do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-67/18 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Dominique Bilde v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Admissibility — European Parliament — Rules governing the [payment of] expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, abuse of power, civil rights, damages, debt, equal treatment, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, proof, rights of the defence








C_2018399EN.01001402.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/14






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Dominique Bilde v European Parliament, Council of the European Union
(Case C-67/18 P) (1)

((Appeal - Admissibility - European Parliament - Rules governing the [payment of] expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid))
(2018/C 399/19)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Dominique Bilde (represented by: G. Sauveur, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and G. Corstens, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A.F. Jensen, M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part.










2.


Ms Dominique Bilde shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Case C-346/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Christoph Klein v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany (Appeal — Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU — Non-contractual liability of the European Union — Directive 93/42/EEC — Medical devices — Article 8(1) and (2) — Safeguard clause procedure — Notification by a Member State of a decision prohibiting the placing on the market of a medical device — Absence of a decision by the European Commission — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link between the conduct of the institution and the damage alleged — Evidence of the existence and extent of the damage)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EC conformity marking, damages, market approval, medical device, product safety








C_2018399EN.01000902.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/9






Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Christoph Klein v European Commission, Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-346/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Directive 93/42/EEC - Medical devices - Article 8(1) and (2) - Safeguard clause procedure - Notification by a Member State of a decision prohibiting the placing on the market of a medical device - Absence of a decision by the European Commission - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Causal link between the conduct of the institution and the damage alleged - Evidence of the existence and extent of the damage))
(2018/C 399/11)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Christoph Klein (represented by: H.-J. Ahlt, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen, A. Sipos and A.C. Becker, acting as Agents), Federal Republic of Germany

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 28 September 2016, Klein v Commission (T-309/10 RENV, not published, EU:T:2016:570), in so far as it held that Mr Christoph Klein had not established the existence of a direct and sufficient causal link capable of engaging the European Union’s liability;










2.


Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;










3.


Dismisses the action brought by Mr Christoph Klein seeking compensation for the damage allegedly sustained following a breach by the European Commission of its obligations under Article 8 of Council Directive 93/42/EEC of 14 June 1993 concerning medical devices;










4.


Orders Mr Christoph Klein and the European Commission to bear their own costs in relation to both the proceedings at first instance and the appeal proceedings;










5.


Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to bear its own costs in relation to the proceedings at first instance.






(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.
Case T-527/18: Action brought on 6 September 2018 — K.A. Schmersal Holding v EUIPO — Tecnium (tec.nicum)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, computer equipment, industrial research, provision of services, registered trade mark, scientific research, software, trade-mark law








C_2018381EN.01003001.xml










22.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 381/30






Action brought on 6 September 2018 — K.A. Schmersal Holding v EUIPO — Tecnium (tec.nicum)
(Case T-527/18)
(2018/C 381/35)
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: K.A. Schmersal Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Wuppertal, Germany) (represented by: A. Haudan, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tecnium, SA (Manresa, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘tec.nicum’ — European Union trade mark No 13 626 791

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 June 2018 in Case R 2427/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far as it confirms the dismissal of the application for registration of the contested mark for Class 42;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


No genuine use of the mark on which the opposition is based;










—


Incorrect identification of the relevant public;










—


No similarity between the services;










—


No similarity between the opposing marks;










—


No likelihood of confusion.
Case C-84/18 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Sophie Montel v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Admissibility — European Parliament — Rules governing the [payment of] expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Member of the European Parliament, abuse of power, civil rights, damages, debt, equal treatment, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, proof, rights of the defence








C_2018399EN.01001501.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/15






Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Sophie Montel v European Parliament, Council of the European Union
(Case C-84/18 P) (1)

((Appeal - Admissibility - European Parliament - Rules governing the [payment of] expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament - Parliamentary assistance allowance - Recovery of sums unduly paid))
(2018/C 399/20)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Sophie Montel (represented by: G. Sauveur, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and G. Corstens, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: A.F. Jensen, M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible in part and manifestly unfounded in part.










2.


Ms Sophie Montel shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2017/2455 of 5 December 2017 amending Directive 2006/112/EC and Directive 2009/132/EC as regards certain value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods (OJ L 348, 29.12.2017)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: VAT, broadcasting, electronic commerce, import (EU), provision of services, tax exemption, tax harmonisation, telecommunications, third country








L_2018225EN.01000101.xml










6.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 225/1







Corrigendum to Council Directive (EU) 2017/2455 of 5 December 2017 amending Directive 2006/112/EC and Directive 2009/132/EC as regards certain value added tax obligations for supplies of services and distance sales of goods

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 348 of 29 December 2017
)


On page 18, in point (30) of Article 2, in point (e) of the new Article 369p(3):
for:







‘(e)


his individual identification number allocated in accordance with Article 369q(3).’,





read:







‘(e)


his individual identification number allocated in accordance with Article 369q(2).’.
Case C-472/17: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2018 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di L’Aquila — Italy) — Gabriele Di Girolamo v Ministero della Giustizia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Social policy — Fixed-term employment — Magistrates — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European social policy, magistrate, temporary employment








C_2018399EN.01001302.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/13






Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2018 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di L’Aquila — Italy) — Gabriele Di Girolamo v Ministero della Giustizia
(Case C-472/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Social policy - Fixed-term employment - Magistrates - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2018/C 399/17)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Giudice di pace di L’Aquila

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Gabriele Di Girolamo

Defendant: Ministero della Giustizia

Intervener: Unione Nazionale Giudici di Pace (Unagipa)

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di L’Aquila (Magistrates Court, L’Aquila, Italy), by decision of 31 July 2017, is manifestly inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, Latium, Lombardy, Sardinia, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2018314EN.01001201.xml










