do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-398/16: Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — Starbucks v EUIPO — Nersesyan (COFFEE ROCKS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark COFFEE ROCKS — Earlier EU figurative marks STARBUCKS COFFEE — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2018-01-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, catering industry, coffee, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018072EN.01003402.xml










26.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/34





Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — Starbucks v EUIPO — Nersesyan (COFFEE ROCKS)
(Case T-398/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark COFFEE ROCKS - Earlier EU figurative marks STARBUCKS COFFEE - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 072/44)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Starbucks Corp. (Seattle, Washington, United States) (represented by: J. Schmitt, lawyer, and I. Fowler, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and A. Kusturovic, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Hasmik Nersesyan (Borgloon, Belgium)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2016 (Case R 559/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Starbucks Corp. and Ms Hasmik Nersesyan.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 May 2016 (Case R 559/2015-4);










2.


Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.
Case T-862/16: Order of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — fritz-kulturgüter v EUIPO — Sumol + Compal Marcas (fritz-wasser)
Date: 2018-01-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018083EN.01002301.xml










5.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 83/23





Order of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — fritz-kulturgüter v EUIPO — Sumol + Compal Marcas (fritz-wasser)
(Case T-862/16) (1)

(2018/C 083/35)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.
Case T-715/16: Order of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — Pebagua v Commission (Action for annulment — Environment — Protection against invasive alien species — Prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species — Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 — Adoption of a list of invasive alien species of concern to the European Union — Inclusion of the Procambarus clarkii species — No individual concern — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2018-01-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: admissibility, crustacean, environmental protection, environmental risk prevention, invasive species








C_2018094EN.01002501.xml










12.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/25





Order of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — Pebagua v Commission
(Case T-715/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Environment - Protection against invasive alien species - Prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species - Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 - Adoption of a list of invasive alien species of concern to the European Union - Inclusion of the Procambarus clarkii species - No individual concern - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Manifest inadmissibility))
(2018/C 094/33)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) (Isla Mayor, Spain) (represented by: A. Uceda Sosa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Hermes and E. Sanfrutos Cano, Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1141 of 13 July 2016 adopting a list of invasive alien species of Union concern pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2016 L 189, p. 4).

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Asociación de la pesca y acuicultura del entorno de Doñana y del Bajo Guadalquívir (Pebagua) shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.