do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-692/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — CJ v ECDC (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Fixed-term contract — Article 47(b) of the CEOS — Annulment of early termination decision — Article 266 TFEU — Compliance with a judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal — Adoption of new early termination decision — Retroactive effect)
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: indemnification, servant (EU), staff regulations (EU), temporary employment, termination of employment, work contract








C_2018042EN.01002101.xml










5.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/21





Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — CJ v ECDC
(Case T-692/16) (1)

((Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Fixed-term contract - Article 47(b) of the CEOS - Annulment of early termination decision - Article 266 TFEU - Compliance with a judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal - Adoption of new early termination decision - Retroactive effect))
(2018/C 042/29)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: CJ (represented by: V. Kolias, lawyer)

Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by J. Mannheim and A. Daume, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought under Article 270 TFEU seeking, on the one hand, the annulment, first, of the ECDC decision of 2 December 2015 terminating, with retroactive effect as from 30 April 2012, the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff and, secondly, of the ECDC decision of 27 June 2016 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against that termination decision and, on the other hand, compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders CJ to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8612 — CZ/DT/Carl Zeiss Smart Optics) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, information technology industry, merger control, optical industry, telecommunications industry








C_2017428EN.01000602.xml










13.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 428/6





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8612 — CZ/DT/Carl Zeiss Smart Optics)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 428/03)
On 5 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8612. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8727 — CGE/EDPR/TrustWind/DGE/Repsol/WindPlus) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Economic Area, economic concentration, electrical energy, energy industry, energy production, merger control, renewable energy, wholesale trade, wind energy








C_2017428EN.01000601.xml










13.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 428/6





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8727 — CGE/EDPR/TrustWind/DGE/Repsol/WindPlus)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 428/02)
On 5 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8727. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8700 — Engie/Omnes Capital/Prédica Prévoyance/Target) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, electricity supply, gas supply, insurance company, investment company, merger control, power plant, provision of services








C_2017428EN.01000802.xml










13.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 428/8





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8700 — Engie/Omnes Capital/Prédica Prévoyance/Target)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 428/07)
On 7 December 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8700. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2017428EN.01001601.xml










13.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 428/16





Euro exchange rates (1)

12 December 2017
(2017/C 428/10)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1766 




JPY


Japanese yen


133,54 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4423 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88068 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,9328 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1671 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,8245 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,596 




HUF


Hungarian forint


314,33 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2044 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6335 




TRY


Turkish lira


4,5040 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5541 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,5098 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,1848 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6956 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5901 




KRW


South Korean won


1 281,27 




ZAR


South African rand


16,0156 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7875 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5395 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 004,41 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,7860 




PHP


Philippine peso


59,377 




RUB


Russian rouble


69,2925 




THB


Thai baht


38,369 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,9051 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,4566 




INR


Indian rupee


75,7700 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, European Commission
Subjects: Denmark, EU waters, North Sea, catch area, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, sea fish, sea fishing








C_2017428EN.01003201.xml










13.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 428/32





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
(2017/C 428/12)
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


10.10.2017




Duration


10.10.2017 – 31.12.2017




Member State


Denmark




Stock or Group of stocks


LIN/04-C.




Species


Ling (Molva molva)




Zone


Union waters of IV




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


20/TQ127






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1
Case T-114/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Delfin Wellness v EUIPO — Laher (Infrared and sauna cabins) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered community designs representing infrared and sauna cabins — Earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Lack of novelty — Article 5 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Disclosure of the earlier designs before the date of priority — Article 7(1) and (2) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Right to be heard — Article 64(1) of Regulation No 6/2002)
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: designs and models, leisure, non-ionising radiation








C_2018042EN.01001502.xml










5.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/15





Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Delfin Wellness v EUIPO — Laher (Infrared and sauna cabins)
(Case T-114/16) (1)

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered community designs representing infrared and sauna cabins - Earlier designs - Ground for invalidity - Lack of novelty - Article 5 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Disclosure of the earlier designs before the date of priority - Article 7(1) and (2) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Right to be heard - Article 64(1) of Regulation No 6/2002))
(2018/C 042/21)
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Delfin Wellness GmbH (Leonding, Austria) (represented by: T. Riedler, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Sabine Laher (Weyer, Austria) (represented by: P. Pfeil, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against three decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 January 2016 (Cases R 849/2014–3, R 850/2014–3 and R 851/2014–3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Delfin Wellness and Ms Laher.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Delfin Wellness GmbH to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Ms Sabine Laher for the purposes of the three sets of proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).






