do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-2/18: Action brought on 8 January 2018 — Wirecard v EUIPO — AXA Banque (boon.)
Date: 2018-01-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, financial services, insurance, real estate business, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018063EN.01002401.xml










19.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/24





Action brought on 8 January 2018 — Wirecard v EUIPO — AXA Banque (boon.)
(Case T-2/18)
(2018/C 063/32)
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Wirecard AG (Aschheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Bayer, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: AXA Banque SA (Fontenay sous Bois, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘boon.’ — Application for registration No 14 672 562

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 September 2017 in Case R 706/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


reject the opposition brought by AXA Banque, société anonyme, and grant the application for registration of the trade mark applied for;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs, and extend this order to AXA Banque, société anonyme, if the latter decides to intervene in the proceedings.





Plea in law







—


Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case T-9/18: Action brought on 8 January 2018 — Addiko Bank v EUIPO (STRAIGHTFORWARD BANKING)
Date: 2018-01-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, advertising, business administration, business management, financial services, insurance, pulp and paper industry, registered trade mark, teaching materials, trade-mark law








C_2018072EN.01004701.xml










26.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/47





Action brought on 8 January 2018 — Addiko Bank v EUIPO (STRAIGHTFORWARD BANKING)
(Case T-9/18)
(2018/C 072/60)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Addiko Bank AG (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: A. Seling, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘STRAIGHTFORWARD BANKING’ — Application for registration No 16 133 449

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 October 2017 in Case R 1090/2017-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 2017/1001;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 2017/1001.
Case T-7/18: Action brought on 8 January 2018 — inforsacom Informationssysteme v EUIPO (Business and technology working as one)
Date: 2018-01-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business management, consultancy, information technology industry, maintenance, registered trade mark, teaching materials, telecommunications, trade-mark law, vocational training








C_2018072EN.01004602.xml










26.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/46





Action brought on 8 January 2018 — inforsacom Informationssysteme v EUIPO (Business and technology working as one)
(Case T-7/18)
(2018/C 072/59)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: inforsacom Informationssysteme GmbH (Neu-Isenburg, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Business and technology working as one’ –Application for registration No 15 272 586

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 October 2017 in Case R 808/2017-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(c), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation 2017/1001;










—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), in conjunction with Article 7(2), of Regulation 2017/1001.