do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela apply
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Venezuela, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data








C_2018401EN.01000301.xml










7.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 401/3






Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Venezuela apply
(2018/C 401/04)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2017/2063 (2), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1653 (3).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of RELEX (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is RELEX.1.C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




RELEX.1.C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/2063, as implemented by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1653.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the statement of reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (4).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 295, 14.11.2017, p. 21.

(3)  OJ L 276, 7.11.2018, p. 1.

(4)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Case C-699/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureș (Romania) lodged on 7 November 2018 — BRD Groupe Societé Générale SA v KC
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: consumer credit, consumer protection, principle of legal certainty, termination of a contract, unfair terms of contract








C_2019054EN.01000501.xml










11.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureș (Romania) lodged on 7 November 2018 — BRD Groupe Societé Générale SA v KC
(Case C-699/18)
(2019/C 54/07)
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Specializat Mureș

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: BRD Groupe Societé Générale SA

Defendant: KC

Questions referred







1.


Do the provisions of Council Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts, (1) in particular the 12th, 21st and 23rd recitals and Articles 2(b), 6(1), 7(2) and 8 thereof, permit, in accordance with the principle of procedural autonomy and the principle of equivalence and effectiveness, a set of means of legal recourse that consists in an ordinary legal action, not subject to any limitation period, to establish the unfairness of certain terms in a consumer contract and an ordinary legal action of a personal and pecuniary nature that is subject to a limitation period, which is used in pursuit of the directive’s aim of eliminating the effects of all obligations arising and performed under clauses which are found to be unfair to consumers?










2.


In the event that the first question is answered in the affirmative, do those same provisions preclude an interpretation, derived from application of the principle of the certainty of civil-law legal relationships, according to which the objective point in time by which the consumer must have known or should have known of the existence of the unfair terms is the time at which the loan agreement with that consumer came to an end?






(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).
Case C-466/18: Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Linz — Austria) — DS v Porsche Inter Auto GmbH & Co KG
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: clean technology, combustion gases, consumer goods, engine, environmental standard, motor vehicle pollution, reduction of gas emissions, vehicle parts








C_2019054EN.01001901.xml










11.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/19






Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Linz — Austria) — DS v Porsche Inter Auto GmbH & Co KG
(Case C-466/18) (1)

(2019/C 54/31)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 408, 12.11.2018.
Case C-694/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 7 November 2018 — Ente Público Radio Televisión Madrid v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (AEAT)
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, economic activity, provision of services, public institution, tax relief, taxpayer, television








C_2019072EN.01000302.xml










25.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/3






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 7 November 2018 — Ente Público Radio Televisión Madrid v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (AEAT)
(Case C-694/18)
(2019/C 72/04)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ente Público Radio Televisión Madrid

Defendant: Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (AEAT)

Questions referred







1.


Is it possible to treat entities like those described, together with the bodies governed by public law which create them, as single taxable persons for VAT purposes, as defined by Article 11 of Directive 2006/112/EC? (1)











2.


If the answer to the previous question is affirmative, is it necessary to consider that the funding received by such entities from the bodies governed by public law which create them cannot under any circumstances be classified as consideration for the provision of services subject to VAT?










3.


As regards the deduction of input VAT payments by those entities, must it be the single taxable person which, as such, calculates the deductible amount by applying Article 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the basis of the activities which it carries out?










4.


In particular, and as far as public service television activities are concerned, assuming that those entities are capable of having a dual nature and also assuming that, together with the bodies governed by public law which are their majority shareholders, they are treated as single taxable persons, must only the portion of input VAT which can be considered to relate to their economic activity be treated as deductible?






