do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-544/13 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Dyson v Commission (Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Commission delegated regulation supplementing the directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Essential element of an enabling act)
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: consumer information, energy consumption, energy efficiency, equal treatment, household electrical appliance, labelling, marketing standard








C_2019004EN.01002001.xml










7.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/20






Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Dyson v Commission
(Case T-544/13 RENV) (1)

(Directive 2010/30/EU - Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products - Commission delegated regulation supplementing the directive - Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners - Essential element of an enabling act)
(2019/C 4/27)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dyson Ltd (Malmesbury, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Carlin, Barrister, E. Batchelor and M. Healy, Solicitors, and A. Patsa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, K. Herrmann and K. Talabér-Ritz, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 of 3 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of vacuum cleaners (OJ 2013 L 192, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 of 3 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of vacuum cleaners;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings on appeal before the Court of Justice.






(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2018402EN.01000401.xml










8.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/4






Euro exchange rates (1)

7 November 2018
(2018/C 402/04)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1487 




JPY


Japanese yen


130,02 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4598 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87403 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3313 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1444 




ISK


Iceland króna


138,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5328 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,880 




HUF


Hungarian forint


321,76 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2940 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6621 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,1357 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5750 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5019 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9935 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6954 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5729 




KRW


South Korean won


1 286,25 




ZAR


South African rand


16,0216 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9426 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4338 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 748,05 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7734 




PHP


Philippine peso


60,584 




RUB


Russian rouble


75,7709 




THB


Thai baht


37,660 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,3061 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,6326 




INR


Indian rupee


83,2800 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-827/16: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — QB v ECB (Civil service — ECB staff — Appraisal exercise — Staff report [2015] — Possibility of being accompanied by a union representative during the appraisal interview — Infringement of the guidelines on objectivity and impartiality on the part of the assessor — Remuneration — Decision refusing the benefit of a salary progression — Admissibility of evidence — Email exchanged between a member of staff and that person’s ‘coach’ using a work email account — Liability)
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, indemnification, pay scale, right to justice, rights of the defence, staff assessment








C_2019016EN.01003902.xml










14.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/39






Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — QB v ECB
(Case T-827/16) (1)

((Civil service - ECB staff - Appraisal exercise - Staff report [2015] - Possibility of being accompanied by a union representative during the appraisal interview - Infringement of the guidelines on objectivity and impartiality on the part of the assessor - Remuneration - Decision refusing the benefit of a salary progression - Admissibility of evidence - Email exchanged between a member of staff and that person’s ‘coach’ using a work email account - Liability))
(2019/C 16/47)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: QB (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. von Lindeiner and B. Ehlers, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 36.2 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank annexed to the EU Treaty and the FEU Treaty, seeking (i) annulment of the applicant’s staff report for 2015 and the ECB decision of 15 December 2015 refusing the applicant the benefit of a salary progression and, in so far as is necessary, annulment of the ECB decisions of 2 May and 15 September 2016 rejecting the applicant’s administrative appeal and claim respectively; and (ii) damages in respect of the non-pecuniary harm which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls QB’s staff report for 2015 and the European Central Bank (ECB) decision of 15 December 2015 refusing QB the benefit of a salary progression;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the ECB to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by QB.






(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.8941 — EQT/Widex/JV) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, facilities for people with disabilities, merger control








C_2018402EN.01000101.xml










8.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/1






Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.8941 — EQT/Widex/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 402/01)
Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004
On 4 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between EQT and Widex Holding A/S. On 30 October 2018, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.
Case T-718/16: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Mad Dogg Athletics v EUIPO — Aerospinning Master Franchising (SPINNING) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark SPINNING — Partial revocation — Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, sports facilities, trade-mark law








C_2019016EN.01003801.xml










14.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/38






Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Mad Dogg Athletics v EUIPO — Aerospinning Master Franchising (SPINNING)
(Case T-718/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark SPINNING - Partial revocation - Article 51(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2019/C 16/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc. (Los Angeles, California, United States) (represented by: J. Steinberg, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Aerospinning Master Franchising, s.r.o., formerly Aerospinning Master Franchising, Ltd., s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: K. Labalestra, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 July 2016 (Case R 2375/2014-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Aerospinning Master Franchising and Mad Dogg Athletics.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 21 July 2016 (Case R 2375/2014-5) in so far as it concerns the goods in Class 28 and the services in Class 41 of the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended;










2.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mad Dogg Athletics, Inc.;










3.


