do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-829/17: Action brought on 27 December 2017 — Coesia v EUIPO (Representation of a circular shape consisting of two oblique red lines)
Date: 2017-12-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, business administration, business management, maintenance, mechanical engineering, packaging, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018063EN.01001902.xml










19.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/19





Action brought on 27 December 2017 — Coesia v EUIPO (Representation of a circular shape consisting of two oblique red lines)
(Case T-829/17)
(2018/C 063/26)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Coesia SpA (Bologna, Italy) (represented by S. Rizzo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO


Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark (Representation of a circular shape consisting of two oblique red lines) — Application for registration No 13 681 151.

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2017 in Case R 1272/2017-5.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision;










—


order EUIPO to pay the costs.





Pleas in law







—


Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;










—


Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.
Case C-721/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 27 December 2017 — Sebastian Vollmer, Vera Sagalov v Swiss Global Air Lines AG
Date: 2017-12-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, damages, traveller








C_2018123EN.01000802.xml










9.4.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/8





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 27 December 2017 — Sebastian Vollmer, Vera Sagalov v Swiss Global Air Lines AG
(Case C-721/17)
(2018/C 123/12)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Sebastian Vollmer, Vera Sagalov

Defendant: Swiss Global Air Lines AG

Questions referred







1.


Can a right to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) also exist in the case where a passenger fails to catch a direct connecting flight due to a delay in arrival of less than three hours, with the result that there is a delay in arrival at the final destination of three hours or more, but the two flights were operated by different air carriers?










2.


Can a right to compensation under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 also exist in the case where the different air carriers are part of the same corporate group?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).
Case T-827/17: Action brought on 27 December 2017 — Aeris Invest v ECB
Date: 2017-12-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: access to EU information, aid for restructuring, bank, company in difficulties, confidentiality, monetary policy, professional secret, right to information, right to justice








C_2018063EN.01001801.xml










19.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/18





Action brought on 27 December 2017 — Aeris Invest v ECB
(Case T-827/17)
(2018/C 063/24)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Aeris Invest Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset, A. Sellés Marco, C. Iglesias Megías and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Annul the Decisions of the ECB LS/MD/17/405, LS/PT/17/406 and LS/MD/17/419 of 7 November 2017; and










—


Order the ECB to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 8(3) of the Decision of the European Central Bank of 4 March 2004 on public access to European Central Bank documents (ECB/2004/3), this action seeks annulment of the Decisions of the European Central Bank LS/MD/17/405, LS/PT/17/406 and LS/MD/17/419 of 7 November 2017 relating to confirmatory requests for access to ECB documents.
In support of the action, the applicant relies upon four pleas in law:






1.


First plea in law: Decisions LS/MD/17/405, LS/PT/17/406 and LS/MD/17/419 infringe Article 4(1)(c) of the Access Decision inasmuch as they deny the applicant access to information on the grounds that the documents are claimed to be, fully or in part, protected by a general presumption of non-accessibility because they are confidential documents covered by the principle of professional secrecy applicable to the institutions.










2.


Second plea in law: Decision LS/PT/17/406 infringes the second and sixth indents of Article 4(1)(a) of the Access Decision inasmuch as it states that disclosure of Banco Popular’s use of ELA (emergency liquidity assistance) in the days preceding its resolution and of information regarding its liquidity situation and capital ratios could in fact specifically sap the efficiency of the monetary policy and financial stability of the Union or of a Member State.










3.


Third plea in law: Decision LS/PT/17/406 and Decision LS/MD/17/419 infringe the first indent of Article 4(2) of the Access Decision by stating that the documents and information requested are commercially sensitive material that could affect the commercial interests of the Banco Popular and Banco Santander.










4.


Fourth plea in law: the ECB has infringed Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union by denying the applicant access to the documents upon which the ECB based its decision to declare the resolution of the Banco Popular.