do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-411/10 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2017 — Laufen Austria v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria — Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Fine imposed jointly and severally on a parent company and its subsidiary — Ceiling of 10 % of turnover — Calculation of the ceiling on the basis solely of the turnover of the subsidiary for the period of the infringement prior to its acquisition by the parent company)
Date: 2017-09-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU Member State, cartel, competition policy, domestic market, market-sharing agreement, parent company, plumbing equipment, restriction on competition, sanction (EU), subsidiary








C_2017357EN.01000801.xml










23.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/8





Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2017 — Laufen Austria v Commission
(Case T-411/10 RENV) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Bathroom fittings and fixtures markets of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands and Austria - Decision establishing an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Fines - Fine imposed jointly and severally on a parent company and its subsidiary - Ceiling of 10 % of turnover - Calculation of the ceiling on the basis solely of the turnover of the subsidiary for the period of the infringement prior to its acquisition by the parent company))
(2017/C 357/09)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Laufen Austria AG (Wilhelmsburg, Austria) (represented by: E. Navarro Varona, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, F. Jimeno Fernández and F. Castilla Contreras, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking, first, partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 4185 final of 23 June 2010 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39092 — Bathroom Fittings and Fixtures) and, second, a reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant in that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Fixes at EUR 4 788 001 the portion of the fine imposed on Laufen Austria AG for which it is held individually liable in respect of the infringement committed during the period between 12 October 1994 and 28 October 1999;










2.


Orders Laufen Austria AG and the European Commission each to bear their own respective costs relating to the proceedings before the General Court and the Court of Justice.






(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 September 2017 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and Iceland concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (12146/2016 — C8-0129/2017 — 2016/0293(NLE))
Date: 2017-09-12
Institutions: Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, Committee on International Trade, European Parliament
Subjects: Iceland, agricultural product, agricultural trade, liberalisation of trade, ratification of an agreement, tariff exemption, tariff quota, tariff reduction, trade agreement (EU)








C_2018337EN.01015901.xml










20.9.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 337/159






P8_TA(2017)0320
EU-Iceland Agreement concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products ***
European Parliament legislative resolution of 12 September 2017 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and Iceland concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (12146/2016 — C8-0129/2017 — 2016/0293(NLE))
(Consent)
(2018/C 337/24)

The European Parliament,






—


having regard to the draft Council decision (12146/2016),










—


having regard to the draft Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and Iceland concerning additional trade preferences in agricultural products (12147/2016),










—


having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C8-0129/2017),










—


having regard to Rule 99(1) and (4) and Rule 108(7) of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A8-0256/2017),












1.


Gives its consent to conclusion of the agreement;












2.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Iceland.
Case T-678/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2017 — Siragusa v Council (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Leaving the service — Request to retire — Amendment of the Staff Regulations after that request had been made — Withdrawal of an earlier decision — Legal classification of the contested decision)
Date: 2017-09-12
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, early retirement, retirement conditions, staff regulations (EU)








C_2017357EN.01001201.xml










23.10.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 357/12





Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2017 — Siragusa v Council
(Case T-678/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Leaving the service - Request to retire - Amendment of the Staff Regulations after that request had been made - Withdrawal of an earlier decision - Legal classification of the contested decision))
(2017/C 357/15)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Sergio Siragusa (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, acting as Agents) and European Parliament (represented by: M. Dean and D. Nessaf, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 July 2016, Siragusa v Council (F-124/15, EU:F:2016:147), seeking to have that order set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Sets aside the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 July 2016, Siragusa v Council (F-124/15);










2.


Refers the case to a chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled on the present appeal;










3.


Reserves the costs.






(1)  OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1557 of 12 September 2017 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Coco de Paimpol (PDO))
Date: 2017-09-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Brittany, France, designation of origin, labelling, leguminous vegetable, product designation








L_2017237EN.01006601.xml










15.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 237/66








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/1557
of 12 September 2017
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Coco de Paimpol (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Coco de Paimpol’, registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1645/1999 (2).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3), as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.












(3)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments to the specification should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name ‘Coco de Paimpol’ (PDO) are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 September 2017.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1645/1999 of 27 July 1999 supplementing the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 on the entry of certain names in the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’ provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 2081/92 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 195, 28.7.1999, p. 7).

(3)  
            OJ C 137, 29.4.2017, p. 9.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1555 of 12 September 2017 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Πευκοθυμαρόμελο Κρήτης (Pefkothymaromelo Kritis) (PDO))
Date: 2017-09-12
Institutions: Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission
Subjects: Crete, Greece, designation of origin, honey, labelling, product designation








L_2017237EN.01006401.xml










15.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 237/64








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/1555
of 12 September 2017
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Πευκοθυμαρόμελο Κρήτης (Pefkothymaromelo Kritis) (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece's application to register the name ‘Πευκοθυμαρόμελο Κρήτης’ (Pefkothymaromelo Kritis) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Πευκοθυμαρόμελο Κρήτης’ (Pefkothymaromelo Kritis) should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name ‘Πευκοθυμαρόμελο Κρήτης’ (Pefkothymaromelo Kritis) (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.
The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.4. — Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 12 September 2017.


For the Commission,


On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ C 108, 6.4.2017, p. 20.

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).
Case C-537/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 12 September 2017 — Claudia Wegener v Royal Air Maroc SA
Date: 2017-09-12
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: air transport, carriage of passengers, carrier, consumer protection, indemnification, traveller








C_2017424EN.01002101.xml










11.12.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 424/21





Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 12 September 2017 — Claudia Wegener v Royal Air Maroc SA
(Case C-537/17)
(2017/C 424/31)
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Landgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Claudia Wegener

Defendant: Royal Air Maroc SA

Question referred

Is there a flight, for the purposes of Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, in the case where an air carrier’s air transport operation includes scheduled interruptions (stopovers) outside the territory of the European [Union] with a change of aircraft?


(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8459 — TIL/PSA/PSA DGD) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-09-12
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: container, economic concentration, engineering structure, harbour installation, holding company, investment company, maritime shipping, merger control








C_2017301EN.01000101.xml










12.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 301/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8459 — TIL/PSA/PSA DGD)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 301/01)
On 31 July 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8459. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.