do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-194/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 19 March 2018 — Jadran Dodič v BANKA KOPER, ALTA INVEST
Date: 2018-03-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: financial occupation, financial services, labour law, provision of services, transfer of businesses








C_2018190EN.01001001.xml










4.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/10





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 19 March 2018 — Jadran Dodič v BANKA KOPER, ALTA INVEST
(Case C-194/18)
(2018/C 190/13)
Language of the case: Slovenian

Referring court

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Jadran Dodič

Respondents: BANKA KOPER, ALTA INVEST

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 1(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that a transfer, such as that which took place in the circumstances of the present case, relating to financial instruments and other client assets (specifically, transferable securities), the accounts relating to clients’ intangible debt securities and other financial and ancillary services, as well as the records, must be deemed to be a legal transfer of an undertaking or of part of an undertaking, bearing in mind that, after the first respondent ceased to engage in business as a stock-exchange intermediary, the decision whether provision of such services was to be entrusted to the second defendant was, ultimately, a matter for the clients?










2.


In the circumstances described above, is the number of clients who, following the cessation of the first respondent’s activities as a stock-exchange intermediary, now use the second respondent for the provision of those services, relevant?










3.


Is the fact that the first respondent continues to provide services to the clients as a dependant financial promotion company and, in performing that role, cooperates with the second respondent, relevant in any way for the purpose of determining whether there was a transfer of a business or an undertaking?






(1)  Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (OJ L 82, 22.3.2001, p. 16).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8816 — Goldman Sachs/Centerbridge/Robyg) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2018-03-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: banking, building industry, economic concentration, investment, investment company, merger control, property market, real property, securities








C_2018103EN.01000101.xml










19.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8816 — Goldman Sachs/Centerbridge/Robyg)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 103/01)
On 12 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8816. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to 2018 Call for proposals — Multi programmes — Grants to information provision and promotion measures concerning agricultural products implemented in the internal market and in third countries in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council (OJ C 9, 12.1.2018)
Date: 2018-03-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU aid, EU programme, agricultural product, aid to agriculture, competitiveness, invitation to tender, product quality, public awareness campaign, single market, third country




C_2018103EN.01000801.xml










19.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/8





Corrigendum to 2018 Call for proposals — Multi programmes — Grants to information provision and promotion measures concerning agricultural products implemented in the internal market and in third countries in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1144/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 9 of 12 January 2018
)
(2018/C 103/09)
On page 33, Section 3, ‘Timetable’, first sentence:

for:


‘12 April 2018’,


read:


‘19 April 2018’.

On page 33, Section 3, ‘Timetable’, in the table:

for:




‘(d)
   
Deadline for submitting applications
 12.4.2018’,


read:




‘(d)
   
Deadline for submitting applications
 19.4.2018’.

On page 43, Section 8.2, ‘Operational capacity’, the third paragraph is deleted.
On page 44, Section 9, ‘Award criteria’, second last paragraph, numbered list (a), (b) and (c):

for:

‘… criteria:






(a)


the total of the remaining foreseen amount for the three topics on the internal market shall be allocated to the projects targeting the internal market with the highest quality score, irrespective of the topic for which they have applied;










(b)


the same approach shall be taken for proposals targeting third countries (Topics 4–6);










(c)


if the foreseen amount is still not exhausted, the remaining amounts for both internal market and third countries shall be merged and assigned to projects with the highest quality score, irrespective of the priority and topic for which they have applied.’,





read:


‘… criterion:
the total of the remaining foreseen amount for all four topics shall be merged and assigned to projects with the highest quality score, irrespective of the topic for which they have applied.’.

