do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2018354EN.01000101.xml










3.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/1






Euro exchange rates (1)

2 October 2018
(2018/C 354/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1543 




JPY


Japanese yen


131,46 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4561 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89043 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3815 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1354 




ISK


Iceland króna


129,70 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,4393 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,788 




HUF


Hungarian forint


323,47 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2907 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6671 




TRY


Turkish lira


6,9419 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6081 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4795 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,0442 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7523 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5862 




KRW


South Korean won


1 290,52 




ZAR


South African rand


16,6012 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9287 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4316 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 366,44 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7805 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,680 




RUB


Russian rouble


75,4537 




THB


Thai baht


37,365 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,6002 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,6631 




INR


Indian rupee


84,7000 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-623/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy v Gorzowie Wielkopolskim (Poland) lodged on 3 October 2018 — Prokuratura Rejonowa w Słubicach v BQ
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Poland, admissibility, criminal proceedings, disciplinary proceedings, drug traffic, judge, narcotic, national law, right to justice








C_2020433EN.01001502.xml










14.12.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 433/15






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy v Gorzowie Wielkopolskim (Poland) lodged on 3 October 2018 — Prokuratura Rejonowa w Słubicach v BQ
(Case C-623/18)
(2020/C 433/18)
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy v Gorzowie Wielkopolskim

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Prokuratura Rejonowa w Słubicach

Defendant: BQ
By order of 6 October 2020, the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) ruled that the request for a preliminary ruling is manifestly inadmissible.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 October 2018 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the period of application of the optional reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud (COM(2018)0298 – C8-0265/2018 – 2018/0150(CNS))
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: European tax cooperation, VAT, fight against crime, goods and services, tax avoidance, tax harmonisation, tax offence








C_2020011EN.01009201.xml










13.1.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 11/92






P8_TA(2018)0367
VAT: period of application of the reverse charge mechanism and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 October 2018 on the proposal for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the period of application of the optional reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of certain goods and services susceptible to fraud and of the Quick Reaction Mechanism against VAT fraud (COM(2018)0298 – C8-0265/2018 – 2018/0150(CNS))
(Special legislative procedure – consultation)
(2020/C 011/21)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2018)0298),










—


having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0265/2018),










—


having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0283/2018),












1.


Approves the Commission proposal;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Case T-313/17: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2018 — Wajos v EUIPO (Form of a container) (EU trade mark — Application for a three-dimensional trade mark — Form of a container — Absolute ground for refusal — Distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage, flavouring, foodstuff, glass, packaging product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018427EN.01005501.xml










26.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 427/55






Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2018 — Wajos v EUIPO (Form of a container)
(Case T-313/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for a three-dimensional trade mark - Form of a container - Absolute ground for refusal - Distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2018/C 427/70)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Wajos GmbH (Dohr, Germany) (represented by: J. Schneiders, R. Krillke and B. Schneiders, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Graul and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 February 2017 (Case R 1526/2016-1) concerning an application for registration of a three-dimensional sign consisting of the form of a container as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 February 2017 (Case R 1526/2016-1);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8713 — Tata Steel/thyssenkrupp/JV) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agricultural equipment, economic concentration, flat product, iron and steel industry, merger control, metallurgical industry, mining industry








C_2018354EN.01000401.xml










3.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/4






Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8713 — Tata Steel/thyssenkrupp/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 354/04)

1.   
On 25 September 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Tata Steel Limited (‘Tata Steel’, India),










—


thyssenkrupp AG (‘thyssenkrupp’, Germany),










—


a newly created joint venture (‘JV’, The Netherlands).




Tata Steel and thyssenkrupp acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the JV.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Tata Steel: diversified steel producer, mining of coal and iron ore, manufacture of steel products, and selling of steel products globally; production of ferro-alloys and related minerals, and manufacture of certain other products such as agricultural equipment and bearings,
—   for thyssenkrupp: diversified industrial group active in the production of flat carbon steel products, material services, elevator technology, industrial solution and components technology,
—   for JV: production and sell of flat carbon steel products. Tata Steel and thyssenkrupp will each bring into the joint venture a number of their existing assets.


3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.8713 — Tata Steel/thyssenkrupp/JV
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Case C-621/18: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Edinburgh (United Kingdom) made on 3 October 2018 — Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Union membership, withdrawal from the EU








C_2018445EN.01001001.xml










10.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 445/10






Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Session, Edinburgh (United Kingdom) made on 3 October 2018 — Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
(Case C-621/18)
(2018/C 445/12)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Session, Edinburgh

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Andy Wightman, Ross Greer, Alyn Smith, David Martin, Catherine Stihler, Jolyon Maugham, Joanna Cherry

Defendant: Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

Other parties to the procedure: Chris Leslie, Tom Brake

Question referred

Where, in accordance with Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union, a Member State has notified the European Council of its intention to withdraw from the European Union, does EU law permit that notice to be revoked unilaterally by the notifying Member State; and, if so, subject to what conditions and with what effect relative to the Member State remaining within the European Union?
Case T-871/16: Order of the General Court of 3 October 2018 — Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v INEA
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: action programme, executive agency, invitation to tender, reduction of gas emissions, trans-European network








