do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-16/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie (Poland) lodged on 2 January 2019 — VL v Szpital Kliniczny im. dra J. Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie
Date: 2019-01-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: disabled person, discrimination based on disability, employer, equal treatment, incapacity for work, labour law, worker with disabilities








C_2019164EN.01001001.xml










13.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/10






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie (Poland) lodged on 2 January 2019 — VL v Szpital Kliniczny im. dra J. Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie
(Case C-16/19)
(2019/C 164/11)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Krakowie

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: VL

Respondent: Szpital Kliniczny im. dra J. Babińskiego Samodzielny Publiczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej w Krakowie

Question referred

Should Article 2 of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (1) be interpreted as meaning that the differing treatment of individual members of a group distinguished by a protected characteristic (disability) amounts to a breach of the principle of equal treatment if the employer treats individual members of that group differently on the basis of an apparently neutral criterion, and that criterion cannot be objectively justified by a legitimate aim, and the measures taken in order to achieve that aim are not appropriate and necessary?


(1)  OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.
Case T-4/19: Action brought on 2 January 2019 — Hankintatukku Arno Latvus v EUIPO — Triaz Group (VIVANIA)
Date: 2019-01-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cosmetic product, dietary product, pharmaceutical product, polishing and scouring preparations, registered trade mark, trade-mark law, veterinary medicinal product








C_2019072EN.01004101.xml










25.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/41






Action brought on 2 January 2019 — Hankintatukku Arno Latvus v EUIPO — Triaz Group (VIVANIA)
(Case T-4/19)
(2019/C 72/52)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Hankintatukku Arno Latvus Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: A. Fottner and M. Müller, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Triaz Group GmbH (Freiburg, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark VIVANIA — European Union trade mark No 11 637 121

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 October 2018 in Case R 767/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject the request for declaration of invalidity of European Union trade mark No 11 637 121 ‘VIVANIA’;










—


order EUIPO and the other party before the Board of Appeal to bear the applicant’s costs in the present procedure.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.