Case C-410/17: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — procedure initiated by A Oy (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(a) and (c) — Article 14(1) — Article 24(1) — Transactions for consideration — Transactions for consideration constituted partly by services or goods — Demolition contract — Purchase contract for dismantling)
Date: 2019-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, building industry, metal waste, provision of services, purchase, purchase price, taxpayer, waste disposal








C_2019072EN.01000201.xml










25.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/2






Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 10 January 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — procedure initiated by A Oy
(Case C-410/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2(1)(a) and (c) - Article 14(1) - Article 24(1) - Transactions for consideration - Transactions for consideration constituted partly by services or goods - Demolition contract - Purchase contract for dismantling))
(2019/C 72/02)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Korkein hallinto-oikeus

Party to the main proceedings

A Oy

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 2(1)(a) and (c) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, read together with Article 14(1) and Article 24(1) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that, where, pursuant to a demolition contract, the service provider, namely a demolition company, is required to carry out demolition works and may, in so far as the demolition waste contains scrap metal, resell that scrap metal, that contract consists of a supply of services for consideration, that is to say the performance of demolition works, and also a supply of goods for consideration, that is the supply of the scrap metal, if the purchaser, that is to say the demolition company, attributes a value to that supply of goods, which it factors in when calculating the price quoted for the performance of the demolition works, that supply of goods being, however, subject to value added tax only if it is made by a taxable person acting as such.










2.


Article 2(1)(a) and (c) of Directive 2006/112, read together with Article 14(1) and Article 24(1) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that, where, pursuant to a purchase contract for dismantling, the purchaser, namely a demolition company, purchases goods to be dismantled and undertakes, subject to a contractual penalty, to demolish or dismantle and dispose of those goods and to dispose of the waste within a period fixed in the contract, that contract consists of a supply of goods for consideration, that is the supply of goods to be dismantled, which is subject to value added tax only if it is made by a taxable person acting as such, which is for the referring court to ascertain. In so far as the purchaser is required to demolish or dismantle and dispose of those goods and to dispose of the resulting waste, thereby specifically meeting the needs of the seller, which is for the referring court to ascertain, that contract also includes a supply of services for consideration, that is the performance of demolition works or dismantling and waste disposal, if that purchaser attributes a value to that supply of goods which it factors in to the price quoted as a factor reducing the purchase price of the goods to be dismantled, which is for the referring court to ascertain.






(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.