do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-428/18: Action brought on 12 July 2018 — McDreams Hotel v EUIPO — McDonald’s International Property (mc dreams hotels Träumen zum kleinen Preis!)
Date: 2018-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, hotel industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018319EN.01002001.xml










10.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/20






Action brought on 12 July 2018 — McDreams Hotel v EUIPO — McDonald’s International Property (mc dreams hotels Träumen zum kleinen Preis!)
(Case T-428/18)
(2018/C 319/24)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: McDreams Hotel GmbH (Feldkirchen, Germany) (represented by: S. Schenk, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: McDonald’s International Property Co. Ltd (Wilmington, Delaware, United States).

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark mc dreams hotels Träumen zum kleinen Preis! — Application for registration No 1 47 35 435

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 April 2018 in Case R 972/2017-2.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order the defendant to bear the applicant’s costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Art. 8(1)(b) and Art. 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8869 — Ryanair/LaudaMotion) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-07-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, low cost airline, merger control








C_2018366EN.01000101.xml










10.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 366/1






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8869 — Ryanair/LaudaMotion)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 366/01)
On 12 July 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8869. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Joined Cases C-397/17 and C-398/17: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — Profit Europe NV v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 — Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Subheadings 7307 11 10, 7307 19 10 and 7307 19 90 — Cast tube or pipe fittings, of spheroidal graphite cast iron)
Date: 2018-07-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, carbon, cast-iron, common customs tariff, metalworking, piping, specification of tariff heading, tube








C_2018319EN.01001102.xml










10.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/11






Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — Profit Europe NV v Belgische Staat
(Joined Cases C-397/17 and C-398/17) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Subheadings 7307 11 10, 7307 19 10 and 7307 19 90 - Cast tube or pipe fittings, of spheroidal graphite cast iron))
(2018/C 319/13)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Profit Europe NV

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Operative part of the judgment

The Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1001/2013 of 4 October 2013, must be interpreted as meaning that the cast tube or pipe fittings of spheroidal graphite cast iron must be classified under subheading 7307 19 90 thereof.


(1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.
Case T-446/14: Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Taihan Electric Wire v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for power cables — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Single and continuous infringement — Insurmountable barriers to entry — Inapplicability of Article 101 — Duration of involvement — Equal treatment — Calculation of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Date: 2018-07-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU market, cartel, control of restrictive practices, electric cable, equal treatment, jurisdiction, restriction on competition, sanction (EU), value of trade








C_2018328EN.01003601.xml










17.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 328/36






Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2018 — Taihan Electric Wire v Commission
(Case T-446/14) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European market for power cables - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Single and continuous infringement - Insurmountable barriers to entry - Inapplicability of Article 101 - Duration of involvement - Equal treatment - Calculation of the fine - Value of sales - Gravity of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances - Unlimited jurisdiction))
(2018/C 328/48)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Taihan Electric Wire Co. Ltd (Anyang-Si, South Korea) (represented by: R. Antonini and E. Monard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan, C. Giolito and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2139 final of 2 April 2014 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39610 — Power cables) in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, a reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Taihan Electric Wire Co. Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 282, 25.8.2014.