do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-218/18: Action brought on 29 March 2018 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission
Date: 2018-03-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Germany, Rhineland-Palatinate, State aid, airline, airport, control of State aid








C_2018190EN.01003601.xml










4.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/36





Action brought on 29 March 2018 — Deutsche Lufthansa v Commission
(Case T-218/18)
(2018/C 190/60)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: A. Martin-Ehlers, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the European Commission of 31 July 2017 in Case SA.47969, C(2017)5289 — Hahn Airport;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant alleges, in essence, the following:






—


procedural errors, as the defendant made a ‘deal’ with the Federal Republic of Germany with regard to the assessment of the aid granted to Flughafen Frankfurt-Hahn GmbH (‘FFHG’) and Ryanair;










—


failure to take into account certain essential factual elements, despite the fact that the defendant was fully aware of these at the time when the contested decision was adopted;










—


partially incorrect representation of the facts of the case;










—


failure to take into account other aid in favour of FFHG that was ultimately passed on to Ryanair as the principal user of the airport.
Case C-236/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 29 March 2018 — GRDF SA v Eni Gas & Power France SA, Direct énergie, Commission de régulation de l’énergie, Procureur général près la Cour d’appel de Paris
Date: 2018-03-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: contract, energy distribution, energy law, natural gas, supervisory power








C_2018190EN.01001401.xml










4.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/14





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France) lodged on 29 March 2018 — GRDF SA v Eni Gas & Power France SA, Direct énergie, Commission de régulation de l’énergie, Procureur général près la Cour d’appel de Paris
(Case C-236/18)
(2018/C 190/19)
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: GRDF SA

Respondents: Eni Gas & Power France SA, Direct énergie, Commission de régulation de l’énergie, Procureur général près la Cour d’appel de Paris

Question referred

Is Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009, (1) and in particular Article 41(11) thereof, to be interpreted as requiring that a regulatory authority, when settling a dispute, must have power to issue a decision which applies to the whole of the period to which that dispute relates, regardless of the date on which that dispute arose between the parties, in particular by drawing the consequences of the non-conformity of a contract with the provisions of the directive by means of a decision taking effect as regards the whole of the contractual period?


(1)  Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC (OJ 2009 L 211, p. 94).