do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-648/18: Action brought on 22 October 2018 — Super bock group, SGPS v EUIPO — Agus (Crystal)
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cereal product, coffee, confectionery product, instant product, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, tea, trade-mark law








C_2019016EN.01005601.xml










14.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 16/56






Action brought on 22 October 2018 — Super bock group, SGPS v EUIPO — Agus (Crystal)
(Case T-648/18)
(2019/C 16/66)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Super bock group, SGPS SA (Leça do Balio, Portugal) (represented by: J. Mioludo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Agus sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Crystal — Application for registration No 15 016 728

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 July 2018 in Case R 299/2018-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


refuse EU Registration No 15 016 728 Crystal for all the covered goods;










—


order EUIPO and AGUS sp. z o.o. to bear their own costs and pay those of the appellant.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council
Case C-660/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 22 October 2018 — Sundair GmbH v WV and Others
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, transport licence, traveller








C_2019025EN.01002101.xml










21.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/21






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 22 October 2018 — Sundair GmbH v WV and Others
(Case C-660/18)
(2019/C 25/25)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Sundair GmbH

Defendant: WV, XU, YT, represented by XU and ZS

Question referred

Is Article 7(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 5(1)(c), of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, (1) to be interpreted as meaning that affected passengers are entitled to compensation for the cancellation of a flight even when the air carrier does not hold a valid operating licence within the meaning of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EU) No 261/2004, the cancellation is at least in part attributable to the absence of a valid operating licence and the passengers had no knowledge of the fact that there was no operating licence at the time of booking?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.
Case C-661/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 22 October 2018 — CTT — Correios de Portugal v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, business activity, principle of proportionality, tax relief, tax return, taxpayer








C_2019025EN.01002201.xml










21.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/22






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD) (Portugal) lodged on 22 October 2018 — CTT — Correios de Portugal v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira
(Case C-661/18)
(2019/C 25/26)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa — CAAD)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: CTT — Correios de Portugal

Defendant: Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira

Questions referred







1.


Do the principles of neutrality, effectiveness, equivalence and proportionality preclude an interpretation of Article 98(2) of the VAT Code to the effect that it does not apply to situations where deductions which have already been made are altered or adjusted?










2.


Do those principles preclude legislation such as Article 23(1)(b) and (6) of the VAT Code, interpreted to the effect that a taxable person, who had opted for a coefficient method and/or allocation key in order to calculate the right to deduct tax paid on goods and services of mixed use and who had made the correction on the basis of the final amounts for the year to which the deduction related, pursuant to Article 23(6), may not retroactively alter those amounts by recalculating the initial deduction which has already been adjusted in accordance with that provision following a retroactive VAT assessment relating to an activity which it had initially regarded as being exempt?
Case T-628/18: Action brought on 22 October 2018 — E.J. Papadopoulos v EUIPO — Europastry (fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre)
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, cereal product, confectionery, confectionery product, frozen product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018455EN.01003101.xml










17.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 455/31






Action brought on 22 October 2018 — E.J. Papadopoulos v EUIPO — Europastry (fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre)
(Case T-628/18)
(2018/C 455/41)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.J. Papadopoulos S.A. (Moschato-Tavros, Greece) (represented by: C. Chrysanthis, P.–V. Chardalia and A. Vasilogamvrou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Europastry, SA (Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Application for registration No 13 125 265

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2018 in Case R 493/2018-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO and Europastry, SA, if it becomes intervener, to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9060 — HP/Apogee) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: computer equipment, economic concentration, electronic device, merger control, printing








C_2019024EN.01000102.xml










21.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 24/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9060 — HP/Apogee)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 24/02)
On 22 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9060. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-659/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción de Badalona (Spain) lodged on 22 October 2018 — Criminal proceedings against VW
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European arrest warrant, lawyer, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2019035EN.01000901.xml










28.1.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 35/9






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Instrucción de Badalona (Spain) lodged on 22 October 2018 — Criminal proceedings against VW
(Case C-659/18)
(2019/C 35/11)
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Instrucción de Badalona

Party to the main proceedings

VW

Question referred

Must Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and, in particular, Article 3(2) of Directive 2013/48/EU (1) be interpreted as meaning that the right of access to a lawyer may justifiably be delayed where the suspect or accused fails to appear when first summoned by the court and a national, European or international arrest warrant is issued, and that the assistance of a lawyer and the entering of an appearance by the lawyer in the proceedings may be delayed until the warrant is executed and the suspect is brought to court by the police?


(1)  Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty (OJ 2013 L 294 p. 1).
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2018380EN.01000201.xml










22.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 380/2






Euro exchange rates (1)

19 October 2018
(2018/C 380/03)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1470 




JPY


Japanese yen


129,05 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4606 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88020 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3358 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1421 




ISK


Iceland króna


134,50 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,4518 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,867 




HUF


Hungarian forint


323,20 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3017 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6665 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,4544 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6065 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4947 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


8,9915 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7379 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5800 




KRW


South Korean won


1 296,11 




ZAR


South African rand


16,4499 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9489 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4295 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 420,06 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7681 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,605 




RUB


Russian rouble


75,2418 




THB


Thai baht


37,358 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,2362 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8911 




INR


Indian rupee


84,1230 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1615 of 22 October 2018 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Lucanica di Picerno’) (PGI)
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Basilicata, Italy, designation of origin, labelling, meat product, product designation








L_2018270EN.01000101.xml










29.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 270/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1615
of 22 October 2018
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Lucanica di Picerno’) (PGI)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Lucanica di Picerno’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Lucanica di Picerno’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Lucanica di Picerno’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. — Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 October 2018.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 153, 2.5.2018, p. 15.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1594 of 22 October 2018 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Bratislavský rožok/Pressburger Kipfel/Pozsonyi kifli (TSG)]
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Bratislava region, Slovakia, confectionery product, designation of origin, labelling, product designation








L_2018265EN.01000101.xml










24.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 265/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1594
of 22 October 2018
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Bratislavský rožok/Pressburger Kipfel/Pozsonyi kifli (TSG)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Slovakia's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the traditional speciality guaranteed ‘Bratislavský rožok’/‘Pressburger Kipfel’/‘Pozsonyi kifli’, registered under Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 729/2012 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(b) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Bratislavský rožok’/‘Pressburger Kipfel’/‘Pozsonyi kifli’ (TSG) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 October 2018.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 729/2012 of 8 August 2012 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Bratislavský rožok/Pressburger Kipfel/Pozsonyi kifli (TSG)) (OJ L 213, 10.8.2012, p. 9).

(3)  
            OJ C 19, 19.1.2018, p. 28.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.9016 — CMA CGM/Container Finance) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: carriage of goods, combined transport, delivery, economic concentration, intra-EU transport, merger control








C_2019273EN.01000101.xml










14.8.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 273/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.9016 — CMA CGM/Container Finance)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2019/C 273/01)
On 22 October 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9016. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-633/18: Action brought on 22 October 2018 — Rose Gesellschaft v EUIPO — Iviton (TON JONES)
Date: 2018-10-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018455EN.01003202.xml










17.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 455/32






Action brought on 22 October 2018 — Rose Gesellschaft v EUIPO — Iviton (TON JONES)
(Case T-633/18)
(2018/C 455/43)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Rose Gesellschaft mbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: R. Kornfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Iviton s. r. o. (Prešov, Slovakia)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘TON JONES’ — Application for registration No 15 109 614

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 July 2018 in Case R 2136/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to continue the opposition proceedings without applying the ground for dismissal used previously;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs;










—


in any event, not award the trade mark applicant any costs in respect of the proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.