(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.
Case T-52/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Crédit mutuel Arkéa v ECB (Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 — Prudential supervision at the consolidated level — Group subject to prudential supervision — Institutions permanently affiliated to a central body — Article 2(21)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 — Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 — Capital requirements — Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(a) of Regulation No 1024/2013)
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Economic and Monetary Union, banking supervision, credit institution, financial supervision








C_2018042EN.01001501.xml










5.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/15





Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Crédit mutuel Arkéa v ECB
(Case T-52/16) (1)

((Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Prudential supervision at the consolidated level - Group subject to prudential supervision - Institutions permanently affiliated to a central body - Article 2(21)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 - Article 10 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Capital requirements - Article 16(1)(c) and (2)(a) of Regulation No 1024/2013))
(2018/C 042/20)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Crédit mutuel Arkéa (Le Relecq Kerhuon, France) (represented by: H. Savoie and P. Mele, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: K, Lackhoff, R. Bax and C. Olivier, acting as Agents, and M. Pittie, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and K.-P. Wojcik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Decision ECB/SSM/2015 — 9695000CG 7B84NLR5984/40 of the ECB of 4 December 2015 setting out the prudential requirements for the Crédit Mutuel group.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Crédit mutual Arkéa to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Central Bank (ECB).










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.
Case T-482/16 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB (Civil service — EIB Staff — Time limit for bringing an action — Reasonable period of time — Pension — 2008 Reform — Contractual nature of the employment relationship — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons — Legal certainty — Liability — Non-material damage)
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, damages, limitation of legal proceedings, pay, principle of legal certainty, principle of proportionality, social-security contribution, supplementary pension








C_2018042EN.01001701.xml










5.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/17





Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB
(Case T-482/16 RENV) (1)

((Civil service - EIB Staff - Time limit for bringing an action - Reasonable period of time - Pension - 2008 Reform - Contractual nature of the employment relationship - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons - Legal certainty - Liability - Non-material damage))
(2018/C 042/23)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and the 33 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the judgment (represented by: C. Cortese and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented initially by C. Gómez de la Cruz and T. Gilliams, and subsequently by T. Gilliams and G. Nuvoli and lastly by T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and by P.-E. Partsch, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decisions of the EIB, contained in the applicants’ payslips for the month of February 2010, to increase their pension contribution rates and, secondly, an order that the EIB pay a symbolic EUR 1 by way of compensation for the non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo and the other staff members of the European Investment Bank (EIB) whose names appear in the annex to pay the costs of these proceedings.










3.


Orders the EIB to pay the costs incurred in Cases F-34/10, T-234/11 P and T-234/11 P RENV–RX.






(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-34/10).
Case T-700/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Ascendo Medienagentur (SLIMDYNAMICS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark SLIMDYNAMICS — Earlier national word mark DYNAMIN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, dietary product, food supplement, non-alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2018042EN.01002102.xml










5.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/21





Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Ascendo Medienagentur (SLIMDYNAMICS)
(Case T-700/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark SLIMDYNAMICS - Earlier national word mark DYNAMIN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 042/30)
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Ascendo Medienagentur AG (Gamprin-Bendern, Liechtenstein)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 July 2016 (Joined Cases R 1814/2015-4 and R 1780/2015-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Ern and Ascendo Medienagentur.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Laboratorios Ern, SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.
Case C-487/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2017 — Telefónica SA v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Portuguese and Spanish telecommunications markets — Non-competition clause contained in an agreement entered into between two companies — Restriction by object — Rights of defence — Refusal to hear witnesses — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Mitigating circumstances)
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Portugal, Spain, domestic market, international cartel, market-sharing agreement, non-competition clause, rights of the defence, sanction (EU), telecommunications








C_2018052EN.01001001.xml










12.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 52/10





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2017 — Telefónica SA v European Commission
(Case C-487/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Portuguese and Spanish telecommunications markets - Non-competition clause contained in an agreement entered into between two companies - Restriction by object - Rights of defence - Refusal to hear witnesses - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Mitigating circumstances))
(2018/C 052/12)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Telefónica SA (represented by: J. Folguera Crespo and P. Vidal Martínez, abogados)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Telefónica SA to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 427, 21.11.2016.
Case T-4/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Coedo Suárez v Council (Civil service — Civil servants — Automatic retirement — Application for recognition of the occupational origin of the invalidity — Classification of the claim — Reasonable period — Irregularity of the prior administrative procedure — Inadmissibility — Liability)
Date: 2017-12-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, occupational accident, worker with disabilities








C_2018042EN.01002401.xml










5.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 42/24





Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Coedo Suárez v Council
(Case T-4/17) (1)

((Civil service - Civil servants - Automatic retirement - Application for recognition of the occupational origin of the invalidity - Classification of the claim - Reasonable period - Irregularity of the prior administrative procedure - Inadmissibility - Liability))
(2018/C 042/34)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Ángel Coedo Suárez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking, first, annulment of the Council decision of 4 March 2016 refusing to recognise the occupational origin of the applicant’s invalidity and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Ángel Coedo Suárez to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.