do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/124 of 15 January 2018 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pane di Matera’ (PGI))
Date: 2018-01-15
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Basilicata, Italy, bread, designation of origin, labelling, product designation








L_2018022EN.01000901.xml










26.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 22/9








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2018/124
of 15 January 2018
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pane di Matera’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Italy's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Pane di Matera’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 160/2008 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Pane di Matera’ (PGI) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 15 January 2018.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 160/2008 of 21 February 2008 registering certain names in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pane di Matera (PGI), Tinca Gobba Dorata del Pianalto di Poirino (PDO)) (OJ L 48, 22.2.2008, p. 27).

(3)  
            OJ C 305, 15.9.2017, p. 20.
Case C-533/17: Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Anja Oehlke, Wolfgang Oehlke v TUIfly GmbH
Date: 2018-01-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, indemnification, transport regulations








C_2018190EN.01002004.xml










4.6.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 190/20





Order of the President of the Court of 15 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Anja Oehlke, Wolfgang Oehlke v TUIfly GmbH
(Case C-533/17) (1)

(2018/C 190/36)
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 424, 11.12.2017.
Case T-13/18: Action brought on 15 January 2018 — Crédit mutuel Arkéa v EUIPO — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Crédit Mutuel)
Date: 2018-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, consultancy, electronic banking, financial services, insurance, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018094EN.01003001.xml










12.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/30





Action brought on 15 January 2018 — Crédit mutuel Arkéa v EUIPO — Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Crédit Mutuel)
(Case T-13/18)
(2018/C 094/40)
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: Crédit mutuel Arkéa (Le Relecq Kerhuon, France) (represented by: A. Casalonga, F. Codevelle and C. Bercial Arias, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Paris, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘Crédit Mutuel’ — European Union trade mark No 9 943 135

Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2017 in Case R 1724/2016-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision in so far as it concedes that the European Union trade mark No 9 943 135 ‘Crédit Mutuel’ has a distinctive character through use for certain goods in Classes 9, 35 and 36;










—


annul the contested decision in so far as it recognises the distinctive character of the European Union trade mark No 9 943 135 ‘Crédit Mutuel’ for certain goods in Classes 9, 16, 36, 38, 42 and 45;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 52(1)(a), read in combination with Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(3), of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-762/16: Order of the General Court of 15 January 2018 — ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe v ECHA (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents held by the ECHA — Request relating to documents and to the identity of an initial requestor of access to information of a registrant of substances under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Partial refusal of access — Withdrawal of the decision refusing access — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2018-01-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, chemical product, market approval








C_2018094EN.01002601.xml










12.3.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 94/26





Order of the General Court of 15 January 2018 — ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe v ECHA
(Case T-762/16) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents held by the ECHA - Request relating to documents and to the identity of an initial requestor of access to information of a registrant of substances under Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Partial refusal of access - Withdrawal of the decision refusing access - No need to adjudicate))
(2018/C 094/34)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange SA (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg) and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG (Duisburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Scheidmann and M. Kottmann, lawyers)

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented: initially by M. Heikkilä, C. Buchanan and E. Maurage, and subsequently by M. Heikkilä, C. Buchanan and W. Broere, acting as Agents, and by G. Gilmore, Barrister)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Decision ATD/52/2016 of the ECHA of 26 September 2016, notified to the applicants on 28 September 2016, which granted partial access to the requested documents regarding an earlier application for access to documents held by the ECHA.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).










3.


The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) shall, in addition to bearing its own costs, pay those incurred by ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange SA and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG.










4.


The EMA shall bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.






(1)  OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.