do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-832/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hovioikeus (Finland) lodged on 21 December 2018 — A and Others v Finnair Oyj
Date: 2018-12-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, traveller, vehicle parts








C_2019093EN.01003301.xml










11.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 93/33






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hovioikeus (Finland) lodged on 21 December 2018 — A and Others v Finnair Oyj
(Case C-832/18)
(2019/C 93/43)
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Helsingin hovioikeus

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: A and Others

Defendant: Finnair Oyj

Questions referred







1.


Is Regulation No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a passenger has the right to further compensation in accordance with Article 7(1) if he has received compensation for a cancelled flight, the operating air carrier of the re-routed flight is the same as that of the cancelled flight, and the re-routed flight after the cancelled flight is also delayed beyond the scheduled time of arrival to such an extent that it entitles the passenger to compensation?










2.


If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative, can the operating air carrier rely on extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 5(3) if, following a technical follow-up by the aircraft manufacturer in relation to aircraft already in use, the part dealt with in that document is in fact treated as a so-called ‘on condition’ part, that is to say as a part that is used until it becomes defective, and the operating air carrier has prepared to replace the part in question by permanently stocking a spare part?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Case T-761/18: Action brought on 21 December 2018 — La Caixa v EUIPO — Imagic Vision (imagin bank)
Date: 2018-12-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, communications systems, data processing, electronic money, financial services, insurance, registered trade mark, software, teaching materials, trade-mark law








C_2019072EN.01003901.xml










25.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/39






Action brought on 21 December 2018 — La Caixa v EUIPO — Imagic Vision (imagin bank)
(Case T-761/18)
(2019/C 72/50)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Fundación bancaria caixa d’estalvis i pensions de Barcelona La Caixa (Palma de Mallorca, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, P. Román Maestre, D. Liern Cendrero, D. Gabarre Armengol and J. Rodriguez Fuensalida, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Imagic Vision, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark imagin bank — Application for registration No 14 861 108

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 October 2018 in Case R 1954/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Rule that the present action against the contested decision is admissible;










—


Find that Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council was erroneously applied in that decision;










—


Grant protection in respect of all goods and services sought in the application for registration of European Union figurative trade mark No 14 861 108, ‘imagin bank’, in Classes 9, 36 and 38;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs associated with these proceedings, including the representation costs incurred by the applicant.





Plea in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9122 — TCCC/Costa) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-12-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: beverage industry, catering industry, coffee, economic concentration, merger control, non-alcoholic beverage, wholesale selling








C_2019066EN.01000101.xml










19.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 66/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9122 — TCCC/Costa)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 66/01)
On 21 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9122. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2018-12-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Barents Sea, EU waters, France, Norwegian Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2018460EN.01003901.xml










21.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 460/39






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2018/C 460/21)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


26.11.2018




Duration


26.11.2018-31.12.2018




Member State


France




Stock or Group of stocks


LIN/1/2.




Species


Ling (molva molva)




Zone


Union and international waters of 1 and 2




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


48/TQ120






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) (Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-12-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, European Commission
Subjects: aerospace industry, chemical product, chromium, health control, health risk, launch vehicle, market approval, marketing standard, metal coating, oxide








C_2018460EN.01002901.xml










21.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 460/29






Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1)
)

(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 460/14)

Decisions granting an authorisation













Reference of the decision (2)



Date of decision


Substance name


Holder of the authorisation


Authorisation number


Authorised use


Date of expiry of review period


Reasons for the decision




C(2018) 8494


14 December 2018


Chromium trioxide
EC No 215-607-8
CAS No 1333-82-0


Euro Cryospace France, 51-61 Route de Verneuil, 78133 Les Mureaux Cedex, France


REACH/18/18/0


Use of chromium trioxide for the surface preparation of aluminium alloy cryogenic tanks used in the Ariane 5 launcher


21 September 2024


In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socioeconomic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment arising from the uses of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies for the applicant before the sunset date.






(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/chemicals/reach/about/index_en.htm
Case C-810/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Trnave (Slovakia) lodged on 21 December 2018 — DHL Logistics (Slovakia), spol. s r.o. v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky
Date: 2018-12-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, customs regulations, recording equipment, specification of tariff heading








C_2019082EN.01001601.xml










4.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 82/16






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský súd v Trnave (Slovakia) lodged on 21 December 2018 — DHL Logistics (Slovakia), spol. s r.o. v Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky
(Case C-810/18)
(2019/C 82/17)
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Krajský súd v Trnave

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: DHL Logistics (Slovakia), spol. s r.o.

Respondent: Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky

Question referred

Must the wording of Combined Nomenclature subheading 8525 80 91 set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1) of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff resulting from the Explanatory Notes published pursuant to that regulation in 2011 (2) (Commission Communication 2011/C 137/01) be interpreted as meaning that goods such as the digital video camera recorders at issue in the present case may also be classified under that subheading even though they are capable of capturing and recording video images only of a quality of less than 800 x 600 pixels, specifically, 720 x 576 pixels, given that their other function — the capturing and recording of still images — is limited to a still image quality of 1 600 x 1 200 pixels (1,92 megapixels)?


(1)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2011 C 137, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9187 — Autolaunch/Beijing Electric Vehicle Co/JVs) (Text with EEA relevance) 2021/C 82/05
Date: 2018-12-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electric vehicle, merger control, motor vehicle industry, provision of services, subsidiary, supplier, tool industry, vehicle parts








C_2021082EN.01000501.xml










11.3.2021   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 82/5






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9187 — Autolaunch/Beijing Electric Vehicle Co/JVs)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2021/C 82/05)
On 21 December 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9187. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2018-12-21
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, France, Norwegian Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2018460EN.01003802.xml










21.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 460/38






Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2018/C 460/20)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


26.11.2018




Duration


26.11.2018-31.12.2018




Member State


France




Stock or Group of stocks


POK/1N2AB.




Species


Saithe (Pollachius virens)




Zone


Norwegian waters of 1 and 2




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


49/TQ120






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.