do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-607/18 P: Appeal brought on 24 September 2018 by NKT Verwaltungs GmbH, formerly nkt cables GmbH, NKT A/S, formerly NKT Holding A/S against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2018 in Case T-447/14: NKT Verwaltungs and NKT v Commission
Date: 2018-09-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: cartel, control of restrictive practices, electric cable, restriction on competition, rights of the defence, sanction (EU)








C_2018427EN.01003001.xml










26.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 427/30






Appeal brought on 24 September 2018 by NKT Verwaltungs GmbH, formerly nkt cables GmbH, NKT A/S, formerly NKT Holding A/S against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 12 July 2018 in Case T-447/14: NKT Verwaltungs and NKT v Commission
(Case C-607/18 P)
(2018/C 427/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellants: NKT Verwaltungs GmbH, formerly nkt cables GmbH, NKT A/S, formerly NKT Holding A/S (represented by: B. Creve, advocaat, M. Kofmann, advokat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:






—


set aside the judgment under appeal in whole or in part;










—


annul the decision at issue (1) in whole or in part;










—


in the alternative, refer the case back to the General Court for determination in accordance with the judgment of the Court of Justice;










—


order a measure of organisation; and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs of both the appeal proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

First plea: The General Court erroneously determined the territorial scope of the infringement.
Second plea: The General Court committed errors in law when assessing the scope of the SCI (2) and the scope of NKT’s participation in and awareness of the SCI.
Third plea: The General Court committed errors in law when holding that the appellants’ rights of defence had not been infringed.
Fourth plea: The General Court committed errors in law when rejecting the appellants’ plea for an annulment or reduction of the fine.


(1)  Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

(2)  Single and continuous infringement.