Orders Aerospinning Master Franchising, s.r.o. to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9093 — DP World Investments/Unifeeder) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, logistics, maritime transport, merger control, provision of services








C_2018402EN.01000701.xml










8.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/7






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.9093 — DP World Investments/Unifeeder)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 402/07)

1.   
On 26 October 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


DP World Investments B.V. (The Netherlands), belonging to the DP World group (‘DP World’, United Arab Emirates),










—


Unifeeder A/S (‘Unifeeder’, Denmark).




DP World acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of Unifeeder.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for DP World: worldwide operation of marine terminals and provision of cargo handling and logistics services,
—   for Unifeeder: provision of maritime transportation services for containerised goods including feeder services and short sea services, primarily in Northern Europe and the Mediterranean.


3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.9093 — DP World Investments/Unifeeder
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case C-557/18: Order of the President of the Court of 8 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Eurowings GmbH v JJ, KI
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, indemnification, travel agency








C_2019054EN.01001903.xml










11.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/19






Order of the President of the Court of 8 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Eurowings GmbH v JJ, KI
(Case C-557/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/33)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.
Case C-227/18: Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 8 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — VE v WD
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer information, credit policy, financial risk, loan, unfair terms of contract








C_2019054EN.01001801.xml










11.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/18






Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 8 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budai Központi Kerületi Bíróság — Hungary) — VE v WD
(Case C-227/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/27)
Language of the case: Hungarian
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 231, 2.7.2018.
Case T-34/16: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Lithuania v Commission (EAGF – Expenditure excluded from financing – Specific support for the bovine and ovine meat sectors – On-site inspections – Physical verification of the animals – Quality of the inspections – Inspection report – Flat-rate correction – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – One-off correction)
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, beef, eligibility criteria, principle of proportionality, veterinary inspection








C_2019004EN.01002101.xml










7.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/21






Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Lithuania v Commission
(Case T-34/16) (1)

(EAGF - Expenditure excluded from financing - Specific support for the bovine and ovine meat sectors - On-site inspections - Physical verification of the animals - Quality of the inspections - Inspection report - Flat-rate correction - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - One-off correction)
(2019/C 4/29)
Language of the case: Lithuanian

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: initially, D. Kriaučiūnas, T. Orlickas and R. Krasuckaitė, and subsequently T. Orlickas and R. Krasuckaitė, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sauka and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2098 of 13 November 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2015 L 303, p. 35).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Republic of Lithuania to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.
Case T-550/17: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Troszczynski v Parliament (Law governing the institutions – Member of the European Parliament – Privileges and immunities – Decision to lift parliamentary immunity – Activity unconnected to the functions of a Member – Procedure for lifting immunity – Non-contractual liability – Damage – Causal link)
Date: 2018-11-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, damages, equal treatment, parliamentary immunity, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2019004EN.01002801.xml










7.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/28






Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Troszczynski v Parliament
(Case T-550/17) (1)

(Law governing the institutions - Member of the European Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Decision to lift parliamentary immunity - Activity unconnected to the functions of a Member - Procedure for lifting immunity - Non-contractual liability - Damage - Causal link)
(2019/C 4/38)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Mylène Troszczynski (Noyon, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: initially, M. Dean and S. Alonso de León, and subsequently S. Alonso de León, N. Görlitz and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of 14 June 2017 by which the Parliament lifted the applicant’s immunity and, second, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mylène Troszczynski to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 357, 23.10.2017.