do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8661 — Oaktree/PIMCO/Real Estate Portfolio) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-11-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment, investment company, merger control, property leasing, provision of services








C_2017406EN.01000102.xml










30.11.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 406/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8661 — Oaktree/PIMCO/Real Estate Portfolio)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 406/02)
On 23 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8661. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 30 November 2017 on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Luxembourg and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Georgia and South Africa to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2017)0357 — C8-0233/2017 — 2017/0148(NLE))
Date: 2017-11-30
Institutions: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, Committee on Legal Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: Georgia, Luxembourg, Romania, South Africa, accession to an agreement, child, child protection, illegal restraint, international convention, parental responsibility








C_2018356EN.01020301.xml










4.10.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 356/203






P8_TA(2017)0467
Accession of Georgia and South Africa to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction *
European Parliament legislative resolution of 30 November 2017 on the proposal for a Council decision authorising Luxembourg and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Georgia and South Africa to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (COM(2017)0357 — C8-0233/2017 — 2017/0148(NLE))
(Consultation)
(2018/C 356/48)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2017)0357),










—


having regard to Article 38, fourth paragraph, of the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,










—


having regard to Article 81(3) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (b), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C8-0233/2017),










—


having regard to the opinion of the Court of Justice (1) on the exclusive external competence of the European Union for a declaration of acceptance of an accession to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,










—


having regard to Rules 78c and 108(8) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A8-0361/2017),












1.


Approves the authorisation for Luxembourg and Romania to accept, in the interest of the European Union, the accession of Georgia and South Africa to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, as well as to the Permanent Bureau of the Hague Conference on Private International Law.






(1)  Opinion of the Court of Justice of 14 October 2014, 1/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2303.
Case C-675/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato lodged on 30 November 2017 — Ministero della Salute v Hannes Preindl
Date: 2017-11-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, higher education, recognition of diplomas, recognition of vocational training qualifications, vocational training








C_2018052EN.01002301.xml










12.2.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 52/23





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato lodged on 30 November 2017 — Ministero della Salute v Hannes Preindl
(Case C-675/17)
(2018/C 052/33)
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Ministero della Salute

Respondent: Hannes Preindl

Questions referred







1.


Do Articles 21, 22 and 24 of the Directive (1) require a Member State, in which the full-time training requirement is in force, and the corresponding ban on enrolling in two degree courses at the same time, automatically to recognise qualifications obtained in the home Member State simultaneously or during periods that in part overlap.










2.


If so, can Article 22(a) and Article 21 of the Directive be interpreted to the effect that the authorities in the Member State from which recognition is sought may nevertheless ascertain whether the condition that the overall duration, level and quality of such training should not be lower than those of continuous full-time training is satisfied.






(1)  Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (OJ L 255, p. 22).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2227 of 30 November 2017 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ (PGI))
Date: 2017-11-30
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Hungary, Southern Alföld, designation of origin, fresh vegetable, labelling, product designation, root vegetable








L_2017319EN.01000101.xml










5.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 319/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/2227
of 30 November 2017
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Hungary's application to register the name ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Makói petrezselyemgyökér’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 30 November 2017.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 252, 3.8.2017, p. 14.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8668 — DER Touristik/EXIM) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-11-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, retail trade, tourism








C_2017406EN.01000101.xml










30.11.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 406/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8668 — DER Touristik/EXIM)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 406/01)
On 24 November 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8668. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.