do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2017-09-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate, money








C_2017299EN.01000301.xml










9.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

8 September 2017
(2017/C 299/05)

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2060 




JPY


Japanese yen


129,50 




DKK


Danish krone


7,4402 




GBP


Pound sterling


0,91268 




SEK


Swedish krona


9,5388 




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1405 




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


9,3093 




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558 




CZK


Czech koruna


26,099 




HUF


Hungarian forint


306,46 




PLN


Polish zloty


4,2534 




RON


Romanian leu


4,6008 




TRY


Turkish lira


4,1191 




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4881 




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4577 




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,4160 




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6502 




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6124 




KRW


South Korean won


1 363,52 




ZAR


South African rand


15,5124 




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,7926 




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4315 




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


15 874,85 




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


5,0586 




PHP


Philippine peso


61,276 




RUB


Russian rouble


68,9650 




THB


Thai baht


39,919 




BRL


Brazilian real


3,7256 




MXN


Mexican peso


21,3382 




INR


Indian rupee


76,9245 






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-619/17: Action brought on 9 September 2017 — de la Fuente Martín and Others v SRB
Date: 2017-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Spain, abuse of power, aid for restructuring, company in difficulties, credit institution, damages, financial solvency, ownership, right to justice, share








C_2018005EN.01004401.xml










8.1.2018   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 5/44





Action brought on 9 September 2017 — de la Fuente Martín and Others v SRB
(Case T-619/17)
(2018/C 005/59)
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicants: Juan Antonio de la Fuente Martín (Madrid, Spain) and 525 other applicants (represented by: M. Durán Muñoz and M. Duran Campos, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:






—


Annul the resolution or decision of the Single Resolution Board, adopted at its expanded executive session of 7 June 2017 (Decision SRB/EES/2017/08), published partially and incompletely on 12 July 2017 adopting the resolution scheme regarding the institution Banco Popular Español, S.A., thereby depriving it of effect and repealing it, and order the return to shareholders and owners of capital instruments of their respective shares and capital instruments of that bank and, consequently, reinstate their rights in full.










—


Alternatively, declare that SRB’s contested decision has caused harm to Banco Popular Español, S.A. shareholders and bond holders — harm in respect of which SRB is under an obligation to pay compensation, in accordance with Article 87 of Regulation No 806/2014 of 15 July 2014 — and order SRB and, consequently, the European Union to pay compensation to the applicants in an amount equivalent to the financial value of the shares and capital instruments which were held by the applicants the day before the adoption of the contested decision or, where appropriate, in the alternative, in an amount equivalent to the financial value those shares and instruments would have maintained had the financial institution been subject to an ordinary insolvency procedure at the time of the adoption of the contested decision.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8593 — CVC/PAI/Cortefiel) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-09-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: clothing industry, consultancy, economic concentration, footwear industry, investment company, merger control, retail trade








C_2017299EN.01000202.xml










9.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8593 — CVC/PAI/Cortefiel)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 299/04)
On 5 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8593. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8592 — Centerbridge/EGPH/JV) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-09-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electricity supply, energy production, gas supply, investment company, merger control, power plant, wind energy








C_2017299EN.01000102.xml










9.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8592 — Centerbridge/EGPH/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 299/02)
On 4 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8592. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8596 — Colindale/Goldman Sachs/JRE) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-09-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: banking, economic concentration, investment, investment company, merger control, renewable energy, securities








C_2017299EN.01000201.xml










9.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8596 — Colindale/Goldman Sachs/JRE)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 299/03)
On 5 September 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8596. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission communication pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations (OJ C 280, 24.8.2017)
Date: 2017-09-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Ireland, Leinster, Munster, Ulster-Donegal, air transport, inland transport, invitation to tender, services of general interest, transport regulations








C_2017299EN.01001801.xml










9.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/18





Corrigendum to Commission communication pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations
(
Official Journal of the European Union C 280 of 24 August 2017
)
(2017/C 299/09)






(1)


On cover page and on page 2, the title should read as follows:





‘Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations’.







(2)


On page 2, in the table:





for:


‘Invitation to tender and related documentation may be obtained at: www.etenders.ie’,


read:


‘Invitation to tender and related documentation may be obtained at: www.etenders.gov.ie’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.8575 — OTPP/AIMCo/Borealis/KIA/LCY) (Text with EEA relevance. )
Date: 2017-09-09
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: airport, economic concentration, investment company, merger control, supplementary pension








C_2017299EN.01000101.xml










9.9.2017   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case M.8575 — OTPP/AIMCo/Borealis/KIA/LCY)
(Text with EEA relevance)
(2017/C 299/01)
On 8 August 2017, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32017M8575. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.






(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.