do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
Date: 2018-06-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, North Korea, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2018214EN.01000201.xml










19.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 214/2





Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 and Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
(2018/C 214/02)
The following information is brought to the attention of Mr HYON Chol-hae (no. 3), Mr PAK Jae-gyong (no. 6), Mr KIM Jong-gak (no. 16), Mr KIM Won-hong (no. 18) and Mr SON Chol-ju (no. 21), persons appearing in Part I of Annex II to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 (1) and in Part (a) of Annex XV to Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 (2) concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.
The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 27 June 2018, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




Any observations received before 11 July 2018 will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council’s periodic review, in accordance with Article 36(2) of Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 and Article 47a(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1509.


(1)  OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 79.

(2)  OJ L 224, 31.8.2017, p. 1.
Case C-404/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 19 June 2018 — Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon, Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van Vrouwen en Mannen v WTG Retail BVBA
Date: 2018-06-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: equal treatment, gender equality, harassment at work, witness protection








C_2018311EN.01000801.xml










3.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/8






Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen (Belgium) lodged on 19 June 2018 — Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon, Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van Vrouwen en Mannen v WTG Retail BVBA
(Case C-404/18)
(2018/C 311/07)
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Arbeidsrechtbank Antwerpen

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Jamina Hakelbracht, Tine Vandenbon, Instituut voor de Gelijkheid van Vrouwen en Mannen

Defendant: WTG Retail BVBA

Question referred

Should European Union law and, more specifically, Article 24 of Directive 2006/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation, be interpreted as precluding national legislation which affords protection against retaliation to persons who act as witnesses only to persons who, in the context of the investigation of a complaint, bring to the notice of the person with whom the complaint is lodged, in a signed and dated document, the facts which they have personally seen or heard and which relate to the situation which is the subject of the complaint filed or who appear as witnesses in legal proceedings?


(1)  OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23.
Case T-375/18: Action brought on 19 June 2018 — Gollnisch v Parliament
Date: 2018-06-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EP delegation, Member of the European Parliament, indemnification, official visit








C_2018364EN.01001201.xml










8.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 364/12






Action brought on 19 June 2018 — Gollnisch v Parliament
(Case T-375/18)
(2018/C 364/12)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Bruno Gollnisch (Villiers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that the decision of the President of the Delegation for Relations with Japan, notified on 20 March 2018, is unlawful;










—


annul that decision;










—


annul both implicit decisions rejecting the complaints submitted to the President of the European Parliament and the Secretary-General of the European Parliament on 2 May 2018;










—


revoke the acts and measures adopted after the abovementioned acts;










—


award the applicant the amount of EUR 1 in compensation for the non-material harm he suffered as a result of his being excluded from the parliamentary visit and the failure to have regard to the compensation to which he was entitled;










—


also award him the amount of EUR 3 500 in compensation for the expenses incurred in preparing this action, and










—


order the European Parliament to pay all costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law: infringement of the implementing provisions governing the work of delegations and missions of Members of the European Parliament outside the European Union.










2.


Second plea in law: breach of the right to an effective remedy and to good administration.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8829 — Total Produce/Dole Food Company) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-06-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: distributive trades, economic concentration, fruit, merger control, sale, vegetable








C_2018214EN.01000701.xml










19.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 214/7





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8829 — Total Produce/Dole Food Company)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 214/07)

1.   
On 11 June 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


Total Produce PLC (Republic of Ireland),










—


DFC Holdings LLC (The United States).




Total Produce PLC (‘Total Produce’) will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the whole of DFC Holdings LLC, and indirectly in its wholly-owned subsidiary, Dole Food Company Incorporated (together referred to as ‘Dole’).
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.


2.   
The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for Total Produce: Import and distribution of a wide range of fresh fruit and vegetables, including bananas and pineapples. Total Produce also operates banana ripening centres. Total Produce is active worldwide, with its geographic focus being Europe,
—   for Dole: Production, sales and distribution of fresh fruit and vegetables, including bananas and pineapples, in North America, Europe, Latin America, South Africa and Dubai, with a principal geographic focus on North America.


3.   

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.



4.   
The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.8829 — Total Produce/Dole Food Company
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË







(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-06-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, Limousin, Rhône-Alpes, air transport, inland transport, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2018214EN.01000601.xml










19.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 214/6





Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 214/06)






Member State


France




Route concerned


Limoges (Bellegarde) – Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)




Date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 January 2019




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


Order of 28 May 2018 imposing public service obligations on scheduled air services between Limoges and Lyon (Saint-Exupéry)
NOR: TRAA1810014A
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
For further information please contact:





Direction Générale de l’Aviation Civile




DTA/SDT/T2




50 rue Henry Farman




75 720 Paris cedex 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321




osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8945 — Permira/Cisco (Target Businesses)) (Text with EEA relevance.)
Date: 2018-06-19
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: digital technology, economic concentration, information technology industry, investment company, merger control, provision of services, television








C_2018223EN.01000501.xml










27.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/5





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8945 — Permira/Cisco (Target Businesses))
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 223/03)
On 19 June 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8945. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.