do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
Date: 2018-03-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), originating product, photovoltaic cell, semi-metal, solar collector








C_2018095EN.01000601.xml










13.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/6





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures
(2018/C 95/06)
1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells)


The People’s Republic of China


Anti-dumping duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/367 of 1 March 2017 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council and terminating the partial interim review investigation pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 (OJ L 56, 3.3.2017, p. 131)


3.9.2018






(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
Date: 2018-03-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, packaging product








C_2018095EN.01000501.xml










13.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/5





Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union
(2018/C 95/05)
Pursuant to Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

On page 198








4202 31 00 to 4202 39 00




Articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag






The following text is inserted after the existing text:


‘Mobile phone cases of these subheadings are covered by the first part of the heading text and, consequently, may be made of any material.
They may be designed to fit a specific mobile phone or different models of mobile phones having the same measurements.
They may or may not have a closing mechanism. They encase the mobile phone by covering the back, the sides and the front side of the mobile phone in order to protect it. Simple cases covering only the back and the sides of the mobile phone are however excluded, as they do not have the characteristics of cases of heading 4202 and are classified according to their constituent material.
However, these subheadings do not include cases, whether or not with stands, for tablet Computers, mini-tablet Computers or e-books, because, due to their size, they are not considered as being articles normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag (classification under subheadings 4202 91 80 to 4202 99 00, according to the constituent material). These cases are covered by the first part of the heading text and may consist of any material.’


Page 327


The following text shall be inserted:








‘8473 30 80




Other parts and accessories of the machines of heading 8471

This subheading does not include cases, whether or not with stands, for tablet Computers (tablet) or mini-tablet Computers (mini-tablet) (heading 4202 or, if they do not have a front cover, according to their constituent material). Such cases are principally designed to protect the back, the sides and the front of a tablet or a mini-tablet and are, therefore, not considered an accessory of the machines of heading 8471 because they do not increase the range of operations of a tablet or a mini-tablet nor do they perform a particular service relative to the main function of the machine.’







(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1).

(2)  OJ C 76, 4.3.2015, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8767 — CDPQ/Hyperion Insurance Group) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2018-03-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, insurance company, investment company, merger control, reinsurance, supplementary pension








C_2018095EN.01000101.xml










13.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8767 — CDPQ/Hyperion Insurance Group)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 95/01)
On 6 March 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8767. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-567/17: Order of the General Court of 13 March 2018 — Disney Enterprises v EUIPO — Di Molfetta (DiSNEY FROZEN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for registration — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2018-03-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, clothing, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018161EN.01005102.xml










7.5.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/51





Order of the General Court of 13 March 2018 — Disney Enterprises v EUIPO — Di Molfetta (DiSNEY FROZEN)
(Case T-567/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2018/C 161/58)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Disney Enterprises, Inc. (Burbank, California, United States) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Fabio Di Molfetta (Bisceglie, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2017 (Case R 2342/2016-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Fabio Di Molfetta and Disney Enterprises, Inc.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Disney Enterprises, Inc., shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-subsidy measures
Date: 2018-03-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security, European Commission
Subjects: China, countervailing charge, import (EU), originating product, photovoltaic cell, semi-metal, solar collector








C_2018095EN.01000701.xml










13.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/7





Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-subsidy measures
(2018/C 95/07)
1.   As provided for in Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Union (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.
2.   Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury. Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.
3.   Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), CHAR 4/39, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.
4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037.









Product


Country(ies) of origin or exportation


Measures


Reference


Date of expiry (3)





Crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells)


People’s Republic of China


Anti-subsidy duty


Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/366 of 1 March 2017 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 18(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 of the European Parliament and of the Council and terminating the partial interim review investigation pursuant to Article 19(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 (OJ L 56, 3.3.2017, p. 1)


3.9.2018






(1)  OJ L 176, 30.6.2016, p. 55.

(2)  TRADE-Defence-Complaints@ec.europa.eu

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.
Case T-824/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2018 — Kiosked v EUIPO — VRT (K) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark K — Earlier Benelux figurative mark K — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-03-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business administration, business management, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2018152EN.01003101.xml










30.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/31





Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2018 — Kiosked v EUIPO — VRT (K)
(Case T-824/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark K - Earlier Benelux figurative mark K - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 152/37)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kiosked Oy Ab (Espoo, Finland) (represented by: L. Laaksonen, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: De Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie (VRT) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P.-Y. Thoumsin and E. Van Melkebeke, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2016 (Case R 279/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between VRT and Kiosked.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Kiosked Oy Ab to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by De Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie (VRT).






(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.