do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-734/18 P: Appeal brought on 23 November 2018 by Sevenfriday AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2018 in Case T-448/17: Sevenfriday v EUIPO
Date: 2018-11-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, fancy leather goods and glove-making industry, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019155EN.01001702.xml










6.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/17






Appeal brought on 23 November 2018 by Sevenfriday AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2018 in Case T-448/17: Sevenfriday v EUIPO
(Case C-734/18 P)
(2019/C 155/23)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Sevenfriday AG (represented by: M. Mostardini, F. Mellucci, S. Pallavicini, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Seven SpA
By order of 19 March 2019 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
Case T-416/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2018 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese — Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-11-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cheese, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019044EN.01003401.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/34






Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2018 — Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino)
(Case T-416/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese - Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2019/C 44/43)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Papouis Dairies Ltd (Nicosia), (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2017 (Case R 2759/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi and Papouis Dairies.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 April 2017 (Case R 2759/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi and Papouis Dairies Ltd;










2.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi;










3.


Orders Papouis Dairies to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.
Case C-733/18 P: Appeal brought on 23 November 2018 by Sevenfriday AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2018 in Case T-449/17: Sevenfriday v EUIPO
Date: 2018-11-23
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, fancy leather goods and glove-making industry, leather, optical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019155EN.01001701.xml










6.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 155/17






Appeal brought on 23 November 2018 by Sevenfriday AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 27 September 2018 in Case T-449/17: Sevenfriday v EUIPO
(Case C-733/18 P)
(2019/C 155/22)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Sevenfriday AG (represented by: M. Mostardini, F. Mellucci, S. Pallavicini, avvocati)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Seven SpA
By order of 19 March 2019 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9152 — BC Partners/United Group) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-11-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, mass media, merger control, provision of services, telecommunications industry








C_2018423EN.01002401.xml










23.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 423/24






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9152 — BC Partners/United Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 423/10)

1.   
On 16 November 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


BC European Capital Management X Limited, ultimately advised by BC Partners LLP (United Kingdom),










—


United Group BV (The Netherlands).




BC Partners LLP acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of United Group BV.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for BC Partners LLP: private equity fund,
—   for United Group BV: provider of telecommunications and media services.


3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9152 — BC Partners/United Group
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case T-703/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2018 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (Papouis Halloumi) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Papouis Halloumi — Earlier United Kingdom certification word mark HALLOUMI — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-11-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cows’ milk cheese, goats’ milk cheese, registered trade mark, sheep's milk cheese, trade-mark law








C_2019044EN.01004201.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/42






Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2018 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (Papouis Halloumi)
(Case T-703/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Papouis Halloumi - Earlier United Kingdom certification word mark HALLOUMI - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2019/C 44/52)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Papouis Dairies Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 August 2017 (Case R 2924/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi and Papouis Dairies.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 3 August 2017 (Case R 2924/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Papouis Dairies Ltd;










2.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Cyprus;










3.


Orders Papouis Dairies to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 437, 18.12.2017.
Case T-417/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2018 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese — Earlier United Kingdom certification word mark HALLOUMI — Rejection of the opposition — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-11-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cheese, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019044EN.01003501.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/35






Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2018 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese)
(Case T-417/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark fino Cyprus Halloumi Cheese - Earlier United Kingdom certification word mark HALLOUMI - Rejection of the opposition - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2019/C 44/44)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Papouis Dairies Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 April 2017 (Case R 2650/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Papouis Dairies.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 April 2017 (Case R 2650/2014-4) concerning opposition proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Papouis Dairies Ltd;










2.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Cyprus;










3.


Orders Papouis Dairies to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.