do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2018-04-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2018139EN.01001001.xml










20.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/10





Euro exchange rates (1)

19 April 2018
(2018/C 139/08)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2382 




JPY


Japanese yen


132,88 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4478 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86975 




SEK


Swedish krona


10,3778 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1976 




ISK


Iceland króna


123,30 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,5825 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,327 




HUF


Hungarian forint


310,37 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1664 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6570 




TRY


Turkish lira


4,9838 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5892 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5606 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,7182 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6938 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6208 




KRW


South Korean won


1 314,38 




ZAR


South African rand


14,7813 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7717 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4120 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


17 070,75 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8085 




PHP


Philippine peso


64,432 




RUB


Russian rouble


75,2875 




THB


Thai baht


38,644 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,1925 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,4668 




INR


Indian rupee


81,4580 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-15/17: Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2018 — Mitrakos v EUIPO — Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark YAMAS — Earlier EU word mark LLAMA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-04-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018190EN.01002502.xml










4.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/25





Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2018 — Mitrakos v EUIPO — Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS)
(Case T-15/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark YAMAS - Earlier EU word mark LLAMA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 190/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dimitrios Mitrakos (Palaio Faliro, Greece) (represented by: D. Bakopanou, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Kusturovic and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Juan Ignacio Belasco Baquedano (Viana, Spain) (represented by P. Merino Baylos, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 October 2016 (Case R 532/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Belasco Baquedano and Mr Mitrakos.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Dimitrios Mitrakos to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea apply
Date: 2018-04-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, North Korea, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data








C_2018139EN.01000901.xml










20.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/9





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea apply
(2018/C 139/07)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director-General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/1509.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil the listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with Section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 224, 31.8.2017, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran
Date: 2018-04-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Iran, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2018139EN.01000701.xml










20.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/7





Notice for the attention of certain persons subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran
(2018/C 139/05)
The following information is brought to the attention of IRGC Brigadier-General Javad DARVISH-VAND (no. 1), IRGC Brigadier-General Mohammad Reza NAQDI (no. 8), Mr. Rostam QASEMI (no. 10) and IRGC Brigadier-General Amir Ali Haji ZADEH (no. 19), persons appearing in the Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (1) and in Annex IX to Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Iran.
The Council intends to maintain the restrictive measures against the above-mentioned persons with new statements of reasons. Those persons are hereby informed that they may submit a request to the Council to obtain the intended statements of reasons for their designation, before 27 April 2018, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




Any observations received before 11 May 2018 will be taken into account for the purpose of the Council's periodic review.


(1)  OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39.

(2)  OJ L 88, 24.3.2012, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8838 — Kerry Group/Korys Investments/Proparent) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2018-04-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consumer goods, economic concentration, flavouring, foodstuff, information technology industry, investment company, merger control, protein products, retail trade








C_2018139EN.01000601.xml










20.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/6





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8838 — Kerry Group/Korys Investments/Proparent)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 139/03)
On 13 April 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8838. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-439/16: Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2018 — holyGhost v EUIPO — CBM (holyGhost) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark holyGhost — Earlier EU word mark HOLY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-04-20
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, leather, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018190EN.01002401.xml










4.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/24





Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2018 — holyGhost v EUIPO — CBM (holyGhost)
(Case T-439/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark holyGhost - Earlier EU word mark HOLY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 190/43)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: holyGhost GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Wiedemann and D. Engbrink, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by A. Schifko and subsequently by D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 May 2016 (Case R 2867/2014-5), concerning opposition proceedings between CBM and holyGhost.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


The action is dismissed;










2.


HolyGhost GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 350, 26.9.2016.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8330 — Maersk Line/HSDG) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2018-04-20
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, inland waterway transport, merger control








C_2018139EN.01000602.xml










20.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/6





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8330 — Maersk Line/HSDG)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 139/04)
On 10 April 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8330. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.