do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-405/11: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Axa Mediterranean v Commission (State aid — Provisions concerning corporate tax allowing undertakings which are tax resident in Spain to amortise the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in undertakings which are tax resident abroad — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Concept of State aid — Selectivity — Reference system — Derogation — Difference in treatment — Justification of the difference in treatment — Undertakings benefiting from the measure — Legitimate expectations)
Date: 2018-11-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, State aid, amortisation, corporation tax, equal treatment, establishment, foreign enterprise, goodwill, reimbursement of aid, shareholding








C_2019025EN.01003601.xml










21.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/36






Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Axa Mediterranean v Commission
(Case T-405/11) (1)

((State aid - Provisions concerning corporate tax allowing undertakings which are tax resident in Spain to amortise the goodwill resulting from the acquisition of shareholdings in undertakings which are tax resident abroad - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Concept of State aid - Selectivity - Reference system - Derogation - Difference in treatment - Justification of the difference in treatment - Undertakings benefiting from the measure - Legitimate expectations))
(2019/C 25/45)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Axa Mediterranean Holding, SA (Palma de Mallorca, Spain) (represented by: initially, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, and, subsequently, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro and R. Calvo Salinero, and, finally, J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, R. Calvo Salinero and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Article 1(1) and Article 4 of Commission Decision 2011/282/EU of 12 January 2011 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions No C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 135, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Axa Mediterranean Holding, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
Case T-680/18: Action brought on 15 November 2018 — SLL Service v EUIPO — Elfa International (LUMIN8)
Date: 2018-11-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, building industry, furniture industry, registered trade mark, trade event, trade-mark law








C_2019025EN.01005401.xml










21.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/54






Action brought on 15 November 2018 — SLL Service v EUIPO — Elfa International (LUMIN8)
(Case T-680/18)
(2019/C 25/70)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: SLL Service GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Schmitt, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Elfa International AB (Västervik, Sweden)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark LUMIN8 — International registration designating the European Union No 1 276 543

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 August 2018 in Case R 2752/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case C-717/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 15 November 2018 — Procureur General, other party: X
Date: 2018-11-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, criminal law, imprisonment, retroactivity of a law








C_2019035EN.01001201.xml










28.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/12






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Beroep te Gent (Belgium) lodged on 15 November 2018 — Procureur General, other party: X
(Case C-717/18)
(2019/C 35/15)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hof van Beroep te Gent

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Procureur-General

Other party: X

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 2(2) EAWFD, (1) as transposed into Belgian law by the Wet EAB, permit, for the purposes of the executing Member State’s assessment of the minimum maximum three year threshold imposed therein, recourse to be had to the criminal legislation that was applicable in the issuing Member State at the point in time at which the European arrest warrant was issued?










2.


Does Article 2(2) EAWFD, as transposed into Belgian law by the Wet EAB, permit, for the purposes of the executing Member State’s assessment of the minimum maximum three year threshold imposed therein, recourse to be had to criminal legislation, applicable at the point in time of the issue of the European arrest warrant, allowing for a more severe penalty, as compared to the criminal legislation that was applicable in the issuing Member State at the point in time the offences were committed?






(1)  2002/584/JHA: Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States — Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).
Case C-715/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 November 2018 — Segler-Vereinigung Cuxhaven e.V. v Finanzamt Cuxhaven
Date: 2018-11-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, camping, camping vehicle, harbour installation, hiring, parking area, tax relief








C_2019082EN.01000901.xml










4.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 82/9






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 November 2018 — Segler-Vereinigung Cuxhaven e.V. v Finanzamt Cuxhaven
(Case C-715/18)
(2019/C 82/08)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Segler-Vereinigung Cuxhaven e.V.

Defendant: Finanzamt Cuxhaven

Question referred

Does the tax rate reduction for the letting of places on camping or caravan sites under Article 98(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) (‘the VAT Directive’), in conjunction with Annex III, No 12, to that directive, also cover the letting of boat moorings?


(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.
Case T-487/14: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — CHEMK and KF v Commission (Dumping — Imports of ferro-silicon originating in Russia — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Expiry review — Determination of the export price — Single economic entity — Reflection of the anti-dumping duty in resale prices in the European Union — Application of a methodology different from that used in an earlier investigation — Continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury — Article 2(9), Article 3 and Article 11(9) and (10) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9), Article 3 and Article 11(9) and (10) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036))
Date: 2018-11-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: China, Russia, anti-dumping duty, customs drawback, dumping, export price, ferro-alloy, import (EU), originating product, semi-metal








C_2019025EN.01003702.xml










21.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/37






Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — CHEMK and KF v Commission
(Case T-487/14) (1)

((Dumping - Imports of ferro-silicon originating in Russia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Expiry review - Determination of the export price - Single economic entity - Reflection of the anti-dumping duty in resale prices in the European Union - Application of a methodology different from that used in an earlier investigation - Continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury - Article 2(9), Article 3 and Article 11(9) and (10) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9), Article 3 and Article 11(9) and (10) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036)))
(2019/C 25/47)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) (Chelyabinsk, Russia) and Kuzneckie Ferrosplavy OAO (KF) (Novokuznetsk, Russia) (represented by: B. Evtimov and M. Krestiyanova, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. França, J.-F. Brakeland, A. Stobiecka-Kuik and A. Demeneix, Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Euroalliages (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: O. Prost and M.-S. Dibling, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 360/2014 of 9 April 2014 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ferro-silicon originating in the People’s Republic of China and Russia, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (OJ 2014 L 107, p. 13), in so far as it concerns the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Chelyabinsk electrometallurgical integrated plant OAO (CHEMK) and Kuzneckie Ferrosplavy OAO (KF) to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders Euroalliages to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.