(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).
Case C-171/17: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 November 2018 — Commission v Hungary (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2006/123/EC — Articles 15 to 17 — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Article 56 TFEU — Freedom to provide services — National mobile payment system — Monopoly)
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: charges for use of infrastructure, electronic money, equal treatment, freedom to provide services, motorway, parking area, principle of proportionality, provision of services, right of establishment, telecommunications








C_2019016EN.01000901.xml










14.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/9






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 November 2018 — Commission v Hungary
(Case C-171/17) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2006/123/EC - Articles 15 to 17 - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Article 56 TFEU - Freedom to provide services - National mobile payment system - Monopoly))
(2019/C 16/10)
Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by instituting and maintaining in force the national mobile payment system governed by a nemzeti mobil fizetési rendszerről szóló 2011. évi CC. törvény (Law CC of 2011 on the national mobile payment system) and by 356/2012. (XII. 13.) Korm. rendelet a nemzeti mobil fizetési rendszerről szóló törvény végrehajtásáról (Governmental Decree No 356/2012 implementing the mobile payment system law), Hungary has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 15(2)(d) of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market and Article 56 TFEU;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the European Commission and Hungary to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9050 — Hammerson/M&amp;G/Highcross) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial services, investment company, merger control, property development, real estate business, shopping centre, subsidiary








C_2018414EN.01000201.xml










15.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 414/2






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9050 — Hammerson/M&G/Highcross)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 414/03)
On 7 November 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9050. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Electronic identification schemes notified pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, data processing, electronic document, electronic government, electronic signature, identity document, residence permit, service, single market








C_2018401EN.01000701.xml










7.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 401/7






Electronic identification schemes notified pursuant to Article 9(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (1)

(2018/C 401/08)










Title of the scheme


eID means under the notified scheme


Notifying Member State


Level of assurance


Authority responsible for the scheme


Date of publication in the Official Journal




German eID based on Extended Access Control


National Identity Card
Electronic Residence Permit


Germany


High







Federal Ministry of the Interior




Alt-Moabit 140




10557 Berlin




GERMANY




DGI2@bmi.bund.de




+49 30186810






26.9.2017




SPID – Public System of Digital Identity


SPID eID means provided by:






—


Aruba PEC S.p.A.










—


Namirial S.p.A.










—


InfoCert S.p.A.










—


In.Te.S.A. S.p.A.










—


Poste Italiane S.p.A










—


Register.it S.p.A.










—


Sielte S.p.A.










—


Telecom Italia










—


Trust Technologies S.r.l.






Italy


High
Substantial Low







AgID - Agency for Digital




Italy




Viale Liszt, 21




00144 Roma




ITALY




eidas-spid@agid.gov.it




+39 0685264407






10.9.2018




National Identification and Authentication System
(NIAS)


Personal Identity Card (eOI)


Croatia


High







Ministry of Public Administration, Republic of Croatia




Maksimirska 63




10000 Zagreb




CROATIA




e-gradjani@uprava.hr






7.11.2018




Estonian eID scheme: ID card
Estonian eID scheme: RP card
Estonian eID scheme: Digi-ID
Estonian eID scheme: e-Residency Digi-ID
Estonian eID scheme: Mobiil-ID
Estonian eID scheme: diplomatic identity card








—


ID card










—


RP card










—


Digi-ID










—


e-Residency Digi-ID










—


Mobiil-ID










—


Diplomatic identity card






Estonia


High







Police and Border Guard Board




Pärnu mnt 139




15060 Tallinn




ESTONIA




eid@politsei.ee




+372 6123000






7.11.2018




Documento Nacional de Identidad electrónico (DNIe)


Spanish ID card (DNIe)


Spain


High







Ministry of Interior - Kingdom of Spain




C/ Julián González




Segador, s/n




28043 MADRID




SPAIN




divisiondedocumentacion@policia.es






7.11.2018




Luxembourg national identity card (eID card)


