do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-717/17: Action brought on 13 October 2017 — Chioreanu v ERCEA
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU programme, Framework Programme for Research and Development, award of contract, research, tendering








C_2018013EN.01002101.xml










15.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/21





Action brought on 13 October 2017 — Chioreanu v ERCEA
(Case T-717/17)
(2018/C 013/34)
Language of the case: Romanian

Parties


Applicant: Nicolae Chioreanu (Oradea, Romania) (represented by: D.-C. Rusu, lawyer)

Defendant: European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision rejecting the application for review of Proposal No 741797-NIP, ERC-2016-ADG;










—


order the European Research Council Executive Agency to review the research proposal.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of Commission Decision C(2015) 4975 on the European Research Council rules for submission of proposals and the related evaluation, selection and award procedures relevant to the specific programme of Horizon 2020.
Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.8522 — Avantor/VWR) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: chemical product, distributor, economic concentration, merger control, research body, scientific apparatus, supplier








C_2017343EN.01000202.xml










13.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/2





Withdrawal of notification of a concentration
(Case M.8522 — Avantor/VWR)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 343/04)
(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)
On 15 September 2017, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between Avantor, INC. and VWR Corporation. On 9 October 2017, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8102 – VALEO / FTE GROUP) (Text with EEA relevance) 2023/C 20/03
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: Directorate-General for Competition, European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, vehicle parts








C_2023020EN.01001301.xml










20.1.2023   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 20/13






Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8102 – VALEO / FTE GROUP)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2023/C 20/03)
On 13 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8102. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8561 — KKR / Q Park) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, merger control, parking area








C_2017343EN.01000101.xml










13.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8561 — KKR / Q Park)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 343/01)
On 13 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8561. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8528 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/Morgane Portfolio) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, investment company, logistics, merger control, storage, supplementary pension








C_2017343EN.01000201.xml










13.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8528 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/Morgane Portfolio)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 343/03)
On 25 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8528. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2017343EN.01000301.xml










13.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

12 October 2017
(2017/C 343/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,1856 




JPY


Japanese yen


133,12 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4438 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,90235 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,5883 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1552 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,3601 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


25,891 




HUF


Hungarian forint


309,18 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2730 




RON


Romanian leu


4,5919 




TRY


Turkish lira


4,3428 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,5175 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4785 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,2573 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6675 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6055 




KRW


South Korean won


1 341,86 




ZAR


South African rand


16,0091 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8111 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5090 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


16 016,27 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0036 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,101 




RUB


Russian rouble


68,4040 




THB


Thai baht


39,256 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,7654 




MXN


Mexican peso


22,2105 




INR


Indian rupee


77,0996 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-593/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 13 October 2017 — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, prepared foodstuff, specification of tariff heading








C_2018032EN.01001201.xml










29.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 32/12





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 13 October 2017 — Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG v Hauptzollamt Hannover
(Case C-593/17)
(2018/C 032/18)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Kreyenhop & Kluge GmbH & Co. KG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hannover

Questions referred







1.


Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 767/2014 of 11 July 2014 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (1) valid?










2.


If the answer to the first question is in the negative: Is the European Commission’s explanatory note to subheading 1902 3010 of the Combined Nomenclature, which was published on 4 March 2015, to be taken into consideration in the interpretation of subheading 1902 3010 of the CN in so far as frying is mentioned in that note as an example of an industrial drying process?






(1)  OJ 2014 L 209, p. 12.
Case T-711/17: Action brought on 13 October 2017 — Spinoit v Commission and Others
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU programme, application of EU law, association agreement (EU), damages, indemnification, right to justice, rights of the defence, senior management, technical cooperation








C_2018013EN.01002001.xml










15.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/20





Action brought on 13 October 2017 — Spinoit v Commission and Others
(Case T-711/17)
(2018/C 013/33)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Bernard Spinoit (Charleroi, Belgium) (represented by: H. Hansen, lawyer)

Defendants: European Commission and European External Action Service

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present application admissible and well-founded;




accordingly,






—


annul the undated decision signed electronically on 3 August 2017, entitled ‘Request for replacement of senior expert No 3 of contract ENPI/2016/381-920 SOFRECO “Technical assistance recruitment for the programme to support the implementation of the Association Agreement (P3A III)”’;










—


declare that full compensation is necessary for the material and non-material damage caused to the claimant by the serious violation of the right to good administration consisting in the adoption of the undated decision signed electronically on 3 August 2017, entitled ‘Request for replacement of senior expert No 3 of contract ENPI/2016/381-920 SOFRECO “Technical assistance recruitment for the programme to support the implementation of the Association Agreement (P3A III)”’;










—


order the defendants jointly and severally to pay the applicant the amount of EUR 209 950,00 for material damage and the amount of 15 000,00 for non-material damage;




in any event,






—


order the defendants to pay the entirety of the costs;










—


reserve to the applicant all other rights, dues, pleas in law and actions.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements, to the extent that, first, the applicant had not been heard prior to the adoption of the contested decision and had not had access to the file concerning him and, second, the reasoning contained in that decision did not allow the applicant to understand the facts alleged against him.
Case T-434/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2017 — Sensi Vigne & Vini v EUIPO — El Grifo (CONTADO DEL GRIFO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark CONTADO DEL GRIFO — Earlier EU figurative mark EL GRIFO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, alcoholic beverage, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2017402EN.01003001.xml










27.11.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 402/30





Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2017 — Sensi Vigne & Vini v EUIPO — El Grifo (CONTADO DEL GRIFO)
(Case T-434/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark CONTADO DEL GRIFO - Earlier EU figurative mark EL GRIFO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2017/C 402/38)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Sensi Vigne & Vini Srl (Lamporecchio, Italy) (represented by: initially by F. Caricato, and subsequently by M. Cartella and B. Cartella, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: El Grifo, SA (San Bartolomé, Lanzarote, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2016 (Case R 2218/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between El Grifo and Sensi Vigne & Vini.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Sensi Vigne & Vini Srl to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 350, 26.9.2016.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8555 — AES/Siemens/Fluence Energy/JV) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electrical engineering, energy industry, merger control, secondary sector








C_2017343EN.01000102.xml










13.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8555 — AES/Siemens/Fluence Energy/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 343/02)
On 9 October 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8555. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1542 of 8 June 2017 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 concerning the calculation of regulatory capital requirements for certain categories of assets held by insurance and reinsurance undertakings (infrastructure corporates) (OJ L 236, 14.9.2017)
Date: 2017-10-13
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: credit control, financial control, financial solvency, insurance company, market supervision, reinsurance




L_2017264EN.01002401.xml










13.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 264/24







Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1542 of 8 June 2017 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35 concerning the calculation of regulatory capital requirements for certain categories of assets held by insurance and reinsurance undertakings (infrastructure corporates)

(
Official Journal of the European Union L 236 of 14 September 2017
)


On page 18, in Article 1(4)(c):
for:


                  ‘
                  


                  ’
               

read:


                  ‘
                  


                  ’.