On page 46, Section 11.4, ‘Funding forms, eligible and ineligible costs’, under ‘Eligible costs’, first indent:

for:


‘Eligible (direct and indirect) costs are indicated in the grant agreement (see Article 6 par.1, 2 and 3).’,


read:


‘Eligible (direct and indirect) costs are indicated in the grant agreement (see Article 6 par. 1 and 2).’.
Case T-229/16: Order of the General Court of 19 March 2018 –Pio de Bragança v EUIPO — Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (QUIS UT DEUS) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS — Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2018-03-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, jewellery and goldsmith's articles, metal product, precious stones, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018166EN.01002902.xml










14.5.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 166/29





Order of the General Court of 19 March 2018 –Pio de Bragança v EUIPO — Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (QUIS UT DEUS)
(Case T-229/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS - Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark - Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2018/C 166/38)
Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties


Applicant: Duarte Pio de Bragança (Sintra, Portugal) (represented by: J. Sardinha, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J. Motta Veiga, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2016 (Case R 621/2015-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Duarte Pio De Bragança and Ordem de São Miguel da Ala.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.
Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 concerning restrictive measures against Somalia apply
Date: 2018-03-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU restrictive measure, Somalia, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person, personal data








C_2018103EN.01000201.xml










19.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/2





Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 concerning restrictive measures against Somalia apply
(2018/C 103/03)
The attention of data subjects is drawn to the following information in accordance with Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1):
The legal basis for this processing operation is Council Regulation (EU) No 356/2010 (2).
The controller of this processing operation is the Council of the European Union represented by the Director General of DG C (Foreign Affairs, Enlargement, Civil Protection) of the General Secretariat of the Council and the department entrusted with the processing operation is the Unit 1C of DG C that can be contacted at:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




DG C 1C




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




Email: sanctions@consilium.europa.eu




The purpose of the processing operation is the establishment and updating of the list of persons subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 356/2010.
The data subjects are the natural persons who fulfil listing criteria as laid down in that Regulation.
The personal data collected includes data necessary for the correct identification of the person concerned, the Statement of Reasons and any other data related thereto.
The personal data collected may be shared as necessary with the European External Action Service and the Commission.
Without prejudice to restrictions provided for in Article 20(1)(a) and (d) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001, requests for access, as well as requests for rectification or objection will be answered in accordance with section 5 of Council Decision 2004/644/EC (3).
Personal data will be retained for 5 years from the moment the data subject has been removed from the list of persons subject to the asset freeze or the validity of the measure has expired, or for the duration of court proceedings in the event they had been started.
Data subjects may have recourse to the European Data Protection Supervisor in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.


(1)  OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 105, 27.4.2010, p. 1.

(3)  OJ L 296, 21.9.2004, p. 16.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.8766 — LKQ/Stahlgruber) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2018-03-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Economic Area, economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry, retail trade, vehicle parts, wholesale trade








C_2018103EN.01000701.xml










19.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/7





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case M.8766 — LKQ/Stahlgruber)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 103/08)






1.


On 9 March 2018, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).
This notification concerns the following undertakings:






—


LKQ Corporation (‘LKQ’, United States),










—


Stahlgruber GmbH (‘Stahlgruber’, Germany), controlled by Stahlgruber Otto Gruber AG.




LKQ acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Stahlgruber.
The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:
—   for LKQ: the manufacturing and supply of automotive spare parts, and the wholesale distribution of automotive spare parts in the EEA. LKQ has also some activities in retail of automotive spare parts and related equipment.
—   for Stahlgruber: the manufacturing and supply of automotive spare parts, and the wholesale distribution of automotive spare parts in the EEA.










3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:
M.8766 — LKQ/Stahlgruber
Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:





Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu




Fax +32 22964301




Postal address:




European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).
Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/459 of 19 March 2018 amending Decision 2011/173/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Date: 2018-03-19
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Bosnia and Herzegovina, EU restrictive measure, economic sanctions, international sanctions








L_2018077EN.01001701.xml










20.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 77/17








            COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2018/459
of 19 March 2018
         
amending Decision 2011/173/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/173/CFSP (1), concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina.












(2)


On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, those restrictive measures should be renewed until 31 March 2019.












(3)


Decision 2011/173/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The second paragraph of Article 6 of Decision 2011/173/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘This Decision shall apply until 31 March 2019.’.



Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 19 March 2018.


For the Council


The President

F. MOGHERINI
            





(1)  Council Decision 2011/173/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 68).