do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Decision (EU) 2018/665 of the Plenary Session of the Single Resolution Board of 15 March 2018 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget and on the closure of the accounts of the Single Resolution Board for the financial year 2016 (SRB/PS/2018/02)
Date: 2018-03-15
Institutions: Single Resolution Board
Subjects: EU banking union, EU office or agency, budgetary discharge, closing of accounts, financial year








L_2018110EN.01014001.xml










30.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 110/140








            DECISION (EU) 2018/665 OF THE PLENARY SESSION OF THE SINGLE RESOLUTION BOARD
         
of 15 March 2018
         
on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget and on the closure of the accounts of the Single Resolution Board for the financial year 2016 (SRB/PS/2018/02)


THE SINGLE RESOLUTION BOARD IN ITS PLENARY SESSION,

Having regard to Article 50(1)(b) and 63(8) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (1),


Having regard to Article 103, 104 and 105 of the SRB Financial Regulation,


Having regard to the final Annual Accounts of the SRB for the financial year 2016 as approved in its meeting of 22 June 2017,


Having regard to the Annual Activity Report of the SRB for the financial year 2016 as adopted in its meeting of 22 June 2017,


Having regard to the Court of Auditors' Annual Report comprising the statement of assurance on the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions and sound financial management for the financial year 2016, together with the SRB's replies,


Having regard to the Auditors' Report pursuant to Article 92(4) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 on any contingent liabilities (whether for the Single Resolution Board, the Council, the Commision or otherwise), arising as a result of the performance by the Single Resolution Board, the Council and the Commission of their tasks under this Regulation for the financial year 2016, together with the replies of the SRB, the Council and the Commission.

HAS DECIDED TO:








1.


Grant the Chair of the SRB discharge in respect of the implementation of the SRB's budget for the financial year 2016;










2.


Approve the closure of the accounts of the SRB for the financial year 2016;










3.


Set out its observations in the motion below;










4.


Instruct the Chair of the Single Resolution Board to notify this Decision to the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, and on the website of the SRB.







Done at Brussels, 15 March 2018.


For the Plenary Session of the Board


SRB Plenary Session Member

Tuija TAOS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 225, 30.7.2014, p. 1.
Case T-1/17: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — La Mafia Franchises v EUIPO — Italy (La Mafia SE SIENTA A LA MESA) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark La Mafia SE SIENTA A LA MESA — Absolute ground for refusal — Whether contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality — Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-03-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business management, catering industry, consultancy, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018152EN.01003102.xml










30.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/31





Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — La Mafia Franchises v EUIPO — Italy (La Mafia SE SIENTA A LA MESA)
(Case T-1/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark La Mafia SE SIENTA A LA MESA - Absolute ground for refusal - Whether contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality - Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 152/38)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: La Mafia Franchises, SL (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: I. Sempere Massa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by D. Del Gaizo, avvocato dello Stato)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 October 2016 (Case R 803/2016-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between the Italian Republic and La Mafia Franchises.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders La Mafia Franchises, SL, to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.
Case T-507/15: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — Poland v Commission (EAGF — Expenditure excluded from financing — Regulation (EC) No 2200/96, Directive 2002/55/EC, Regulations (EC) No 1432/2003, (EC) No 1433/2003, (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 885/2006, (EC) No 1182/2007, (EC) No 1234/2007, (EC) No 1580/2007 and (EU) No 1306/2013 — Expenditure effected by Poland — Risk to EAGF — On-the-spot checks — Recognition criteria of a producer organisation — Discrepancies between language versions — Financial correction)
Date: 2018-03-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EAFRD, EAGF, EU aid, agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, producer organisation, rural development








C_2018152EN.01002501.xml










30.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/25





Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — Poland v Commission
(Case T-507/15) (1)

((EAGF - Expenditure excluded from financing - Regulation (EC) No 2200/96, Directive 2002/55/EC, Regulations (EC) No 1432/2003, (EC) No 1433/2003, (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 885/2006, (EC) No 1182/2007, (EC) No 1234/2007, (EC) No 1580/2007 and (EU) No 1306/2013 - Expenditure effected by Poland - Risk to EAGF - On-the-spot checks - Recognition criteria of a producer organisation - Discrepancies between language versions - Financial correction))
(2018/C 152/29)
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, K. Straś, M. Pawlicka and B. Paziewska, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and A. Stobiecka Kuik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the partial annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/1119 of 22 June 2015 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2015 L 182, p. 39).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the application;










2.


Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015.
Case T-205/17: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — SSP Europe v EUIPO (SECURE DATA SPACE) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark SECURE DATA SPACE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-03-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, data transmission, electrical equipment, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2018152EN.01003301.xml










30.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/33





Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — SSP Europe v EUIPO (SECURE DATA SPACE)
(Case T-205/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark SECURE DATA SPACE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 152/40)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: SSP Europe GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: B. Bittner, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Tóhatí and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 January 2017 (Case R 2467/2015-5) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign SECURE DATA SPACE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders SSP Europe GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 22.5.2017.
Case T-279/17: Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — Hermann Bock v EUIPO (Push and Ready) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark Push and Ready — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-03-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, furniture industry, medical device, metal furniture, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018152EN.01003302.xml










30.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/33





Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — Hermann Bock v EUIPO (Push and Ready)
(Case T-279/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark Push and Ready - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 152/41)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Hermann Bock GmbH (Verl, Germany) (represented by: S. Maaßen and V. Schoene, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: W. Schramek and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 January 2017 (Case R 1279/2016-5) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign Push and Ready as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Hermann Bock GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.
Case C-575/16: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 March 2018 — European Commission v Czech Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Article 49 TFEU — Freedom of establishment — Notaries — Nationality requirement — Article 51 TFEU — Connection with the exercise of official authority)
Date: 2018-03-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to a profession, discrimination on the basis of nationality, equal treatment, law of states, nationality, notary, right of establishment








C_2018166EN.01001501.xml










14.5.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 166/15





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 March 2018 — European Commission v Czech Republic
(Case C-575/16) (1)

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Notaries - Nationality requirement - Article 51 TFEU - Connection with the exercise of official authority))
(2018/C 166/18)
Language of the case: Czech

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and K. Walkerová, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller, J. Vláčil and A. Kasalická, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU;










2.


Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.