do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali apply
Date: 2019-01-10
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Mali, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data, removal








C_2019009EN.01000301.xml










10.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/3






Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Mali apply
(2019/C 9/04)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1).
The legal basis for this processing operation are Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2019/29 (3).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of RELEX (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is RELEX.1.C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775, as implemented by Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2019/29.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in Decision (CFSP) 2017/1775.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions pursuant to Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725, the exercise of the rights of the data subjects such as the right of access, as well as the rights to rectification or to object will be answered in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Without prejudice to any judicial, administrative or non-judicial remedy, data subjects may lodge a complaint with the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725.


(1)  OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 251, 29.9.2017, p. 23.

(3)  OJ L 8, 10.1.2019, p. 30.
Case C-30/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 10 January 2019 — Diskrimineringsombudsmannen v Braathens Regional Aviation AB
Date: 2019-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, equal treatment, indemnification, racial discrimination








C_2019103EN.01001601.xml










18.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/16






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 10 January 2019 — Diskrimineringsombudsmannen v Braathens Regional Aviation AB
(Case C-30/19)
(2019/C 103/16)
Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta domstolen

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Diskrimineringsombudsmannen

Opposing party: Braathens Regional Aviation AB

Question referred

In a case concerning an infringement of a prohibition laid down in Directive 2000/43/EC (1) where the person wronged claims compensation for discrimination, must a Member State, if so requested by the person wronged, always examine whether discrimination has occurred — and where appropriate conclude that that was the case — regardless of whether the person accused of discrimination has or has not admitted that discrimination has occurred, in order for the requirement in Article 15 for effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions to be regarded as satisfied?


(1)  Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin (OJ 2000 L 180, p. 22).
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/55 of 10 January 2019 correcting the Bulgarian and French language versions of Decision 2004/558/EC implementing Council Directive 64/432/EEC as regards additional guarantees for intra-Community trade in bovine animals relating to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and the approval of the eradication programmes presented by certain Member States (notified under document C(2019) 8) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-01-10
Institutions: Directorate-General for Translation, European Commission
Subjects: animal disease, cattle, health certificate, health control, intra-EU trade








L_2019010EN.01007401.xml










14.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 10/74








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2019/55
of 10 January 2019
         
correcting the Bulgarian and French language versions of Decision 2004/558/EC implementing Council Directive 64/432/EEC as regards additional guarantees for intra-Community trade in bovine animals relating to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and the approval of the eradication programmes presented by certain Member States


(notified under document C(2019) 8)


(Text with EEA relevance)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Directive 64/432/EEC of 26 June 1964 on animal health problems affecting intra-Community trade in bovine animals and swine (1), and in particular Articles 9(2) and 10(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


The Bulgarian and French language versions of Commission Decision 2004/558/EC (2) contain an error in Article 3(1)(b). The Bulgarian and French versions refer to blood samples from bovine animals for breeding and production to be taken less than 21 days after their arrival at the isolation facility, whereas the correct guarantee for blood samples to be taken is not earlier than 21 days after their arrival at the isolation facility.












(2)


The Bulgarian and French language versions of Decision 2004/558/EC should therefore be corrected accordingly. The other language versions are not affected.












(3)


The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1

(does not concern the English language)



Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.




Done at Brussels, 10 January 2019.


For the Commission

Günther OETTINGER
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ 121, 29.7.1964, p. 1977.

(2)  Commission Decision 2004/558/EC of 15 July 2004 implementing Council Directive 64/432/EEC as regards additional guarantees for intra-Community trade in bovine animals relating to infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and the approval of the eradication programmes presented by certain Member States (OJ L 249, 23.7.2004, p. 20).
Case T-16/19: Action brought on 10 January 2019 — Activos e Inversiones Monterroso v SRB
Date: 2019-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, provision of documents








C_2019072EN.01004502.xml










25.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/45






Action brought on 10 January 2019 — Activos e Inversiones Monterroso v SRB
(Case T-16/19)
(2019/C 72/58)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Activos e Inversiones Monterroso, SL (Pantoja, Spain) (represented by: S. Rodríguez Bajón, lawyer)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:
Take note of the present action for annulment of the decision adopted by the Single Resolution Board of 31 October 2018, in the framework of this procedure [Ares (2017) 61995390] and, the appropriate legal steps having been taken, give judgment annulling the decision of 31 October 2018 and upholding the form of order sought, granting access to all documents included in the relevant administrative file.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. (1)







—


In that connection, the applicant argues that, in the present case, protection of the public interest as regards the economic or monetary policy of the European Union or a Member State, protection of the commercial interests of a natural or legal person, protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual, protection of the purpose of investigations, or the opposition of the originator of the information, are not applicable as exceptions to the disclosure of documents.






(1)  OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43.
Case C-14/19 P: Appeal brought on 10 January 2019 by the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 25 October 2018 in Case T-286/15: KF v SatCen
Date: 2019-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative procedure, disciplinary proceedings, dismissal, equal treatment, jurisdiction, right to justice, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU)








C_2019164EN.01000801.xml










13.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/8






Appeal brought on 10 January 2019 by the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 25 October 2018 in Case T-286/15: KF v SatCen
(Case C-14/19 P)
(2019/C 164/09)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) (represented by: A. Guillerme, avocate)

Other parties to the proceedings: KF, Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the judgment under appeal;










—


order the applicant in first instance to bear all the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In its appeal, SatCen relies on the following grounds:






—


the General Court erred in law in the finding that it has jurisdiction to rule on the heads of claim submitted by the applicant, as it (i) did not assess if the factors forming the basis of the Court’s jurisdiction were met and it (ii) erroneously interpreted the principle of equal treatment.










—


the General Court erred in law in the finding that the General Court’s jurisdiction to rule on this dispute is based on article 263 and 268 TFEU;










—


the General court distorted the facts in examining KF’s claims as regards the conduct of the administrative inquiry;










—


the General Court erred in law interpreting article 1, annex IX of the SatCen’s Staff Regulations and the concept of the rights of the defence.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9221 — CMA CGM/CEVA) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2019-01-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: air transport, carriage of goods, economic concentration, land transport, logistics, maritime transport, merger control, port traffic, provision of services, storage








C_2019009EN.01001001.xml










10.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/10






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9221 — CMA CGM/CEVA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 9/11)

1.   
On 21 December 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


CMA CGM S.A. (‘CMA CGM’, France),










—


CEVA Logistics AG (‘CEVA’, Switzerland).




CMA CGM acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of CEVA.
The concentration is accomplished by way of public bid announced on 26 November 2018.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for CMA CGM: sea transportation, including container liner shipping, port terminal services and, to a lesser extent, freight forwarding services;
—   for CEVA: (i) freight forwarding services, including air and ocean freight, ground transportation, customs brokerage and other value-added services and (ii) contract logistics, including warehousing services, transportation, inbound logistics and manufacturing support.


3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9221 — CMA CGM/CEVA
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).