6.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 314/12






Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 314/10)






Member State


Italy




Routes concerned


Alghero-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa
Alghero-Milan Linate and vice versa
Cagliari-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa
Cagliari-Milan Linate and vice versa
Olbia-Rome Fiumicino and vice versa
Olbia-Milan Linate and vice versa




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 April 2019




Address where the text and any information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


For further information:





Autonomous Region of Sardinia




Department of Transport




Directorate-General for Transport




Service for Maritime and Air Transport and Territorial Continuity




Via XXIX Novembre 1847, 27-41




09123 Cagliari




ITALY




Tel. +39 0706067331




Fax +39 0706067309











Website


:


http://www.regione.sardegna.it
http://www.mit.gov.it















Email


:


trasporti@pec.regione.sardegna.it
trasporti@regione.sardegna.it
trasp.osp@regione.sardegna.it
Case T-533/18: Action brought on 6 September 2018 — Wanda Films and Wanda Visión v EUIPO — Dalian Wanda Group Co. (WANDA FILMS)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, audiovisual equipment, education, electronic device, film industry, publishing, registered trade mark, satellite navigation, signalling device, trade-mark law








C_2018399EN.01004601.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/46






Action brought on 6 September 2018 — Wanda Films and Wanda Visión v EUIPO — Dalian Wanda Group Co. (WANDA FILMS)
(Case T-533/18)
(2018/C 399/61)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Wanda Films, SL (Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain) ans Wanda Visión, SA (Pozuelo de Alarcón) (represented by: C. Planas Silva, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Dalian Wanda Group Co. Ltd (Dalian, China)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Wanda Films, SL

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark WANDA FILMS — Application for registration No 13 912 829

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 June 2018 in Case R 401/2017-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


admit the present application, the arguments and documents (including the ones presented with this application and the ones presented by the applicant during the opposition and appeal proceedings);










—


override the contested decision;










—


issue a decision that admits the registration of the trade mark defended by the applicant with the present application.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Case T-129/18: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2018 — HMV (Brands) v EUIPO — Our Price Records (OUR PRICE)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet site, advertising, electronic commerce, registered trade mark, retail trade, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law








C_2018427EN.01010304.xml










26.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 427/103






Order of the General Court of 6 September 2018 — HMV (Brands) v EUIPO — Our Price Records (OUR PRICE)
(Case T-129/18) (1)

(2018/C 427/139)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Ninth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 161, 7.5.2018.
Case C-471/17: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Tariff and statistical nomenclature — Classification of goods — Fried instant noodles — Tariff subheading 1902 30 10)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, instant product, pasta, specification of tariff heading








C_2018399EN.01001101.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/11






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
(Case C-471/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff - Tariff and statistical nomenclature - Classification of goods - Fried instant noodles - Tariff subheading 1902 30 10))
(2018/C 399/13)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hannover

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the version resulting from Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 927/2012 of 9 October 2012, must be interpreted as meaning that subheading 1902 30 10 thereof covers instant noodle dishes, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, which are, in essence, composed of a block of pre-cooked and fried noodles.


(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.
Case C-17/17: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — United Kingdom) — Grenville Hampshire v The Board of the Pension Protection Fund (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer — Directive 2008/94/EC — Article 8 — Supplementary pension schemes — Protection of entitlement to old-age benefits — Minimum level of protection guaranteed)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: direct applicability, employer, financial solvency, supplementary pension, wage earner








C_2018399EN.01000602.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/6






Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal — United Kingdom) — Grenville Hampshire v The Board of the Pension Protection Fund
(Case C-17/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer - Directive 2008/94/EC - Article 8 - Supplementary pension schemes - Protection of entitlement to old-age benefits - Minimum level of protection guaranteed))
(2018/C 399/07)
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Grenville Hampshire

Respondent: The Board of the Pension Protection Fund

Interested party: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 8 of Directive 2008/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer must be interpreted as meaning that every individual employee must receive old-age benefits corresponding to at least 50 % of the value of his accrued entitlement under a supplementary occupational pension scheme in the event of his employer’s insolvency.










2.


In circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, Article 8 of Directive 2008/94 has direct effect and may, therefore, be invoked before a national court by an individual employee in order to challenge a decision of a body such as the Board of the Pension Protection Fund.






(1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1218 of 6 September 2018 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: European Commission, Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iraq, economic sanctions, international sanctions, legal person, trade restriction








L_2018226EN.01000301.xml










7.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 226/3








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/1218
of 6 September 2018
         
amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation.












(2)


On 28 August 2018, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entry from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.












(3)


Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 6 September 2018.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,


Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments






(1)  
            OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6.




ANNEX
In Annex III to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003, the following entry is deleted:







‘201.


TAJI INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX. Address: P.O. Box 526, Baghdad/Alwyiyah Kadhmiyah/Taji, Baghdad, Iraq.’
Case C-547/17 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Basic Net SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — EU trade mark — Figurative trade mark representing three vertical stripes — Proof of distinctive character acquired through use)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018399EN.01001102.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/11






Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Basic Net SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
(Case C-547/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Figurative trade mark representing three vertical stripes - Proof of distinctive character acquired through use))
(2018/C 399/14)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Basic Net SpA (represented by: D. Sindico, avvocato)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Basic Net SpA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 13, 15.1.2018.
Case T-339/18: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2018 — Enterprise Holdings v EUIPO (E PLUS)
Date: 2018-09-06
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, hotel industry, maintenance, miscellaneous industries, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, software, telecommunications, trade-mark law, vehicle rental








C_2018427EN.01010401.xml










26.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 427/104






Order of the General Court of 6 September 2018 — Enterprise Holdings v EUIPO (E PLUS)
(Case T-339/18) (1)

(2018/C 427/140)
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.