_2019093EN.01007301.xml










11.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/73






Action brought on 11 January 2019 — INC and Consorzio Stabile Sis v Commission
(Case T-24/19)
(2019/C 93/94)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: INC SpA (Turin, Italy) and Consorzio Stabile Sis SCpA (Turin) (represented by: H.-G. Kamann, F. Louis and G. Tzifa, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


annul Commission decision C(2018) 2435 final of 27 April 2018 in Cases SA. 49335 (2017/N) and SA.49336 (2017/N); (1)











—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on one plea in law for each of the two separate instances of alleged State aid.






1.


Plea in law in respect of Case SA.49336 (2017/N), alleging that, by adopting the contested decision, the Commission failed to open the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU and Articles 4(4) and 6 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589, (2) despite the existence of serious difficulties encountered during the preliminary examination procedure as regards the compatibility of the notified individual State aid in relation to an Italian toll motorway operator (Autostrade per l'Italia SpA) with the internal market. The applicants allege that the Commission thereby breached Article 108(3) TFEU and Article 4(3) of Regulation 2015/1589.










2.


Plea in law in respect of Case SA.49335 (2017/N), alleging that, by adopting the contested decision, the Commission failed to open the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU and Articles 4(4) and 6 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589, despite the existence of serious difficulties encountered during the preliminary examination procedure as regards the compatibility of the notified individual State aid in relation to a second Italian toll motorway operator (Società Iniziative Autostradali e Servizi Spa) with the internal market. The applicants allege that the Commission thereby breached Article 108(3) TFEU and Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589.






(1)  OJ 2018 C 379, p. 3.

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9).
Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership
Date: 2019-01-11
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Japan, cooperation agreement (EU), economic cooperation








L_2019009EN.01000101.xml










11.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 9/1







Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership

The Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership (1), signed in Tokyo on 17 July 2018, will enter into force on 1 February 2019.


(1)  
            OJ L 330, 27.12.2018, p. 3.