C_2018436EN.01006402.xml










3.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 436/64






Order of the General Court of 3 October 2018 — Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v INEA
(Case T-871/16) (1)

(2018/C 436/90)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Fourth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 104, 30.4.2017.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 October 2018 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register (COM(2018)0349 – C8-0371/2018 – 2018/0181(CNS))
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: administrative cooperation, computer system, disclosure of information, electronic document management, exchange of information, excise duty, information storage and retrieval, tax avoidance, tax evasion








C_2020011EN.01009301.xml










13.1.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 11/93






P8_TA(2018)0368
Administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 3 October 2018 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EU) No 389/2012 on administrative cooperation in the field of excise duties as regards the content of electronic register (COM(2018)0349 – C8-0371/2018 – 2018/0181(CNS))
(Special legislative procedure – consultation)
(2020/C 011/22)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2018)0349),










—


having regard to Article 113 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0371/2018),










—


having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A8-0285/2018),












1.


Approves the Commission proposal;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Alsace, France, air transport, intra-EU transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2018354EN.01000201.xml










3.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/2






Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 354/02)






Member State


France




Route concerned


Strasbourg-Munich




Date of entry into force of the public service obligation


9 April 2019




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 14 September 2018 imposing a public service obligation on scheduled air services between Strasbourg and Munich
NOR: TRAA1824085A
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
For further information please contact:





Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile




DTA/SDT/T2




50 rue Henry Farman




75 720 Paris Cedex 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321




osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitations to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Alsace, France, air transport, intra-EU transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2018354EN.01000301.xml










3.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 354/3






Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Invitations to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 354/03)






Member State


France




Routes concerned


Strasbourg-Amsterdam
Strasbourg-Madrid
Strasbourg-Munich




Period of validity of the contract


From 9 April 2019 to 8 April 2022




Deadline for the submission of applications and tenders


5 December 2018, by 17.00 Paris time (France)




Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained







Direction de la Sécurité de l’Aviation civile Nord-Est




Aéroport de Strasbourg-Entzheim




CS 60003 Entzheim




67836 Tanneries Cedex




FRANCE




Tel. +33 388596386




dsac-ne-osp-bf@aviation-civile.gouv.fr
Case T-186/17: Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2018 — Unipreus v EUIPO — Wallapop (wallapop) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark wallapop — Prior national figurative mark wala w — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Similarity of the services)
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet site, advertising, electronic commerce, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2018427EN.01005301.xml










26.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 427/53






Judgment of the General Court of 3 October 2018 — Unipreus v EUIPO — Wallapop (wallapop)
(Case T-186/17) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark wallapop - Prior national figurative mark wala w - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Similarity of the services)
(2018/C 427/68)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Unipreus, SL (Lleida, Spain) (represented by: C. Rivadulla Oliva, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Bernabeu, D. Gája and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Wallpop, SL, (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: X. Fàbrega Sabaté and J. Sánchez Sánchez-Crespo, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2017 (Case R 2350/2015-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Unipreus and Wallapop.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2017, in so far as it found that the services at issue in Case R 2350/2015-5 were different;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Unipreus, SL;










4.


Orders Wallapop, SL, to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1476 of 3 October 2018 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: European Commission, Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iraq, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, trade restriction








L_2018249EN.01000101.xml










4.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 249/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1476
of 3 October 2018
         
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation.












(2)


On 28 September 2018, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entry from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.












(3)


Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 October 2018.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,


Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments






(1)  
            OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6.




ANNEX
In Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003, the following entry is deleted:







‘128.


STATE ENTERPRISE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY (alias STATE ENTERPRISE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRIES). Address: P.O. Box 138, Iskandariya-Babylon, Iraq.’
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/832 of 5 June 2018 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for cyantraniliprole, cymoxanil, deltamethrin, difenoconazole, fenamidone, flubendiamide, fluopicolide, folpet, fosetyl, mandestrobin, mepiquat, metazachlor, propamocarb, propargite, pyrimethanil, sulfoxaflor and trifloxystrobin in or on certain products (OJ L 140, 6.6.2018)
Date: 2018-10-03
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: consumer protection, cotton, food inspection, food safety, foodstuff, fruit, market approval, pesticide, pesticide residue, vegetable








L_2018247EN.01000901.xml










3.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 247/9







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/832 of 5 June 2018 amending Annexes II, III and V to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for cyantraniliprole, cymoxanil, deltamethrin, difenoconazole, fenamidone, flubendiamide, fluopicolide, folpet, fosetyl, mandestrobin, mepiquat, metazachlor, propamocarb, propargite, pyrimethanil, sulfoxaflor and trifloxystrobin in or on certain products

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 140 of 6 June 2018
)


On page 76, in the Annex, in the amendments to Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, in point (2), in the table:
for











‘0140020 


Cherries (sweet)


0,3



1,5



 


2 (*)




0140030 


Peaches


0,5


0,8


 



50’





read











‘0140020 


Cherries (sweet)


0,3


2


 


2 (*)




0140030 


Peaches


0,5



1,5



 



50’