do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1837 of 22 November 2018 on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 28th partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080
Date: 2018-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: common organisation of markets, intervention buying, invitation to tender, minimum price, purchase price, skimmed milk powder, tendering








L_2018298EN.01001001.xml










23.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 298/10








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1837
of 22 November 2018
         
on the minimum selling price for skimmed milk powder for the 28th partial invitation to tender within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1),


Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1240 of 18 May 2016 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to public intervention and aid for private storage (2), and in particular Article 32 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 (3) has opened the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure.












(2)


In the light of the tenders received for the 28th partial invitation to tender, a minimum selling price should be fixed.












(3)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
For the 28th partial invitation to tender for the selling of skimmed milk powder within the tendering procedure opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080, in respect of which the period during which tenders were to be submitted ended on 20 November 2018, the minimum selling price shall be 131,30 EUR/100 kg.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 November 2018.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA
            

Director-General


Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

(2)  
            OJ L 206, 30.7.2016, p. 71.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2080 of 25 November 2016 opening the sale of skimmed milk powder by a tendering procedure (OJ L 321, 29.11.2016, p. 45).
Case T-78/18: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — AB Mauri Italy v EUIPO — Lesaffre (FERMIN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the EU word mark FERMIN — Earlier international and Benelux word marks FERMIPAN — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001)
Date: 2018-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, bakery, bread-making, cereal flour, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2019044EN.01004701.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/47






Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — AB Mauri Italy v EUIPO — Lesaffre (FERMIN)
(Case T-78/18) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the EU word mark FERMIN - Earlier international and Benelux word marks FERMIPAN - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(2019/C 44/59)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: AB Mauri Italy SpA (Casteggio, Italy) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister, and G. Hussey, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Lesaffre et Cie (Paris, France)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2017 (Joined Cases R 2027/2016-4 and R 2254/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between AB Mauri Italy and Lesaffre et Cie.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2017 (Joined Cases R 2027/2016-4 and R 2254/2016–4) in so far as it rejected, for lack of similarity with ‘yeast’ in Class 30, the opposition to registration of the word mark FERMIN in respect of some of the goods in the same class, namely ‘mixes for bakery products; bakery mixtures (ready-to-use bread mixes); yeast- based preparations for pastries and pizza dough’;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by AB Mauri Italy SpA.






(1)  OJ C 112, 26.3.2018.
Case C-232/18: Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Almería — Spain) — Banco Popular Español S.A. v María Angeles Díaz Soria, Miguel Ángel Góngora Gómez, José Antonio Sánchez González, Dolores María del Águila Andújar
Date: 2018-11-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer price, consumer protection, unfair terms of contract








C_2019054EN.01001802.xml










11.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/18






Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Almería — Spain) — Banco Popular Español S.A. v María Angeles Díaz Soria, Miguel Ángel Góngora Gómez, José Antonio Sánchez González, Dolores María del Águila Andújar
(Case C-232/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/28)
Language of the case: Spanish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.
Case T-356/17: Order of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Word mark RoB — Declaration of invalidity — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rule 62(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 58(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Date: 2018-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, catering industry, clothing, cosmetic product, leather, medical device, registered trade mark, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2019044EN.01006101.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/61






Order of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB)
(Case T-356/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Word mark RoB - Declaration of invalidity - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Rule 62(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 58(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/625) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2019/C 44/79)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Daico International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Kassner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: American Franchise Marketing Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 (Case R 1407/2016-2), relating to cancellation proceedings between American Franchise Marketing and Daico International.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Daico International BV shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.
Case C-151/17: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products — Directive 2014/40/EU — Article 1(c) and Article 17 — Prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use — Validity)
Date: 2018-11-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, freedom of self-determination, health care, market approval, principle of proportionality, principle of subsidiarity, protection of privacy, quantitative restriction, tobacco, tobacco industry








C_2019025EN.01000601.xml










21.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/6






Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health
(Case C-151/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Directive 2014/40/EU - Article 1(c) and Article 17 - Prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use - Validity))
(2019/C 25/07)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Swedish Match AB

Defendant: Secretary of State for Health

Intervener: New Nicotine Alliance

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC.


(1)  OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.
Case C-728/18 P: Appeal brought on 22 November 2018 by EM Research Organization, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 25 September 2018 in Case T-180/17: EM Research Organization v EUIPO - Christoph Fischer e.a
Date: 2018-11-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, soil conditioning, trade-mark law








C_2019399EN.01001901.xml










25.11.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/19






Appeal brought on 22 November 2018 by EM Research Organization, Inc. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 25 September 2018 in Case T-180/17: EM Research Organization v EUIPO - Christoph Fischer e.a
(Case C-728/18 P)
(2019/C 399/22)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: EM Research Organization, Inc. (represented by: J. Liesegang, N. Lang, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Christoph Fischer GmbH, Ole Weinkath, Multikraft Productions- und Handels GmbH, Phytodor AG
By order of 25 September 2019 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal is dismissed as, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded and that EM Research Organization, Inc. shall bear its own costs.
Case T-31/17: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Portugal v Commission (EAGF — Expenditure excluded from financing — Specific measures in favour of the outermost regions — Article 12(c) of Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 — Technical assistance — Inspection measures — Procedural guarantees — Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2018-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAGF, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, eligibility criteria, peripheral region








C_2019044EN.01002801.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/28






Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Portugal v Commission
(Case T-31/17) (1)

((EAGF - Expenditure excluded from financing - Specific measures in favour of the outermost regions - Article 12(c) of Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 - Technical assistance - Inspection measures - Procedural guarantees - Legitimate expectations))
(2019/C 44/35)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, J. Saraiva de Almeida and A. Tavares de Almeida, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Rechena and A. Sauka, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2018 of 15 November 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2016 L 312, p. 26), in so far as it excludes from that financing in relation to the Portuguese Republic the amounts of EUR 460 202,73and of EUR 200 000 (Budget item 6701).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 104, 3.4.2017.
Case T-826/17: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — TeamBank v EUIPO — Fio Systems (FYYO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark FYYO — Earlier EU word mark FIO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2019044EN.01004501.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/45






Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — TeamBank v EUIPO — Fio Systems (FYYO)
(Case T-826/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark FYYO - Earlier EU word mark FIO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2019/C 44/56)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: TeamBank AG Nürnberg (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: D. Terheggen and H. Lindner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fio Systems AG (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: S. Hänsel, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2017 (Case R 2337/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Fio Systems and TeamBank Nürnberg.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1)


Dismisses the action;










2)


Orders TeamBank AG Nürnberg to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 52, 12.2.2018.