Luxembourg eID card


Luxembourg


High







Ministry for Home Affairs




BP 10




L-2010 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




minint@mi.etat.lu




secretariat@ctie.etat.lu




+352 24784600






7.11.2018






(1)  OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 73.
Case C-700/18 P: Appeal brought on 7 November 2018 by Hungary Restaurant Company Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. (Hungary Restaurant Company Kft.) and Evolution Gaming Advisory Kft. against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) made on 12 October 2018 in Case T-416/18, Hungary Restaurant Company Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. (Hungary Restaurant Company Kft.) and Evolution Gaming Advisory Kft. v European Commission
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: catering industry, gaming, legal expenses, limitation of legal proceedings








C_2019164EN.01000201.xml










13.5.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 164/2






Appeal brought on 7 November 2018 by Hungary Restaurant Company Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. (Hungary Restaurant Company Kft.) and Evolution Gaming Advisory Kft. against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) made on 12 October 2018 in Case T-416/18, Hungary Restaurant Company Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. (Hungary Restaurant Company Kft.) and Evolution Gaming Advisory Kft. v European Commission
(Case C-700/18 P)
(2019/C 164/02)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellants: Hungary Restaurant Company Kereskedelmi és Szolgáltató Kft. (Hungary Restaurant Company Kft.), Evolution Gaming Advisory Kft. (represented by: P. Ruth, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
By order of 14 March 2019, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellants to bear their own costs.
Case C-730/17: Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Edward Reich, Debora Lieber, Ella Reich, Ezra Bernard Reich, Zoe Reich v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, rail transport








C_2019054EN.01001702.xml










11.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 54/17






Order of the President of the Court of 7 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles — Belgium) — Edward Reich, Debora Lieber, Ella Reich, Ezra Bernard Reich, Zoe Reich v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV
(Case C-730/17) (1)

(2019/C 54/24)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.
Case C-484/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — K v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/86/EC — Right to family reunification — Article 15 — Refusal to grant an autonomous residence permit — National legislation providing for a requirement to pass a civic integration examination)
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: family, family migration, foreign national, integration of migrants, residence permit








C_2019016EN.01002201.xml










14.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/22






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — K v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
(Case C-484/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/86/EC - Right to family reunification - Article 15 - Refusal to grant an autonomous residence permit - National legislation providing for a requirement to pass a civic integration examination))
(2019/C 16/26)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: K

Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(1) and (4) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification does not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which permits an application for an autonomous residence permit, lodged by a third country national who has resided over five years in a Member State by virtue of family reunification, to be rejected on the ground that he has not shown that he has passed a civic integration test on the language and society of that Member State provided that the detailed rules for the requirement to pass that examination do not go beyond what is necessary to attain the objective of facilitating the integration of those third country nationals, which is for the referring court to ascertain.


(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.
Case C-696/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 7 November 2018 — Radiotelevisión del Principado de Asturias SAU v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (AEAT)
Date: 2018-11-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, economic activity, provision of services, public institution, tax relief, taxpayer, television








C_2019072EN.01000501.xml










25.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/5






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 7 November 2018 — Radiotelevisión del Principado de Asturias SAU v Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (AEAT)
(Case C-696/18)
(2019/C 72/06)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Económico Administrativo Central de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Radiotelevisión del Principado de Asturias SAU

Defendant: Agencia Estatal de la Administración Tributaria (AEAT)

Questions referred







1.


Is it possible to treat entities like those described, together with the bodies governed by public law which create them, as single taxable persons for VAT purposes, as defined by Article 11 of Directive 2006/112/EC? (1)











2.


If the answer to the previous question is affirmative, is it necessary to consider that the funding received by such entities from the bodies governed by public law which create them cannot under any circumstances be classified as consideration for the provision of services subject to VAT?










3.


As regards the deduction of input VAT payments by those entities, must it be the single taxable person which, as such, calculates the deductible amount by applying Article 168 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the basis of the activities which it carries out?










4.


In particular, and as far as public service television activities are concerned, assuming that those entities are capable of having a dual nature and also assuming that, together with the bodies governed by public law which are their majority shareholders, they are treated as single taxable persons, must only the portion of input VAT which can be considered to relate to their economic activity be treated as deductible?






(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).