do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2382 of 14 December 2017 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to standard forms, templates and procedures for the transmission of information in accordance with Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 340, 20.12.2017)
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: European Commission, Secretariat-General
Subjects: credit institution, disclosure of information, exchange of information, financial control, financial instrument, financial legislation, investment company, management audit, provision of services, technical standard








L_2018033EN.01000501.xml










7.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 33/5







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2382 of 14 December 2017 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to standard forms, templates and procedures for the transmission of information in accordance with Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 340 of 20 December 2017
)


On page 21, in Annex VI, Part 2, Programme of operations, Business Plan and structural organisation of the branch, Systems & Controls:
for:






‘1.


safeguarding client money and assets;










4.


compliance with the conduct of business and other obligations that fall under the responsibility of the Competent Authority of the host Member State according to Art 35(8) and record keeping under Art 16(6);










5.


staff code of Conduct, including personal account dealing;










6.


anti-money laundering;










7.


monitoring and control of critical outsourcing arrangements (if applicable);










8.


the name, address and contact details of the accredited compensation scheme of which the investment firm is a member;’,




read:






‘1.


safeguarding client money and assets;










2.


compliance with the conduct of business and other obligations that fall under the responsibility of the Competent Authority of the host Member State according to Art 35(8) and record keeping under Art 16(6);










3.


staff code of Conduct, including personal account dealing;










4.


anti-money laundering;










5.


monitoring and control of critical outsourcing arrangements (if applicable);










6.


the name, address and contact details of the accredited compensation scheme of which the investment firm is a member;’.
Case T-793/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Zaharieva (Display box for cornets) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a display box for cornets — Earlier international registration designating Bulgaria — Ground for invalidity — Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use — Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 — Duty of diligence — Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, packaging product








C_2018104EN.01003502.xml










19.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/35





Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Zaharieva (Display box for cornets)
(Case T-793/16) (1)

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a display box for cornets - Earlier international registration designating Bulgaria - Ground for invalidity - Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use - Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 - Duty of diligence - Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002))
(2018/C 104/46)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Şehitkamil Gaziantep, Turkey) (represented by: T. Tsenova, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court: Elka Zaharieva (Plovdiv, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Kostov, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 September 2016 (Case R 1143/2015-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret and Mrs Zaharieva.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 September 2016 (Case R 1143/2015-3);










2.


Grants the application for a declaration that the design registered under number 002343244-0002 is invalid;










3.


Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;










4.


Orders Mrs Elka Zaharieva to bear her own costs.






(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.
Case C-439/17: Order of the President of the Court of 7 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — British American Tobacco (Germany) GmbH v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: flavouring, market approval, marketing standard, tobacco, tobacco industry








C_2018190EN.01002002.xml










4.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/20





Order of the President of the Court of 7 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hamburg — Germany) — British American Tobacco (Germany) GmbH v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg
(Case C-439/17) (1)

(2018/C 190/34)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.
Case T-852/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — Access Info Europe v European Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — EU-Turkey statements of 8 and 18 March 2016 — Implementation by the European Union or by the Member States of the measures concerned — Documents drawn up or received by the legal service of an institution — Legal advice — Analyses of the legality of the measures provided for in connection with the implementation of the EU-Turkey statement of 18 March 2016 — Refusal to grant access — Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations — Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 — Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings — Exception relating to the protection of legal advice)
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Türkiye, access to EU information, international relations, judicial proceedings, legal aid, legality, provision of documents, public statement








C_2018104EN.01003901.xml










19.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/39





Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — Access Info Europe v European Commission
(Case T-852/16) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - EU-Turkey statements of 8 and 18 March 2016 - Implementation by the European Union or by the Member States of the measures concerned - Documents drawn up or received by the legal service of an institution - Legal advice - Analyses of the legality of the measures provided for in connection with the implementation of the EU-Turkey statement of 18 March 2016 - Refusal to grant access - Article 4(1)(a) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of the public interest in respect of international relations - Second indent of Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings - Exception relating to the protection of legal advice))
(2018/C 104/50)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Access Info Europe (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: O. Brouwer, E. Raedts and J. Wolfhagen, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet and M. Konstantinidis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6030 final of 19 September 2016 confirming the refusal to grant the applicant access to documents from the Commission’s Legal Service which purportedly concern the legality of the measures adopted by the European Union and its Member States in implementing the actions set out in the statement of the Heads of State or Government of the European Union of 18 March 2016, adopted following their meeting with the Turkish Prime Minister on the same day.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Access Info Europe to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 February 2018 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal (13308/2017 — C8-0419/2017 — 2017/0821(CNS))
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Portugal, cross-frontier data flow, data protection, exchange of information, information system, personal data, vehicle registration








C_2018463EN.01009301.xml










21.12.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 463/93






P8_TA(2018)0031
Automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 7 February 2018 on the draft Council implementing decision on the launch of automated data exchange with regard to vehicle registration data in Portugal (13308/2017 — C8-0419/2017 — 2017/0821(CNS))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 463/22)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the Council draft (13308/2017),










—


having regard to Article 39(1) of the Treaty on European Union, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, and Article 9 of Protocol No 36 on transitional provisions, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0419/2017),










—


having regard to Council Decision 2008/615/JHA of 23 June 2008 on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism and cross-border crime (1), and in particular 33 thereof,










—


having regard to Rule 78c of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A8-0017/2018),












1.


