do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-159/17: Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2018 — Claro Sol Cleaning v EUIPO — Solemo (Claro Sol Facility Services desde 1972) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark Claro Sol Facility Services desde 1972 — Earlier national figurative mark SOL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-03-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business management, cleaning industry, organisation of transport, provision of services, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018142EN.01005001.xml










23.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/50





Judgment of the General Court of 8 March 2018 — Claro Sol Cleaning v EUIPO — Solemo (Claro Sol Facility Services desde 1972)
(Case T-159/17) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Claro Sol Facility Services desde 1972 - Earlier national figurative mark SOL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 142/66)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Claro Sol Cleaning, SLU (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Solemo Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: M. Müller and A. Fottner, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 January 2017 (Case R 478/2016-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Solemo and Claro Sol Cleaning.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 9 January 2017 (Case R 478/2016-1);










2.


Orders Solemo Oy to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Claro Sol Cleaning, SLU;










3.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.
Case T-167/18: Action brought on 8 March 2018 — Kanyama v Council
Date: 2018-03-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2018161EN.01006301.xml










7.5.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/63





Action brought on 8 March 2018 — Kanyama v Council
(Case T-167/18)
(2018/C 161/75)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Célestin Kanyama (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought







—


Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as the applicant remains at No 4 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP and No 4 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;










—


Rule that the provisions of Articles 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2016/2231/CFSP, and 2b(1)(b) of Regulation [No] 1183/2005/EC are unlawful;










—


Order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-163/18, Amisi Kumba v Council.
Case T-176/18: Action brought on 8 March 2018 — Mende Omalanga v Council
Date: 2018-03-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2018161EN.01006801.xml










7.5.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/68





Action brought on 8 March 2018 — Mende Omalanga v Council
(Case T-176/18)
(2018/C 161/84)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Lambert Mende Omalanga (Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought







—


Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as the applicant remains at No 12 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP and No 12 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;










—


Rule that the provisions of Articles 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2016/2231/CFSP, and 2b(1)(b) of Regulation [No] 1183/2005/EC are unlawful;










—


Order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-163/18, Amisi Kumba v Council.
Case T-177/18: Action brought on 8 March 2018 — Kazembe Musonda v Council
Date: 2018-03-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Democratic Republic of the Congo, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, ownership, principle of proportionality, protection of privacy, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2018161EN.01006802.xml










7.5.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 161/68





Action brought on 8 March 2018 — Kazembe Musonda v Council
(Case T-177/18)
(2018/C 161/85)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda (Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo) (represented by: T. Bontinck, P. De Wolf, M. Forgeois and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought







—


Annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/2282 of 11 December 2017 amending Decision 2010/788/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic Republic of the Congo, in so far as the applicant remains at No 11 in Annex II to Decision 2010/788/CFSP and No 11 in Annex Ia to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005;










—


Rule that the provisions of Articles 3(2)(b) of Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2016/2231/CFSP, and 2b(1)(b) of Regulation [No] 1183/2005/EC are unlawful;










—


Order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law, which are in essence identical or similar to those raised in Case T-163/18, Amisi Kumba v Council.
Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2017/1538 of the European Central Bank of 25 August 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/534 on reporting of supervisory financial information (ECB/2017/25) (OJ L 240, 19.9.2017)
Date: 2018-03-08
Institutions: European Central Bank
Subjects: accounting, disclosure of information, financial control, financial institution, financial instrument, international standard, standardised accounting system, technical specification








L_2018065EN.01004801.xml










8.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 65/48







Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2017/1538 of the European Central Bank of 25 August 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2015/534 on reporting of supervisory financial information (ECB/2017/25)


(
Official Journal of the European Union L 240 of 19 September 2017
)


On page 20, point 2(b) of Annex I:
for:







‘(b)


the following paragraph 3 is added:






“3.


As an exception to paragraph 2, each NCA may decide that entities referred to in paragraph 2 and established in its Member State report:






(a)


the information specified in template 9.1 or the information specified in template 9.1.1 from Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014;










(b)


the information specified in template 11.1 or the information specified in template 11.2 from Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014;










(c)


the information specified in template 12.0 or the information specified in template 12.1 from Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014”;’,













read:







‘(b)


the following paragraph 4 is added:






“4.


As an exception to paragraph 2, each NCA may decide that entities referred to in paragraph 2 and established in its Member State report:






(a)


the information specified in template 9.1 or the information specified in template 9.1.1 from Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014;










(b)


the information specified in template 11.1 or the information specified in template 11.2 from Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014;










(c)


the information specified in template 12.0 or the information specified in template 12.1 from Annex IV to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 680/2014”;’.