do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-330/16: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2017 — Hello Media Group v EUIPO — Hola (#hello digitalmente diferentes) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark #hello digitalmente diferentes — Earlier EU word and figurative marks HELLO! — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Replacement of a party to the proceedings)
Date: 2017-10-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Internet site, advertising, consultancy, registered trade mark, software, trade-mark law








C_2017424EN.01003002.xml










11.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/30





Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2017 — Hello Media Group v EUIPO — Hola (#hello digitalmente diferentes)
(Case T-330/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark #hello digitalmente diferentes - Earlier EU word and figurative marks HELLO! - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Replacement of a party to the proceedings))
(2017/C 424/43)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Hello Media Group, SL (Madrid, Spain), authorised to replace Hello Media, SL (represented by: A. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hola, SL (Madrid) (represented by: F. Arroyo Álvarez de Toledo, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 April 2016 (Case R 1979/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Hola and Hello Media.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Authorises Hello Media Group, SL, to replace Hello Media, SL, as applicant;










2.


Dismisses the action;










3.


Orders Hello Media Group to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.
Notice of open competitions
Date: 2017-10-26
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Ireland, Latvia, Slovenia, administrator, competition (EU), information profession, legal profession








C_2017362EN.01002901.xml










26.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 362/29





NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS
(2017/C 362/03)
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:






 


EPSO/AD/348/17 — DANISH-LANGUAGE (DA) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)










 


EPSO/AD/349/17 — ESTONIAN-LANGUAGE (ET) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)










 


EPSO/AD/350/17 — IRISH-LANGUAGE (GA) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)










 


EPSO/AD/351/17 — CROATIAN-LANGUAGE (HR) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)










 


EPSO/AD/352/17 — LATVIAN-LANGUAGE (LV) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)










 


EPSO/AD/353/17 — SLOVENIAN-LANGUAGE (SL) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)




The competition notice is published in 24 languages in 
Official Journal of the European Union C 362 A of 26 October 2017.
Further information can be found on the EPSO website: https://epso.europa.eu/
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1977 of 26 October 2017 repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 876/2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature
Date: 2017-10-26
Institutions: Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, European Commission
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, common customs tariff, recording equipment, specification of tariff heading








L_2017285EN.01000101.xml










1.11.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 285/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/1977
of 26 October 2017
         
repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 876/2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (1), and in particular Articles 57(4) and 58(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


By Implementing Regulation (EU) No 876/2014 (2), the Commission classified a portable battery-operated apparatus for capturing and recording still and video images under CN code 8525 80 99 as other video camera recorders.












(2)


In its judgment in Joined Cases C-435/15 and C-666/15 (3), the Court of Justice ruled that Implementing Regulation (EU) No 876/2014 is invalid.












(3)


For reasons of legal certainty, provisions which have been declared invalid by the Court of Justice should be formally removed from the legal order of the Union.












(4)


Implementing Regulation (EU) No 876/2014 should therefore be repealed.












(5)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 876/2014 is repealed.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 26 October 2017.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Stephen QUEST
            

Director-General


Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union






(1)  
            OJ L 269, 10.10.2013, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 876/2014 of 8 August 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ L 240, 13.8.2014, p. 12).

(3)  Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 March 2017, GROFA and others, C-435/15 and C-666/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:232.
Case T-570/15: Order of the General Court of 26 October 2017 — Federcaccia della Regione Liguria and Others v Commission (Environment — Conservation of wild birds — Species which may be hunted — Conditions to be complied with by national laws on hunting — Harmonisation of the criteria for the application of Article 7(4) of Directive 2009/147/EC — Closed period of hunting in Liguria)
Date: 2017-10-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Corsica, EU environmental policy, France, Italy, Liguria, bird, conservation of resources, data collection, hunting regulations








C_2018005EN.01004202.xml










8.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 5/42





Order of the General Court of 26 October 2017 — Federcaccia della Regione Liguria and Others v Commission
(Case T-570/15) (1)

((Environment - Conservation of wild birds - Species which may be hunted - Conditions to be complied with by national laws on hunting - Harmonisation of the criteria for the application of Article 7(4) of Directive 2009/147/EC - Closed period of hunting in Liguria))
(2018/C 005/57)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicants: Federcaccia della Regione Liguria (Genoa, Italy) and the ten other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: A. Bruni, P. Balletti and A. Mozzati, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and C. Hermes, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to update certain Italian data in the document on key concepts, established by the ORNIS Committee, which is provided for by Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds (OJ 2010 L 20, p. 7); application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s letter of 6 October 2014 stating that the extension in Italy of the hunting season for certain species of bird is incompatible with EU law; and application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the Commission’s failure to update the Italian data.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Federcaccia della Regione Liguria and the other applicants whose names are set out in the annex shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 381, 16.11.2015.