do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1604 of 25 October 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Guinea, economic sanctions, international sanctions, military personnel, natural person








L_2018268EN.01001601.xml










26.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 268/16








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1604
of 25 October 2018
         
implementing Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea (1), and in particular Article 15a(4) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 22 December 2009, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009.












(2)


The information concerning the military rank of two of the persons listed in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 should be updated.












(3)


Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 25 October 2018.


For the Council


The President

J. BOGNER-STRAUSS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 346, 23.12.2009, p. 26.




ANNEX



‘ANNEX II

LIST OF NATURAL AND LEGAL PERSONS, ENTITIES OR BODIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 6(3)









 


Name
(and possible aliases)


Identifying information


Reasons




1.


Captain Moussa Dadis CAMARA


d.o.b.: 1.1.64 or 29.12.68
Pass: R0001318


Person identified by the International Commission of Inquiry as responsible for the 28 September 2009 events in Guinea




2.


Colonel Moussa Tiégboro CAMARA


d.o.b.: 1.1.68
Pass: 7190


Person identified by the International Commission of Inquiry as responsible for the 28 September 2009 events in Guinea




3.


Colonel Dr. Abdoulaye Chérif DIABY


d.o.b.: 26.2.57
Pass: 13683


Person identified by the International Commission of Inquiry as responsible for the 28 September 2009 events in Guinea




4.


Lieutenant Aboubacar Chérif (alias Toumba) DIAKITÉ


 


Person identified by the International Commission of Inquiry as responsible for the 28 September 2009 events in Guinea




5.


Colonel Jean-Claude PIVI (alias Coplan)


d.o.b.: 1.1.60


Person identified by the International Commission of Inquiry as responsible for the 28 September 2009 events in Guinea






            ’
Case T-628/11: Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Biogas Nord v Commission (State aid — German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market — Annulment of the contested measure by the Court — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, company in difficulties, control of State aid, corporation tax, economic reconstruction, financial loss, tax relief








C_2019044EN.01005401.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/54






Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Biogas Nord v Commission
(Case T-628/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))
(2019/C 44/69)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Biogas Nord AG (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: C. Birkemeyer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on the action;










2.


The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Biogas Nord AG;










3.


The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.
Case C-451/17: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo — Bulgaria) — ‘Walltopia’ AD v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite — Veliko Tarnovo (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Article 12(1) – Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 – Article 14(1) – Posted workers – Legislation applicable – A1 certificate – Whether the employee is subject to the legislation of the Member State in which his employer is established – Conditions)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: establishment, posted worker, private international law, residence, social security








C_2019004EN.01000602.xml










7.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/6






Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo — Bulgaria) — ‘Walltopia’ AD v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite — Veliko Tarnovo
(Case C-451/17) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 12(1) - Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 - Article 14(1) - Posted workers - Legislation applicable - A1 certificate - Whether the employee is subject to the legislation of the Member State in which his employer is established - Conditions)
(2019/C 4/08)
Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant:‘Walltopia’ AD

Defendant: Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite — Veliko Tarnovo

Operative part of the judgment

Article 14(1) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems, read together with Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 465/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012, must be interpreted as meaning that an employee recruited with a view to being posted to another Member State must be regarded as having been ‘just before the start of his employment … already subject to the legislation of the Member State in which his employer is established’, within the meaning of Article 14(1) of Regulation No 987/2009, even if that employee was not an insured person under the legislation of that Member State immediately before the start of his employment, if, at that time, that employee had his residence in that Member State, which is for the referring court to ascertain.


(1)  OJ C 330, 2.10.2017.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2018385EN.01000301.xml










25.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 385/3






Euro exchange rates (1)

24 October 2018
(2018/C 385/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1389 




JPY


Japanese yen


128,37 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4604 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88233 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3590 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1373 




ISK


Iceland króna


137,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,4868 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,833 




HUF


Hungarian forint


323,22 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3053 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6590 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,4991 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6067 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4900 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9308 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7408 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5724 




KRW


South Korean won


1 291,15 




ZAR


South African rand


16,3455 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9090 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4273 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 307,86 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7452 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,207 




RUB


Russian rouble


74,3690 




THB


Thai baht


37,481 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2198 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,0293 




INR


Indian rupee


83,3255 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9117 — Saudi Aramco/Arlanxeo) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, merger control, oil industry, petroleum product








C_2018403EN.01000101.xml










9.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 403/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9117 — Saudi Aramco/Arlanxeo)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 403/01)
On 25 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9117. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-590/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Antonakopoulos v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Civil service — Officials — Suspension of an official from duties without withholding remuneration — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Damage to reputation — No urgency)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, Secretary General of an Institution, disciplinary proceedings, dismissal








