do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-559/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2018 — TDK-Lambda Germany GmbH v Hauptzollamt Lörrach
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, computer system, data processing, electronic device, specification of tariff heading, telecommunications equipment








C_2018436EN.01002301.xml










3.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 436/23






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2018 — TDK-Lambda Germany GmbH v Hauptzollamt Lörrach
(Case C-559/18)
(2018/C 436/31)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Baden-Württemberg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: TDK-Lambda Germany GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Lörrach

Question referred

Is the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (1) as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1218/2012 [of the European Parliament and of the Council] of 12 December 2012 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, (2) to be interpreted as meaning that static converters such as those in the present case are to be classified under subheading 8504 4030 only if they are used principally with telecommunication apparatus, automatic data-processing machines and units thereof, or is it sufficient, for the purpose of satisfying the characteristic ‘of a kind used’, if the converters can also, in view of their objective characteristics, be used with telecommunication apparatus, automatic data-processing machines and units thereof, in addition to other applications?


(1)  OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1.

(2)  OJ 2012 L 351, p. 36.
Case C-561/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2018 — Solvay Chemicals GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: environmental monitoring, greenhouse gas, industrial pollution, pollution control measures, reduction of gas emissions








C_2019103EN.01000602.xml










18.3.2019   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/6






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 4 September 2018 — Solvay Chemicals GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-561/18)
(2019/C 103/07)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Solvay Chemicals GmbH

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany
By order of 6 February 2019, the Court (First Chamber) ruled as follows:
The second subparagraph of Article 49(1) of Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) and point 20(B) of Annex IV to that regulation are invalid in so far as they systematically include the carbon dioxide (CO2) transferred to another installation for the production of precipitated calcium carbonate in the emissions of the installation for production of soda ash, regardless of whether that CO2 is released into the atmosphere.


(1)  OJ 2012 L 181, p. 30.
Case T-579/17: Order of the General Court of 4 September 2018 — Wall Street Systems UK v ECB
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative transparency, award of contract, equal treatment, invitation to tender, tendering








C_2018427EN.01010302.xml










26.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 427/103






Order of the General Court of 4 September 2018 — Wall Street Systems UK v ECB
(Case T-579/17) (1)

(2018/C 427/137)
Language of the case: English
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Corrigendum to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, signed at Luxembourg on 16 June 2008 (OJ L 164, 30.6.2015)
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom
Subjects: Bosnia and Herzegovina, stabilisation and association agreement








L_2018223EN.01001901.xml










4.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 223/19







Corrigendum to the Stabilisation and Association Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Bosnia and Herzegovina, of the other part, signed at Luxembourg on 16 June 2008
         

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 164 of 30 June 2015
)


In Protocol 7, Annex II, Appendix 1, Part B (In Bosnia and Herzegovina), Heading (A) (Wines originating in Bosnia and Herzegovina), Subheading ‘Region/Subregion’, first entry:
for:


                  ‘Middle Neretva’,

read:


                  ‘Srednja Neretva’.
Council Decision of 4 September 2018 adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2018
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU expenditure, amending budget, budgetary resources, draft budget (EU), financial year, general budget (EU)




C_2018314EN.01000301.xml










6.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 314/3






COUNCIL DECISION
of 4 September 2018
adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2018
(2018/C 314/04)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,
Whereas:






—


the Union’s budget for the financial year 2018 was definitively adopted on 30 November 2017 (2),










—


on 31 May 2018, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 4 to the general budget for the financial year 2018,




HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article
The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2018 was adopted on 4 September 2018.
The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/


Done at Brussels, 4 September 2018.


For the Council


The President

G. BLÜMEL




(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 57, 28.2.2018, p. 1.
Case T-528/18: Action brought on 4 September 2018 — XI v Commission
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: damages, medical data, protection of privacy








C_2018408EN.01005502.xml










12.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 408/55






Action brought on 4 September 2018 — XI v Commission
(Case T-528/18)
(2018/C 408/72)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: XI (represented by: N. Lhöest, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the Commission’s decision of 25 May 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint in so far as that decision contains medical data;










—


order the Commission to pay damages and interest, assessed ex aequo et bono at EUR 5 000 in compensation for the non-material harm suffered; and










