do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,00 % on 1 August 2018 — Euro exchange rates
Date: 2018-08-02
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Central Bank, euro, exchange rate, financing, interest, money








C_2018271EN.01000101.xml










2.8.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/1






Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):
0,00 % on 1 August 2018
Euro exchange rates (2)

1 August 2018
(2018/C 271/01)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1696 




JPY


Japanese yen


130,81 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4514 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89040 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,2995 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1589 




ISK


Iceland króna


123,40 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5380 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,590 




HUF


Hungarian forint


321,36 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2720 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6240 




TRY


Turkish lira


5,7654 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5767 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5231 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1807 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7187 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5922 




KRW


South Korean won


1 307,40 




ZAR


South African rand


15,5145 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,9519 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4020 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 889,02 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7556 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,940 




RUB


Russian rouble


73,4672 




THB


Thai baht


38,725 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,4028 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,8040 




INR


Indian rupee


79,9705 






(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-186/17: Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 2 August 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Iberia Express SA
Date: 2018-08-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: airline, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, traveller








C_2018399EN.01003001.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/30






Order of the President of the Third Chamber of the Court of 2 August 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin — Germany) — flightright GmbH v Iberia Express SA
(Case C-186/17) (1)

(2018/C 399/37)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 221, 10.7.2017.
Case C-507/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 2 August 2018 — NH v Associazione Avvocatura per i diritti LGBTI — Rete Lenford
Date: 2018-08-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: collective interest, damages, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, lawyer, non-profit organisation, professional society, protection of minorities, recruitment, right of action








C_2018436EN.01001601.xml










3.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 436/16






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 2 August 2018 — NH v Associazione Avvocatura per i diritti LGBTI — Rete Lenford
(Case C-507/18)
(2018/C 436/20)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: NH

Respondent: Associazione Avvocatura per i diritti LGBTI — Rete Lenford

Questions referred







1.


Must Article 9 of Directive 2000/78/EC (1) be interpreted as meaning that an association composed of lawyers specialised in the judicial protection of LGBTI persons, the statutes of which state that its objective is to promote LGBTI culture and respect for the rights of LGBTI persons, automatically, as a legal person having a collective interest and as a non-profit association, has standing to bring proceedings, including in respect of a claim for damages, in circumstances of alleged discrimination against LGBTI persons?










2.


On a proper construction of Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2000/78/EC, does a statement expressing a negative opinion with regard to homosexuals, whereby, in an interview given during a radio entertainment programme, the interviewee stated that he would never appoint an LGBTI person to his law firm nor wish to use the services of such persons, fall within the scope of the anti-discrimination rules laid down in that directive, even if that statement does not relate to any current or planned recruitment procedure by the interviewee?






(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8666 — Uralchem/Uralkali) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-08-02
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, fertiliser industry, merger control, potash








C_2018297EN.01000102.xml










23.8.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 297/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8666 — Uralchem/Uralkali)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 297/02)
On 2 August 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8666. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case C-594/17: Order of the President of the Court of 2 August 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, supported by: Kingdom of Belgium, Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Estonia, Kingdom of Spain, French Republic, Italian Republic
Date: 2018-08-02
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: budget deficit, budget estimate, national budget, national implementing measure, national planning








C_2018399EN.01003003.xml










5.11.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/30






Order of the President of the Court of 2 August 2018 — European Commission v Republic of Slovenia, supported by: Kingdom of Belgium, Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Estonia, Kingdom of Spain, French Republic, Italian Republic
(Case C-594/17) (1)

(2018/C 399/39)
Language of the case: Slovene
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 412, 4.12.2017.
Case T-490/20: Action brought on 2 August 2020 — CH and CN v Parliament
Date: 2018-08-02
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, damages, freedom of self-determination, harassment at work, psychological harassment








C_2020329EN.01001801.xml










5.10.2020   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 329/18






Action brought on 2 August 2020 — CH and CN v Parliament
(Case T-490/20)
(2020/C 329/36)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: CH and CN (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


declare their application admissible;










—


annul the contested decisions, in that they do not adopt a final decision on the veracity of the alleged occurrences of psychological harassment;










—


order the defendant to pay each applicant EUR 5 000ex aequo et bono by way of compensation for the non-material damage caused by undue delay, to be increased by late payment interest until paid in full;










—


order the defendant to pay each applicant EUR 100 000ex aequo et bono by way of compensation for the non-material damage caused by the failure to adopt a final decision on the veracity of alleged occurrences of psychological harassment, to be increased by late payment interest until paid in full;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants rely on two pleas in law in support of the action against the decisions of the Parliament of 13 September 2019 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution, in response to their requests for assistance, did not adopt a final decision on the veracity of the alleged occurrences of psychological harassment.






1.


First plea in law, alleging breach of the duty of assistance and infringement of Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union (‘the Staff Regulations’), on the ground that by failing to adopt a final decision on the existence of the alleged occurrences of psychological harassment, the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of the Parliament breached the duty of assistance which it must observe.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging breach of the duty of care and the principle of sound administration, and violation of the right to dignity and infringement of Articles 1 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, on the ground that by failing to adopt a final decision on the existence of the alleged occurrences of psychological harassment, the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of the Parliament breached the principle of sound administration and its duty of care, thereby violating the human dignity of the applicants.
Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems — Average costs of benefits in kind
Date: 2018-08-02
Institutions: Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems, European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, family benefit, fringe benefit, migrant worker, redemption, social-security harmonisation








C_2018271EN.01000201.xml










2.8.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/2






ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION FOR THE COORDINATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS
AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND
(2018/C 271/02)
AVERAGE COSTS OF BENEFITS IN KIND — 2015

Application of Article 64 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 (1)









I.


The amounts to be refunded with regard to the benefits in kind provided in 2015 to family members who do not reside in the same Member State as the insured person, as referred to in Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (2), will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:








 


Age group


Annual


Net monthly
x = 0,20 




United Kingdom


under 20 years


GBP 802,32 


GBP 53,49 




20-64 years


GBP 1 760,01 


GBP 117,33 




65 years and over


GBP 5 121,12 


GBP 341,41 
















II.


The amounts to be refunded with regard to benefits in kind provided in 2015 to pensioners and members of their family, as provided for in Article 24(1) and Articles 25 and 26 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004, will be determined on the basis of the following average costs:









 


Age group


Annual


Net monthly x = 0,20 


Net monthly
x = 0,15  (3)





United Kingdom


under 20 years


GBP 802,32 


GBP 53,49 


GBP 56,83 




20-64 years


GBP 1 760,01 


GBP 117,33 


GBP 124,67 




65 years and over


GBP 5 121,12 


GBP 341,41 


GBP 362,75 










(1)  OJ L 284, 30.10.2009, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 166, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

(3)  The reduction applied to the monthly fixed amount shall be equal to 15 % (x = 0,15) for pensioners and members of their family when the competent Member State is not listed in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 (according to Article 64(3) of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009).