C_2019044EN.01007401.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/74






Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Antonakopoulos v Parliament
(Case T-590/18 R)
((Application for interim measures - Civil service - Officials - Suspension of an official from duties without withholding remuneration - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Damage to reputation - No urgency))
(2019/C 44/98)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Leonidas Antonakopoulos (Athens, Greece) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Steele and V. Montebello-Demogeot, Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of the decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 25 September 2018 suspending the applicant from duties for an indefinite duration without withholding remuneration.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9115 — BC Partners/VetPartners) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, veterinary medicine








C_2018398EN.01000401.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 398/4






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9115 — BC Partners/VetPartners)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 398/07)
On 25 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9115. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-591/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — ZD v Parliament (Application for interim measures — Civil service — Officials — Suspension of an official from duties without withholding remuneration — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Damage to reputation — No urgency)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, Secretary General of an Institution, disciplinary proceedings, dismissal








C_2019044EN.01007501.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/75






Order of the President of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — ZD v Parliament
(Case T-591/18 R)
((Application for interim measures - Civil service - Officials - Suspension of an official from duties without withholding remuneration - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Damage to reputation - No urgency))
(2019/C 44/99)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZD (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: J. Steele and V. Montebello-Demogeot, Agents)

Re:

Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU for suspension of operation of the decision of the Secretary General of the Parliament of 25 September 2018 suspending the applicant from duties for a fixed period without withholding remuneration.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Case T-129/17 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — DI v EASO (Civil service – EASO staff – Members of the contract staff – Fixed-term contract – Probationary period – Decision to dismiss at the end of the probationary period – Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint – Liability)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, contract staff, damages, dismissal, probationary period, temporary employment








C_2019004EN.01002602.xml










7.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 4/26






Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — DI v EASO
(Case T-129/17 RENV)
(Civil service - EASO staff - Members of the contract staff - Fixed-term contract - Probationary period - Decision to dismiss at the end of the probationary period - Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint - Liability)
(2019/C 4/36)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: DI (represented by: I. Vlaic and G. Iliescu, lawyers)

Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (represented by: W. Stevens, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for, first, annulment of the decision of the Executive Director of EASO of 28 February 2013 to dismiss the applicant at the end of his probationary period and, second, damages for the damage allegedly suffered by him and his family.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs, including those relating to Case F-113/13 and to Case T-730/15 P.
Case T-610/11: Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Wagon Automotive Nagold v Commission (State aid — German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market — Annulment of the contested measure by the Court — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, company in difficulties, control of State aid, corporation tax, economic reconstruction, financial loss, tax relief








C_2019044EN.01004901.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/49






Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — Wagon Automotive Nagold v Commission
(Case T-610/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))
(2019/C 44/62)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH (Nagold, Germany) (represented by: initially, T. Hackemann and H. Horstkotte, then, T. Hackemann and F. von Bredow, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on the action;










2.


The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by Wagon Automotive Nagold GmbH;










3.


The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
Case T-282/17: Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — UI v Council (Civil service — Official — Action for failure to act — No decision following the report on the probationary period — Article 34 of the Staff Regulations — Decision to dismiss — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, dismissal, probationary period, staff assessment








C_2019044EN.01005901.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/59






Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — UI v Council
(Case T-282/17) (1)

((Civil service - Official - Action for failure to act - No decision following the report on the probationary period - Article 34 of the Staff Regulations - Decision to dismiss - No need to adjudicate))
(2019/C 44/76)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: UI (represented by: J. Diaz Cordova, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: R. Meyer and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU and seeking a declaration that the Council unlawfully failed to adopt, within the period prescribed under the Staff Regulations, a decision regarding the establishment of the applicant as an official.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The parties shall bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.
Case T-613/11: Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — VMS Deutschland v Commission (State aid — German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) — Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market — Annulment of the contested measure by the Court — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2018-10-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, State aid, company in difficulties, control of State aid, corporation tax, economic reconstruction, financial loss, tax relief








C_2019044EN.01005002.xml










4.2.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 44/50






Order of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — VMS Deutschland v Commission
(Case T-613/11) (1)

((State aid - German tax legislation concerning the possibility of carrying losses forward to future tax years (Sanierungsklausel) - Decision declaring aid incompatible with the internal market - Annulment of the contested measure by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))
(2019/C 44/64)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: VMS Deutschland Holdings GmbH (Darmstadt, Germany) (represented by: initially, D. Pohl, G. Burwitz, M. Maier and P. Werner, then, D. Pohl and G. Burwitz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and M. Adam, then, R. Lyal, T. Maxian Rusche and K. Blanck, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: initially T. Henze, K. Petersen and R. Kanitz, then, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and K. Stranz and finally, T. Henze, R. Kanitz and S. Eisenberg, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision 2011/527/EU of 26 January 2011 on State aid C 7/10 (ex CP 250/09 and NN 5/10) implemented by Germany — Scheme for the carry-forward of tax losses in the case of restructuring of companies in difficulty (Sanierungsklausel) (OJ 2011 L 235, p. 26).

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on the action;










2.


The European Commission is ordered to pay its own costs as well as those incurred by VMS Deutschland Holdings GmbH;










3.


The Federal Republic of Germany is ordered to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.