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging a breach of Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights, together with a breach of the duty of good administration and the duty of care, in so far as the decision refusing the applicant’s claim disclosed medical data which were, moreover, manifestly incorrect.
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 September 2018 — Euro exchange rates
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest, money








C_2018312EN.01000201.xml










4.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 312/2






Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
0,00 % on 1 September 2018
Euro exchange rates (2)

3 September 2018
(2018/C 312/02)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1609 




JPY


Japanese yen


129,03 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4536 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90158 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,5806 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1268 




ISK


Iceland króna


125,10 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,7020 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,749 




HUF


Hungarian forint


326,58 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2952 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6338 




TRY


Turkish lira


7,7104 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,6109 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5175 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1129 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7565 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5925 




KRW


South Korean won


1 291,04 




ZAR


South African rand


17,2753 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9219 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4328 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 290,44 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7908 




PHP


Philippine peso


62,141 




RUB


Russian rouble


79,0830 




THB


Thai baht


38,014 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,7859 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,3082 




INR


Indian rupee


82,6735 






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-244/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2018 — European Commission v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Decision (EU) 2017/477 — Position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Cooperation Council established under the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part, as regards the working arrangements of the Cooperation Council, the Cooperation Committee, specialised subcommittees or any other bodies — Article 218(9) TFEU — Decision establishing the positions to be adopted on behalf of the European Union in a body set up by an international agreement — Agreement some of whose provisions may be linked with the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Voting rule)
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Association Council (EU), Kazakhstan, common foreign and security policy, cooperation agreement (EU), cooperation policy








C_2018399EN.01000901.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/9






Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 September 2018 — European Commission v Council of the European Union
(Case C-244/17) (1)

((Action for annulment - Decision (EU) 2017/477 - Position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Cooperation Council established under the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part, as regards the working arrangements of the Cooperation Council, the Cooperation Committee, specialised subcommittees or any other bodies - Article 218(9) TFEU - Decision establishing the positions to be adopted on behalf of the European Union in a body set up by an international agreement - Agreement some of whose provisions may be linked with the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) - Voting rule))
(2018/C 399/10)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Havas, L. Gussetti and P. Aalto, acting as Agents, subsequently by L. Havas and L. Gussetti, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and P. Mahnič Bruni, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Council Decision (EU) 2017/477 of 3 March 2017 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Cooperation Council established under the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Kazakhstan, of the other part as regards the working arrangements of the Cooperation Council, the Cooperation Committee, specialised subcommittees or any other bodies;










2.


Orders that the effects of Decision 2017/477 be maintained in force;










3.


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.
Case T-194/18: Order of the General Court of 4 September 2018 — Rewe-Beteiligungs-Holding International v EUIPO — Wessanen Benelux (BonNatura) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018427EN.01007702.xml










26.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 427/77






Order of the General Court of 4 September 2018 — Rewe-Beteiligungs-Holding International v EUIPO — Wessanen Benelux (BonNatura)
(Case T-194/18) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate)
(2018/C 427/104)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Rewe-Beteiligungs-Holding International GmbH (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: S. Brandstätter, M. Kinkeldey and J. Rosenhäger, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Sesma Merino and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Wessanen Benelux BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 January 2013 (Case R 949/2017-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Wessanen Benelux and Rewe-Beteiligungs-Holding International.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Rewe-Beteiligungs-Holding International GmbH is ordered to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018.
Council Decision of 4 September 2018 adopting the Council’s position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019
Date: 2018-09-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU expenditure, budgetary resources, draft budget (EU), financial year, general budget (EU)




C_2018314EN.01000401.xml










6.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 314/4






COUNCIL DECISION
of 4 September 2018
adopting the Council’s position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019
(2018/C 314/05)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314(3) thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and in particular Article 106a thereof,
Whereas:






1.


On 21 June 2018, the Commission submitted a proposal containing the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019 (1),










2.


The Council examined the Commission proposal with a view to defining a position consistent, on the revenue side, with Council Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom of 26 May 2014 on the system of own resources of the European Union (2), and, on the expenditure side, with Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (3),




HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article
The Council’s position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2019 was adopted by the Council on 4 September 2018.
The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/


Done at Brussels, 4 September 2018.


For the Council


The President

G. BLÜMEL




(1)  COM(2018) 600 final.

(2)  OJ L 168, 7.6.2014, p. 105.

(3)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884.