do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-561/16: Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2018 — Galocha v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy (Civil Service — Members of contract staff — Selection procedure for the Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy — Reserve lists — Irregularity of the selection procedure — Subsequent measures intended for third parties — Interest of third parties — Interest of the service)
Date: 2018-01-25
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Joint Undertaking, competition (EU), nuclear fusion, nuclear research, servant (EU)








C_2018094EN.01002002.xml










12.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/20





Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2018 — Galocha v Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy
(Case T-561/16) (1)

((Civil Service - Members of contract staff - Selection procedure for the Joint Undertaking Fusion for Energy - Reserve lists - Irregularity of the selection procedure - Subsequent measures intended for third parties - Interest of third parties - Interest of the service))
(2018/C 094/26)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Yosu Galocha (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Asmaryan Degtyareva and R-B. Dan, lawyers)

Defendant: European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy (represented by: R. Hanak, G. Poszler and S. Bernal Blanco, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU seeking, in particular, the annulment of the decision of the selection board, notified by the e-mail of the Head of Unit of Human Resources of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy of 4 June 2015, not to include the applicant’s name in the reserve lists of selection procedure F4E/CA/ST/FGIV/2015/001, the annulment of those reserve lists and the annulment of the decisions to appoint the successful candidates included in those lists.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the selection board, notified by the e-mail of the Head of Unit of Human Resources of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy of 4 June 2015, not to include the name of Mr Yosu Galocha in the reserve lists of selection procedure F4E/CA/ST/FGIV/2015/001;










2.


Annuls the reserve lists of selection procedure F4E/CA/ST/FGIV/2015/001;










3.


Annuls the decisions of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy to appoint the successful candidates included in the reserve lists of selection procedure F4E/CA/ST/FGIV/2015/001;










4.


Dismisses the remainder of the action;










5.


Orders the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy to pay the costs, including those incurred in the interlocutory proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 328, 5.10.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-117/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).
Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2018/132 of 25 January 2018 implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
Date: 2018-01-25
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, trade restriction, vessel








L_2018022EN.01003401.xml










26.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 22/34








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (CFSP) 2018/132
of 25 January 2018
         
implementing Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 of 31 July 2015 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya, and repealing Decision 2011/137/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 31 July 2015, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333.












(2)


On 18 January 2018, the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1970 (2011) renewed and amended the listing of a vessel subject to restrictive measures.












(3)


Annex V to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 should therefore be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Annex V to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 25 January 2018.


For the Council


The President

E. KRALEVA
            





(1)  
            OJ L 206, 1.8.2015, p. 34.




ANNEX
In section B (Entities) of Annex V to Decision (CFSP) 2015/1333, entry 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1.   Name: CAPRICORN

A.k.a.: na F.k.a.: na Address: na Listed on:
               21 July 2017 (amended on 20 October 2017, 27 November 2017, and 18 January 2018)

Additional information

IMO: 8900878. Listed pursuant to paragraphs 10 (a) and 10 (b) of Resolution 2146 (2014), as extended and modified by paragraph 2 of Resolution 2362 (2017) (prohibition to load, transport or discharge; prohibition to enter ports). Pursuant to paragraph 11 of Resolution 2146, this designation was renewed by the Committee on 18 January 2018 and is valid until 17 April 2018, unless terminated earlier by the Committee pursuant to paragraph 12 of Resolution 2146. Flag State: unknown. As of 21 September 2017, the vessel was located in international waters off the United Arab Emirates.’.
Communication from the Commission
Date: 2018-01-25
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European cultural event, European symbol, Lithuania, Luxembourg, capital city








C_2018027EN.01000102.xml










25.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 27/1





Communication from the Commission
(2018/C 27/02)
The 2022 European Capitals of Culture are Kaunas (Lithuania) and Esch-sur-Alzette (Luxembourg).
Case C-498/16: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof) — Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Articles 15 and 16 — Jurisdiction in respect of consumer contracts — Definition of ‘consumer’ — Assignment between consumers of claims against the same trader or professional)
Date: 2018-01-25
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: area of freedom, security and justice, claim, consumer, jurisdiction, legal domicile, social media








C_2018104EN.01000901.xml










19.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 104/9





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof) — Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited
(Case C-498/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Articles 15 and 16 - Jurisdiction in respect of consumer contracts - Definition of ‘consumer’ - Assignment between consumers of claims against the same trader or professional))
(2018/C 104/09)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Maximilian Schrems

Defendant: Facebook Ireland Limited

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Article 15 of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that the activities of publishing books, lecturing, operating websites, fundraising and being assigned the claims of numerous consumers for the purpose of their enforcement do not entail the loss of a private Facebook account user’s status as a ‘consumer’ within the meaning of that article.










2.


Article 16(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to the proceedings brought by a consumer for the purpose of asserting, in the courts of the place where he is domiciled, not only his own claims, but also claims assigned by other consumers domiciled in the same Member State, in other Member States or in non-member countries.






(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.