Approves the Council draft;












2.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;












3.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament;












4.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.






(1)  OJ L 210, 6.8.2008, p. 1
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2018045EN.01000301.xml










7.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

6 February 2018
(2018/C 45/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2329 




JPY


Japanese yen


134,97 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4429 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88885 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,8685 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1571 




ISK


Iceland króna


125,00 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,7005 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,233 




HUF


Hungarian forint


310,65 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1644 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6445 




TRY


Turkish lira


4,6647 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5728 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5488 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,6403 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6955 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6314 




KRW


South Korean won


1 339,89 




ZAR


South African rand


14,8719 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7446 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4358 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 736,62 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,8268 




PHP


Philippine peso


63,544 




RUB


Russian rouble


70,7106 




THB


Thai baht


38,941 




BRL


Brazilian real


4,0381 




MXN


Mexican peso


23,1920 




INR


Indian rupee


79,2415 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-68/18: Action brought on 7 February 2018 — Fränkischer Weinbauverband v EUIPO (Shape of a bottle)
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage, glass, packaging product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018112EN.01004401.xml










26.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 112/44





Action brought on 7 February 2018 — Fränkischer Weinbauverband v EUIPO (Shape of a bottle)
(Case T-68/18)
(2018/C 112/55)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Fränkischer Weinbauverband eV. (Würzburg, Germany) (represented by: L. Petri and M. Gilch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: Tridimensional mark (Shape of a bottle) — Application for registration No 15 431 281

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2017 in Case R 413/2017-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.
Case T-775/16: Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ v EUIPO — Krasnyiy oktyabr (Representation of a crayfish) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a crayfish — Earlier international registration of the figurative mark РАКОВЫЕ ШЕЙКИ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, confectionery product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018104EN.01003501.xml










19.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/35





Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ v EUIPO — Krasnyiy oktyabr (Representation of a crayfish)
(Case T-775/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark representing a crayfish - Earlier international registration of the figurative mark РАКОВЫЕ ШЕЙКИ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 104/45)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by: R. Žabolienė and I. Lukauskienė, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court: Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ OAO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by O. Spuhler, M. Geitz and J. Stock, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2016 (Case R 2419/2015-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Moscow Confectionary Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ and Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 475, 19.12.2016.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8749 — Verdane/Vitruvian/Easypark) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, holding company, investment company, merger control, parking area, software








C_2018045EN.01000202.xml










7.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8749 — Verdane/Vitruvian/Easypark)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 45/04)
On 25 January 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8749. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to the Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (OJ C 3, 5.1.2018)
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: EU Member State, State aid, control of State aid








C_2018045EN.01000501.xml










7.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/5





Corrigendum to the Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 3 of 5 January 2018
)
(2018/C 45/07)
On page 3, case SA.47973 (2017/N), entry in the table for ‘Form of aid’:

for:

‘Direct grant/Interest rate subsidy’,


read:

‘Direct grant’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8597 — APG/Ardian/Portfolio) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consultancy, economic concentration, energy industry, investment company, medical institution, merger control, pension scheme, provision of services, transport infrastructure








C_2018045EN.01000102.xml










7.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 45/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8597 — APG/Ardian/Portfolio)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2018/C 45/02)
On 24 January 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M8597. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Case T-436/16: Order of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — AEIM and Kazenas v Commission (Action for damages — Limitation — No proof of loss — Action manifestly bound to fail)
Date: 2018-02-07
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, corruption, damages, financial loss, indemnification, invitation to tender, limitation of legal proceedings, transparency in decision-making








C_2018123EN.01002101.xml










9.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/21





Order of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — AEIM and Kazenas v Commission
(Case T-436/16) (1)

((Action for damages - Limitation - No proof of loss - Action manifestly bound to fail))
(2018/C 123/28)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Application électronique industrielle moderne (AEIM) (Algrange, France) and Philippe Kazenas (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: B. Wizel, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: S. Delaude and S. Lejeune, and subsequently by S. Delaude, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation in respect of the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of acts of corruption committed by a servant of the Commission.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Application électronique industrielle moderne (AEIM) and Mr Philippe Kazenas shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.